Talk:Adaptive grammar
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Adaptive grammar:
|
Adaptable vs. Adaptive
[edit]In John Shutt's masters thesis he calls the grammars "adaptable" and not "adaptive".
This is apparently categorized as philosophy. It should probably be computer science. 24.118.110.44 (talk) 06:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
In reference to the recent deletion
[edit]In reference to the recent deletion of an entire branch of this research, my work is cited in the following third party sources.
(Note that I have moved the list to my talk page to avoid clutter here.) QTJ (talk) 21:38, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
COI Check flag
[edit]I have flagged this for COI check myself because, as a researcher in this field, I am going to voluntarily recuse myself from any further undos of the recent removals. I find this an unsightly process. I defer to the community, et cetera. The citation list above is sufficient reference. In particular I suggest Grune et al for a quick check. Qtjackson (talk) 05:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
ftp://ftp.cs.vu.nl/pub/dick/PTAPG_2nd_Edition/CompleteList.pdf
A quick search on "Jackson" is sufficient. QTJ (talk) 20:53, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Jackson removal issue
[edit]Following a post at the COI noticeboard I've reviewed the Jackson deletion, and reverted it. The basis for my actions are a) QTJ seems to have put most of this article together, but refs to QTJ work are a fractional part of the page. He has provided a number of refs to his work, and the deleter of the Jackson references has yet to engage beyond drive-by deletions. Until better argument against the inclusion of Jackson work is provided here, I'm minded that the presumption should be in Jackson's favour. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Adaptive grammar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928143740/http://www.pcs.usp.br/~lta/union/index.php?cp=4 to http://www.pcs.usp.br/~lta/union/index.php?cp=4&categoria=28
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311082854/http://www.pcs.usp.br:80/~lta/disciplinas/fun_apl_tec_ada.htm to http://www.pcs.usp.br/~lta/disciplinas/fun_apl_tec_ada.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928143740/http://www.pcs.usp.br/~lta/union/index.php?cp=4 to http://www.pcs.usp.br/~lta/union/index.php?cp=4&categoria=28
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Addition of new Dynamic Syntax page
[edit]Hello all,
I am going to set up a new page for Dynamic Syntax the linguistic. I think this warrants a separate page on its own as distinct from the notions discussed here. The current re-direct will become a link on the new page. 2094gbsn (talk) 17:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- C-Class Computer science articles
- Low-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- C-Class Linguistics articles
- Low-importance Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class logic articles
- Low-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists