User talk:Jamahiriya

CS1 error on List of ethnic slurs

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of ethnic slurs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of ethnic slurs

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of ethnic slurs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re-adding past champions and nationalities

Hi, just wanted to let you know that consensus was reached to remove both of these items, in May 2019 and September 2020. pʰeːnuːmuː →‎ pʰiːnyːmyː → ‎ɸinimi → ‎fiɲimi 07:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No talkpage consensus was reached. Not everyone is involved in that WikiProject. The discussion also was not advertised on article talkpage. Golf is a legacy sport. Past champions is extremely important. 2019 was a long time ago. A couple of people in a WikiProject stealthily removing past champions wholesale without advertising discussion on relevant talkpages is not WP:CONSENSUS.--Jamahiriya (talk) 07:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As indicated, there have been multiple centralised discussions which resulted in consensus to remove these tables. If you wish to reach a new consensus, you must first hold a discussion proposing such a change. Persisting with imposing your preference is disruptive. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 07:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your initial wholesale removal was disruptive. Me restoring useful information others painstakingly compiled over decades is not. A few buddies talking on a WikiProject is not WP:CONSENSUS, especially when it was not advertised on article talkpages. Take myself, for example, I edit golf-related article, but I am not involved in this WikiProject. For the record, I have no opinion one way or another on the "nationalities" section. However, golf is a legacy sport. How "past champions" do in major championships is one of the top things people care about the most.--Jamahiriya (talk) 07:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You must stop your disruptive editing and establish consensus for your changes. Failure to do so may result in a block. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 07:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You never established consensus, didn't post anything on article talkpages when you stealthily and systematically removed information. Your lack of adherence of AGF and BRD appalls me. You also already violated 3RR.

You have been directed to two of the discussions where consensus was established. You dont like it, which is fine, but unless and until you gain a new consensus, you must adhere to the existing one. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 07:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They were talks on a WiKiProject. That's not WP:CONSENSUS. You never tried to gain consensus on article talkpage. Heck, you never even bothered posting the discussion on article talkpages. It's not a requirement to join your WikiProject to be able to edit golf-related articles, yet editors who weren't involved in that WikiProject had no way of getting involved in that discussion. Until you try to gain WP:CONSENSUS properly, you don't represent consensus.

You need to learn how consensus works. Centralised discussion is standard and WikiProject talk pages are a normal venue when many related articles are involved; these talk pages are not walled gardens and anyone is welcome to contribute to discussions. Several of the changes you reverted contained edit summaries referring to these discussions so so were incorrect to claim the changes were stealthy and without consensus. You do not get to unilaterally overturn consensus, in this case reached in discussions held before you joined Wikipedia. You should revert your changes now and open discussion to a new gain consensus. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 08:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Calling them "normal venue" is deceptive when lay editors have no way of contributing to these discussions or even knowing they were taking place at all, so in practice, they are in fact "walled gardens" (your words). If you wanted to gain real consensus per WP:CONSENSUS rather than preach to the choir (meatpuppetry), you would have at the very least post about your discussion on the article talkpages. You did not. Anyway, I already opened up several article talkpage discussions about your conduct and you are welcome to defend yourself there. It is a public forum, unlike your WikiProject. Based on your flawed logic, I could start a new WikiProject called WikiProject:PGA right this moment and then claim consensus by talking to myself on my WikiProject talkpage without posting any notice on article talkpages.

Hello

Hello, Jamahiriya. I am one of the names that was mentioned. I was wondering if you would allow some off Wikipedia communication. If you could let me know your email address so I can send you an email, I'd appreciate it. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 13:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. pʰeːnuːmuː →‎ pʰiːnyːmyː → ‎ɸinimi → ‎fiɲimi 18:10, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cite web

Please note that per the instructions in {{cite web}}, the parameter name is "access-date" - "accessdate" is merely an alias, and there is no reason to make that change in existing citations. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 19:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Previous accounts

Hi - another editor has suggested that you previously edited under the username User:IceFrappe. That account is not blocked, and theoretically you would be eligible for a WP:CLEANSTART, but you have been editing in similar subject areas which is not compatible with cleanstarts. If that account was yours, please could you declare the connection and we can move forward on that understanding? Girth Summit _(blether) 14:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put the case on hold for a while. For reference, we are talking about this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IceFrappe. MarioGom (talk) 21:46, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]