Talk:AK-103

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Indian / Russian & Soviet / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Firearms Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Don't KSA (Saudi Arabia) armed forces also use the AK-103?

Ronbarak (talk) 15:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

What's this about the burst mode? Are you saying that the AK-103 design has the capability for future implementation of a 2 round burst mode, or that the AK-103 can fire in 2 round burst mode in its present form. The AK-103 has three modes like all Kalashnikov's; Safe, Semi, and Auto. --Skyler Streng 08:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, my bad. I was thinking of the AN-94

umm just an fyi, settings are Safe, Auto, and Semi; order sequence, M16 is Safe, semi, and Burst(older models Auto)

Does that mean the other part of the "Design Differences" you added is invalid as well?

No, that part is still correct, AFAIKCynicalMe 19:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Venezuela

I see its listed they received 30,000 of their 100,000 AK-103 order. However news reports are stating they still plan to buy 100,000 of them and this recent trip in July 2006 was to seal the deal and buy jets as well. Is this a seperate deal or continuation of the listed one? [1] --zero faults ^{|sockpuppets|} 20:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to this article at RIA Novosti, dated August 2007, "the Urals-based Izhevsk Mechanical Plant (IMP) earlier fulfilled a contract to supply 100,000 AK-103 assault rifles to Venezuela, and signed a new contract licensing production of Kalashnikov rifles in the Latin American country". -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stub?

I don't see this article as deserving a stub rating, I think the stub flag should be removed. Youssef51 11:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Effective range

Effective range 500m vs. 1000m on russian page... 500 or 1000? 85.25.138.222 (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Boris Yershov[reply]

Image

Who in the hell replace normal image of an AK-103 with picture of some obscure US-made civilian version? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.170.91.227 (talk) 05:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence from Indians AK-103

India got Ak-103 any photo something ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.203.137.14 (talk) 01:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in AK-103

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of AK-103's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "izhmash.ru":

From AK-47: [http://www.izhmash.ru/eng/product/akm.shtml "�фициальный сайт группы предприятий "ИЖМАШ""]. Retrieved 2 October 2014. {{cite web}}: replacement character in |title= at position 1 (help)
From Comparison of the AK-47 and M16: AKM (AK-47) Kalashnikov modernized assault rifle, caliber 7.62mm. izhmash.ru

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on AK-103. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140903080622/http://www.izhmash.ru/eng/product/akm.shtml to http://www.izhmash.ru/eng/product/akm.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AK-103. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Russia and Saudi Arabia have reached a deal allowing the production of the Ak-103 in the Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia to produce Russian Kalashnikovs under new deal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qrmoo3 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

AK-103 Assault Rifle.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]