Talk:Abbasgulu Bakikhanov
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Abbasgulu Bakikhanov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928132619/http://www.shirvan.org/rus/content.php?review.45 to http://www.shirvan.org/rus/content.php?review.45
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928132619/http://www.shirvan.org/rus/content.php?review.45 to http://www.shirvan.org/rus/content.php?review.45
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
He is an "Azerbaijani"???
[edit]In the late 1930s, Stalin and his regime came up with the idea to refer to all of the Turks/Tatars and other ethnic groups of Muslim faith in the South Caucasian region as "Azerbaijani".
Abbasgulu Bakikhanov passed away 90 years before this.
How can he be an "Azerbaijani"? I've read his works and he never called himself an "Azerbaijani". In fact, his book about the South Caucasian region is called "SHIRVAN and DAGESTAN" and not "Azerbaijan". This article is yet another piece of fiction for the pan-Turk revisionism plaguing Wikipedia.
Sickofthisbs (talk) 14:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, we are all on a payroll by Erdogan.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Confucius never called himself "Chinese" and died many years before the term "China" was invented, so he is not Chinese, according to your logic.
- Regarding the use of Azerbaijanis as the etnonym: When the Southern Caucasus became part of the Russian Empire in the nineteenth century, the Russian authorities, who traditionally referred to all Turkic people as Tatars, defined Tatars living in the Transcaucasus region as Caucasian Tatars or more rarely Aderbeijanskie (Адербейджанские) Tatars or even Persian Tatars in order to distinguish them from other Turkic groups and the Persian speakers of Iran. The Russian Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary, written in the 1890s, also referred to Tatars in Azerbaijan as Aderbeijans (адербейджаны), but noted that the term had not been widely adopted. This ethnonym was also used by Joseph Deniker (1900):
213.172.93.38 (talk) 07:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[The purely linguistic] grouping [does not] coincide with the somatological grouping: thus the Aderbeijani of the Caucasus and Persia, who speak a Turkic language, have the same physical type as the Hadjemi-Persians, who speak an Iranian tongue
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Azerbaijan articles
- High-importance Azerbaijan articles
- WikiProject Azerbaijan articles
- Start-Class Iran articles
- Unknown-importance Iran articles
- WikiProject Iran articles
- Start-Class Russia articles
- Unknown-importance Russia articles
- Unknown-importance Start-Class Russia articles
- Start-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- Start-Class history articles
- Unknown-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class philosopher articles
- Low-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles
- Start-Class Modern philosophy articles
- Low-importance Modern philosophy articles
- Modern philosophy task force articles