Talk:American Challenge: A Sailing Simulation

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Sailing Low‑importance

	American Challenge: A Sailing Simulation is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reassessing this article

@Anarchyte:@Videogameplayer99:@Ifnord:@Timtempleton:@The Gnome:@Lee Vilenski:

Hi all, I didn't take part in the deletion discussion when it took place, so I've had this article userfied while I locate sources to improve it and demonstrate its notability. I've done a quick search now and placed some links to new sources at the top. Please asses these sources alongside the previous sources and make a new assessment. If it's assessed that the article is notable, I will invest time into improving it properly.

Regards, Coin945--Coin945 (talk) 05:24, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the only one who didn't vote delete in the original discussion, instead voting weak keep. With the new sources, my weak keep becomes a keep. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]