Talk:2009 Masters Tournament

Image copyright problem with Image:MastersGolfLogo.png

The image Image:MastersGolfLogo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Scores

Shouldn't "68-68-69=205" be "68+68+69=205"? Or is the convention is to use hyphens? –Howard the Duck 05:26, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

The convention is hyphens. Tewapack (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Controversies

Is Harrington's "bad luck" controversial? I don't see a reference stating it is, though the reference does make it a notable event under the appropriate day. CB...(ö) 06:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

• I would include McIlroy's incident to my "not a controversy" list also. I don't have a recommendation for a section title change, but 'Controversies' seems a bit of a stretch. Farmercarlos (talk) 13:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

I'd have to agree with both the statements above. Forgive me for saying it, but it seems that whoever wrote the controversies section seems to dislike the Irish. Bonzostar (talk) 19:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

New table

I just added a table to represent how the field qualified. Would it be helpful to add other information that would otherwise not qualify them (e.g. world ranks for those outside of the top 50?). Furthermore, would it be helpful to format the table to make it sortable? Thoughts, comments, suggestions in general? If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 09:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2009 Masters Tournament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/10/AR2009041003609.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012024707/http://www.masters.com/en_US/discover/past_winners.html to http://www.masters.com/en_US/discover/past_winners.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Tendentious editing by Wjemather

PSA: Wjemather has been stealthily and systematically removing past champions without talkpage discussion or consensus. He is currently in violation of 3RR and Wikipedia:Tendentious editing. Regards Jamahiriya (talk) 08:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)