Talk:2014–15 Chelsea F.C. season

Football: England / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of Chelsea F.C. records and statistics#All-time top goalscorers|all-time top scorer]] The anchor (#All-time top goalscorers) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Orphaned references in 2014–15 Chelsea F.C. season

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2014–15 Chelsea F.C. season's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "released":

From 2014–15 Fulham F.C. season: "Player Departures". {{cite web}}: Text "Fulham Football Club" ignored (help)
From 2013–14 Chelsea F.C. season: "New Youth Scholars in Profile". Chelsea F.C. 6 July 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2014.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:00, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

please change the transfer fee of "PATRICK VAN AANHOLT" from "FREE TRANSFER" to either "undisclosed fee" or "1.5 million pounds".

LB Netherlands Patrick van Aanholt England Sunderland Free 25 July 2014 TO LB Netherlands Patrick van Aanholt England Sunderland 1,500,000pounds 25 July 2014

here are some of the links proving that van aanholt's transfer was not a free transfer. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_van_Aanholt#Sunderland 2. http://www.transfermarkt.com/patrick-van-aanholt/transfers/spieler/52119 3. http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/11368070.Chelsea_defender_completes___1_5m_Sunderland_move/ and many more can be found out on the net. Didierforever (talk) 17:28, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the change to undisclosed and added a source. I could not find a reliable source to support the 1.5 million pounds number, it is unlikely it will be disclosed. Boccobrock•T•C 18:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 July 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

please change the transfer fee of patrick van aanholt from free to 1,500,000 pounds

LB Netherlands Patrick van Aanholt England Sunderland Free 25 July 2014 [54] to LB Netherlands Patrick van Aanholt England Sunderland 1,500,000 25 July 2014 [54] in the transfer section. below are some of the reliable sources which confirm the following. http://www.transfermarkt.com/patrick-van-aanholt/profil/spieler/52119 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_van_Aanholt#Sunderland http://www.transferleague.co.uk/premiership-transfers/chelsea-transfers.html http://www.transferleague.co.uk/football-transfers/summer-2014-transfer-window.html Didierforever (talk) 14:45, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did not put the amount, rather I placed Undisclosed, as per my comment in the request above. Thanks. Boccobrock•T•C 18:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First team squad section

This should be removed as it violates WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Specifically Position, Games Played and Goals Scored. There is no reliable source for these and as such it fails WP:V. I've removed this several times and it's always added back, so please do not re-add again. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 15:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some sections should be removed (not all). Get rid of matches played, goals, transfered from and transfer year. QED237 (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Player position can be sourced from officail webpage. If they list a player as defender he is defender. QED237 (talk) 15:15, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Show me where it says that Nathan Ake can play LB/CB/DM... it's all WP:OR JMHamo (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It specifically says on the Chelsea F.C. website "he is primarily a defender who can play either in the middle or on the left, but is also comfortable in the centre of midfield. [1] I feel that when listed like this from a primary source as WP:OR states it should be allowed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.205.0 (talk) 21:35, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Solanke kit number

Solanke wore the number 35 shirt today, think that needs updating in the new contracts section.[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.59.63 (talk) 16:06, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 October 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Solanke number updated to 35.[3]

78.147.59.63 (talk) 16:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done Stickee (talk) 06:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 October 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Ron Gourley changed to until 22 October [4]

Cfc4ever26 (talk) 15:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The page's protection level and/or your user rights have changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Stickee (talk) 01:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 October 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Attendance of Maribor match was 41,126 [5] Cfc4ever26 (talk) 16:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Stickee (talk) 01:32, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed you now have access to the article. Stickee (talk) 01:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So many issues!

This article has so many problems, I don't even know where to begin. For one thing, the tenses are all over the place, then there's all sorts of weasel words like "Chelsea legend" and "horrific challenge". I've tried to fix what I can, but this is just atrocious writing. Whoever wrote this article should be ashamed of themselves. – Pee Jay 22:51, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above observations, I think the whole article suffers from massive over-production. The month-by-month summaries and the unnecessary positional table that then accompanies it, is one of many examples. There is even the addition of the date and time of release of publication of the PL fixtures. 46.7.85.68 (talk) 20:44, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Appearances table

Cech made 7 league apps, Courtois 32 league apps, Izzy Brown one league app as a sub against West Brom. I'd guess there are other inaccuracies as well. 14.202.164.207 (talk) 03:59, 12 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.202.164.207 (talk) 03:57, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014–15 Chelsea F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150417203801/http://www.capitalonecup.co.uk/fixtures-results/match-report/index.aspx?MatchId=3804535&hometeamid=4&type=report to http://www.capitalonecup.co.uk/fixtures-results/match-report/index.aspx?MatchId=3804535&hometeamid=4&type=report

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014–15 Chelsea F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is Sky Sports a deprecated source?

Hi, on this article, a tag against deprecated sources is called the 144th cited source, one by Sky Sports, a deprecated source. I cannot find that source at WP:RSPSOURCES (a page of a list of perennial sources and how they may be used by Wikipedians for articles), so I am unsure if I should just delete the tag or not. I want to discuss this because I have been unable to find the revision that has added this tag. CarlFilip19 (talk) 19:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]