Talk:APE tag

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Professional sound production Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

invalid?

"Despite the failings of the ID3 format, some developers consider MP3 files with APE tags to be invalid files." Which developers, exactly? —Slicing (talk) 16:29, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Me, and other developers of Quod Libet. I can provide you with cites in our bug tracker if you want. If you're going to call this into question, I'd also like a cite for APEv2 provides more flexibility and is rising in popularity that doesn't invoke foobar2000 (especially since it just stopped writing APEv2 tags by default). piman 16:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and Developers mainly endorse APEv2 because the ID3v2 tag is very rule based and very difficult to update. which was my inspiration for that sentence in the first place. Which developers? I may rewrite the whole page in the future to make the comparison without reference to what "developers" think. piman 16:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten the article to provide a better technical overview of the differences between ID3, Vorbis comments, and APEv2. The mysterious "developers" no longer make any claims in it. piman 19:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the article tries to emphasize the benefits of APE versus ID3V2 tags. I guess major benefits of ID3V2 include 1) ID3V2 frames have predefined names (codes) whereas the APE keys are free format strings, which may negatively impact compatibility. 2) An ID3V2 frame header includes the length of all the data in the frame. An APE item header only includes the length of the value, excluding the (variable) length of the key. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbakels (talk • contribs) 21:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

APETAGEX signals the start of an APEv2 record

The tagging string APETAGEX signals the start of an APEv2 record, and the string TAG signals the start of an ID3v1 tag.

The notability of this technical detail is unclear in this version of the article. I can guess the author intended to point out that if the length of the APE tag is such there are exactly 125 more bytes in it until the end of file, this tag might be interpreted as an ID3v1 tag by players that don't support APEv2, and cause them to display truncated fields and control codes as the metadata. This is a non-issue in practice.

1. The primary reason APEv2 is (was?) used was to record more information than an ID3v1 tag could hold, thus being longer. One could still craft a tag containing "TAG" in one of its fields, or, indeed, the last MPEG frame. There is no reason to do so.

2. Foobar2000 can be configured to also write a compatible, valid ID3v1 tag after APE, and this was the default choice around version 0.8. Legacy players thus always see a good, but limited capacity tag.

APEv2 is still a superior format, because the tag can be transferred without data loss between files that support it (most streamable files, such as mp3, mp2, ac3, dts), mpc, ape, wv, tak, and is fast to write. The key/value structure also means that, with few exceptions, all players display and use the "key" literally. This is not the case with ID3v2 or MP4, where players expand the four character codes to field names following what appears to be a vague standard followed at the time the player was written. Older players may fail to see certain entries such as "album artist" or "composer", or update them in a way that a newer player can't see them.

Data contained in APEv2 is also safe from modification by poorly written players, which could attempt to automatically "fix" tags or automatically insert statistics like ratings.

It is not the only "extra data" that can occur in mp3 files; incorrectly written remainders of "standard" tags do occur (such as RIFF Wave chunks). Good MP3 players can recover and resync past this data or end playback upon encountering it. Winamp can even play MP3 contained in packaged files, such as video game data. I've yet to encounter a case where a (regular size) tag forms a valid decodeable MPEG frame.

/ original, opinionated research

Informally collected thoughts of a few developers about APE vs ID3v2.

-- J7n (talk) 00:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Essence"

I have added a section called "Essence" that - hopefully - fulfills the need for a summary. I gues the contrast with ID3 (version 2 and above) tags is part of the essence of APE tags. Rbakels (talk) 11:00, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]