Jump to content

Talk:Agustín Ross Cultural Centre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAgustín Ross Cultural Centre has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 8, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
September 17, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 10, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Ross Casino in Pichilemu was the first casino in Chile?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Agustín Ross Cultural Center/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SynergyStar (talk • contribs • count) 02:55, 17 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This article is an interesting summary of a unique historical location, it was very informative and interesting to read. The details and scope show diligent effort by the editors of the article, and are a credit to their dedication and contributory spirit.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The prose issues listed in the earlier review have been largely addressed, which has improved the article. There are some further areas though (italics indicate suggested changes):
    Lead
    -- "It is best known for housing one of the first casinos..." avoids the one/one issue.
    -- "The building has been used" -- "The building has also been used"
    1885–1906
    -- Is there any specific information on when the idea, planning, etc. for the cultural center came about? The article talks about the Gran Hotel Pichilemu and in the next section jumps to the cultural center being built, without specifically mentioning its conception. A sentence could preface the construction of the center (e.g. "Following the development of the Gran Hotel Pichilemu, Ross Edwards decided that the city needed a central attraction...").
    1906–1930
    -- Why were the services exclusive to the Hotel Empresa Pichilemu, and not the Gran Hotel Pichilemu? Were both of these Ross Edwards' establishments? There is no mention of the Hotel Empresa until its exclusive agreement is discussed. Perhaps there could be more detail about the Hotel Empresa connection (was it the best hotel in town, which is why it had those exclusive services?).
    -- "historiographers Antonio Saldías and José Arraño Acevedo have pointed out that it was inaugurated as..."
    -- "...to Argentinean businessman Alfredo Master; Saldías also noted..." -- the semi-colon should be replaced with a period to avoid a run-on sentence. There should also be a citation for Saldias' claim.
    -- "casino of Chile, opened all others were declared illegal." -- needs a semicolon to become "casino of Chile, opened; all others were declared illegal."
    -- "Ross had died in 1925" -- the "had" should be removed.
    1930–1995
    -- Foreign terms are italicized throughout the article, except "boîte"...please italicize that as well.
    1995–present
    -- "The budget was increased by 100 million pesos to 663,702,000 pesos (US$1,327,404) because there was "additional work to do"" -- the translated reference does not exactly show this quote, perhaps it can be paraphrased without the quote, e.g. "The budget was increased...to accommodate additional restoration work."
    -- "mansard roof" can be linked.
    -- "Some months later, on 23 August, Valenzuela announced that the restoration of the building..."
    -- "The cultural center would be managed by a non-political organization called the Corporación Cultural de Pichilemu (Pichilemu Cultural Corporation, which was eventually formed in June 2009)" -- this seems out of place, since it was formed later. Perhaps the management detail could be moved to after the January 2009 opening (e.g. "An exhibition of photographs by Ana María Encina Lemarchand was the first to be staged in the restored building. In June 2009, a non-political organization called the Corporación Cultural de Pichilemu (Pichilemu Cultural Corporation) was formed to manage the cultural center. The inauguration was supposed to take place...")
    -- "northwest and southeast towers"
    -- The "1995–present" section is twice as long as all the others. Perhaps it could be split into "1995–2008: Restoration" and "2009–present: Cultural center", right before the paragraph about the re-opening.
    Public library
    -- "Alejandra Domedel" -- who is she? An identifier (e.g. "curator", "head librarian", etc.) would help.
    In popular culture
    -- "Agustín Ross" is linked; this appears to be an overlink when "Agustín Ross Edwards" is linked above.
     Done Update: the above concerns have been addressed.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Improved since the previous review, good job. Checklinks also indicates that all web references are active. The article overall seems to reflect the sources well. Two formatting corrections are still needed however:
    -- As in the previous review, please change "Septiembre" to "September" for consistency.
    -- the last reference, please italicize Pichilemu News for consistency.
     Done Update: the above concerns have been addressed.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Addresses the topic's main aspects. Focused on the topic without extraneous detail.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Neutrally presented.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Article is stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Images are copyright tagged, with rationale; the 1935 photo has an 'explanation' of Chilean copyright, while the 1910 one has a link to the explanation, but both are ok; there is a completed fair-use claim for the library logo. The image selection, placement, and captions service the article well. Nice job on the double picture for the library.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I am putting this article on hold for approximately one week to address the remaining issues; should they be satisfactorily resolved, this article is likely to get GA status.
I think I fixed everything, I'm not sure about the sentence I added to the "idea" section, but otherwise, it's all fixed. :) BTW... thank you for reviewing the article!  Diego  talk  18:52, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Thank you for addressing these concerns in a very expedient manner!! I also made several minor adjustments for grammar and to complete all the mentioned items. This article offers a nice historical, contextual, and general overview of an interesting building. Congratulations on making it a Good Article. SynergyStar (talk) 20:16, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Agustín Ross Cultural Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Agustín Ross Cultural Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Agustín_Ross_Cultural_Centre&oldid=1204605288"