Talk:Anse au Foulon

Canada: Quebec / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 24 September 2008 by reviewer MSGJ (talk · contribs).

Redirect proposal

This place is referenced several times at Battle of the Plains of Abraham. As it lacks notability apart from the historical context of the battle, I propose changing this page to a redirect to that article. Rklear (talk) 15:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This change would create double redirects at Anse au Foulon and l'Anse au Foulon, both of which redirect here. Those would have to be changed also. Rklear (talk) 10:28, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose redirect to Battle of the Plains of Abraham. This article is about a place whereas the other one is about a historical event. If anything, it should be merged with and redirected to the larger geographic location it is part of. -- P199 (talk) 13:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those who do not know the significance of Anse-au-Foulon would not make the connection between it and the Battle of the Plains of Abraham. Merging it would not be of assistance to them, whereas keeping it, even as a stub, would. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.77.226.75 (talk) 14:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose- a merge or redirect is not appropriate. This article is about a geographical location. The target article is about an historical event. The topic material is thus not suited for a merge or redirect. -- Whpq (talk) 17:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opose - notable in its own right as a geographical location, which isn't solely confined to the Battle of 1759. I'd also suggest that after six months or so with no consensus for the merge, that the proposal be ended. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 18:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Agree as there is no concensus for a merge, I'm going to remove the merge suggestion templates. -- Whpq (talk) 18:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]