Jump to content

Talk:2004 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:46, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:46, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:46, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2004 North Indian Ocean cyclone season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 19:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article today. I have a few issues that must be addressed or fixed before I pass it. But great work on the article, overall.--12george1 (talk) 19:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • "The India Meteorological Department in New Delhi" Add IMD after "India Meteorological Department", just like what you did with the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) later in the summary.
  • "This broke the record for the highest daily rainfall total related to a North Indian Ocean cyclone." - I'm confused as to why "highest daily rainfall total" is wikilinked to List of wettest tropical cyclones by country, because that's overall rainfall, not daily totals. While were talking about that article, maybe you should mention that this was the second rainiest tropical cyclone in India?
  • Unfortunately, the source only says highest daily rainfall total. It's still worth wikilinking, as it was a very wet storm, but I don't have sourcing that it's the second wettest Indian cyclone. I hope that makes sense. I wanted to word it properly without any original research or extrapolation. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • "organizing over Gangetic West Bengal near Kolkata" - Is that the right way to say it? Wouldn't it be better to have something like "organizing over the Gangetic section of West Bengal near Kolkata"?
  • "A depression formed out of an area of convection southwest of India on October 1" - Why does this say October 1 if the infobox says September 30?
  • I noticed a few cases of inconsistent and repetitive wikilinking. For example, in BOB 01, India is wikilinked twice, but not at all in the previous section

Thanks for reviewing!! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2004 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2004 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]