Talk:2008 Bulgarian energy crisis

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bulgaria Low‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Renaming

"Crisis" makes it sound as if we're freezing and starving, which isn't true: Bulgargaz has only been threatening to cut gas supplies, but hasn't done so. Change the name to something clearer and more neutral and rewrite the article so that it doesn't sound so misleading. This is not a crisis and it's not likely to ever become one, it's incomparable to the real energy crisis in Central Asia, for instance. Todor →Bozhinov 11:42, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense

The article appears quite inadequate in representing the real situation as is stated in the above comment. Moreover, there are a number of totally false statements in it (one such being the proposed information about the usage of natural gas in the summer) revealing the poor understanding of the problems of gas supply and its utilisation. Besides this, the author seems to be a person possessing limited linguistical skills in the English language. --AceMF (talk) 14:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Moron

Its lingustic skills not "lingustical". Go fucking take a course in English.

SunnieBG (talk) 18:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't change the fact that you *have* to rewrite the article entirely because it is inadequate and it's misrepresenting the truth. There is no crisis and there never was any, simple as that. Todor →Bozhinov 11:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed "too long" tag

Whatever the faults of this article, excessive length is not one of them. It doesn't make sense having a tag that says it is too long. If anything, it needs to be longer. I have therefore removed the tag. Andreclos (talk) 07:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

out of date

Text information ends in September 2008 so it certainly needs to be updated to finish the story. Hmains (talk) 03:49, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]