User talk:Ralfdetlef

Welcome!

Hi Ralfdetlef! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Andre🚐 19:17, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; will have a look at the tutorials...--Ralfdetlef (talk) 20:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks and American politics

Talk pages are for discussing the articles, not their subjects. And please do not use personal attacks against other editors, as you did here. Further personal attacks may result in a block from editing. Also, please be aware of the special rules in place regarding American politics:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 09:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. The Idiots to me were the Dem guys buying votes for extreme right-wing Rep candidates; but I guess it was poorly written.--Ralfdetlef (talk) 16:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Dennis Prager are strictly for discussing the topic of their associated main pages and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about unrelated topics. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Politanvm ^talk 14:34, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I can see your point. But, as Chou En Lai said of the French Revolution, it's to way to early to really know if it was good or bad. There are tons and tons of Covid remarks in WP articles and they are all wrong, must be wrong, because we simply don't know, what really happened, what worked, what didn't. And it will make Wikipedia look incredible stupid in two or three years...--Ralfdetlef (talk) 16:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:National Geographic for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 08:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It took a lot of work

Yes, people constantly wanted to insert non-encyclopædic material. Basically unless you are very patient, monitor frequently, and evenly and fairly discuss on TP, things usually go astray quickly. And I'm sure once people take their eye off the ball, it will happen again. But the most important component is to have several eyes. Otherwise you quickly get overrun. Also: know your WP:PG. Cheerio, XavierItzm (talk) 04:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, all the WP guidelines are in a way necessary, I guess. But I am basically happy about every good article, esp. about sensitive stuff. I started contributing to german and english WP some ten years ago (User: Radh); but took a long break, and most of the people I knew then are long gone and I miss them -and some were hardcore communists, even Stalinists, but basically good guys.--Ralfdetlef (talk) 16:32, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using talk pages as though they are forums

You know you shouldn’t but continue. Doug Weller talk 17:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I use "they" when I don't know what sex an editor is. I hadn't seen the symbol on the top of this page indicating you are male. It's very common to use "they". Doug Weller talk 10:16, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

O.K., this was idiotic on my part. I was irritated, that's all.--Ralfdetlef (talk) 17:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:29, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics yearly reminder

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.