Talk:Agni-VI
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Agni-VI article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
[edit]I propose that Surya missile be merged into Agni-VI. The Surya missile is a codename of Agni-VI missile , so there is no relevance of having two articles providing the same information. gauravpruthi 07:48, 27 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gauravpruthi (talk • contribs)
- Oppose -
"The Surya missile is a codename of Agni-VI missile"
can you prove it?I will tell you why I ask this question. Surya missile reportedly has 2 types of its own Surya-1 and Surya-2. Surya-1 is speculated to have a range of 8,000 km and the Surya-2's range will probably be 12,000 km or more (none of which matches with the speculated range of Agni-VI). The reports about "Surya" missile was first published in "The Nonproliferation Review, Winter" in '95 p. 160. Agni-IV or Agni-III were not even in the picture then. What I'm trying to say is, the development of Agni-VI depends on the success of AGNI-V and since at the time of the report about "Surya", there was no Agni III, IV or V, the claim that Agni-VI is "Surya" doesn't add up. The rumour about "Surya (ICBM)" is most probably a propaganda with no foundation except for wishful thinking. Or, it may very well be that "Surya" was actually what we know as "Agni-V" or it's "Agni-VII", who knows? I hope this helps clear the air about "Surya (ICBM)" a little. I think, the Article about AGNI-VI is best the way it is. :) Brendon is here 12:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Dont merge - I agree with User:Brendon111. No concrete information available for either, specially Surya. Anir1uph (talk) 06:17, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Brendon, nominator has given no reference to prove his statement. hearsay ? -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 19:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Brendon. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 08:01, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Agni-VI. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120528201838/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/channels/cities/hyderabad/india-will-launch-agni-vi-next-says-drdo-chief-135 to http://www.deccanchronicle.com/channels/cities/hyderabad/india-will-launch-agni-vi-next-says-drdo-chief-135
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150607054543/http://www.9abc.net/index.php/archives/62453 to http://www.9abc.net/index.php/archives/62453
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120627030253/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/air-chief-pv-naik-in-favour-of-flexing-missile-power/Article1-708062.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Air-chief-PV-Naik-in-favour-of-flexing-missile-power/Article1-708062.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426184200/http://www.defencenews.in/defence-news-internal.asp?get=new&id=541 to http://www.defencenews.in/defence-news-internal.asp?get=new&id=541
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.defencenow.com/news/474/drdo-lab-develops-detonator-for-nuclear-capable-agni-v-missile-as-it-gets-ready-for-launch.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Proposed merge of Surya missile into Agni-VI
[edit](WP:OVERLAP) An article (link here) by The New Indian Express says that Agni-VI is the code name of Surya. This information looks credible as this news agency is one of those at the forefront when it is about reporting on ballistic-missile-related news (according to my personal observation). of actual missile have also emerged.
Note: This merge, if accepted, will have to be completed by another user since I won't be available on Wikipedia for some time. — Vaibhavafro 💬 06:49, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Little support Though I saw old discussion on same topic, I would support this merge as I could not find any source stating They are not same. Who knows? This project (surya) is classified, we didn't have much information about this project, neither we know it is currently in existence or not. But specification is almost same to Agni VI so I don't think they must be developing two missile with same specification. Just have a look here [1]. Agni VI is currently in development. Surya is not confirm so better to merge or delete Surya missile article. Brown Chocolate (talk) 09:04, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Brown Chocolate, what is 'little support'? You appear to be fully supporting the merge (and thanks for that). Please clarify in a comment below this.— Vaibhavafro 💬 15:24, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- B-Class India articles
- High-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of High-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Indian military history articles
- Indian military history task force articles
- C-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Rocketry articles
- Low-importance Rocketry articles
- WikiProject Rocketry articles