Jump to content

Talk:2001 Atlantic hurricane season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2001 Atlantic hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 20, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Image for each storm

[edit]

I am trying to get an image for each storm, like 2005. I have started uploading ones that aren't on Wikipedia yet, and they are listed below. If you find a better image, feel free to replace it.

Should Gabrielle be before Florida or as a hurricane? Can't find ones of Felix, Jerry, or Lorenzo at their peaks. Hurricanehink 21:54, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Got them all. Hopefully they are good enough. Hurricanehink 20:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ACE?

[edit]

At Talk:Accumulated_Cyclone_Energy/Atlantic_by_year are the ACE values I've calculated from the best-track. This conflicts with the ACE given in this article. Why? Is there a source for the data in this article? Jdorje 01:28, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

Fixed vandalism in the Naming sections, where the names were altered (such as "Wendy" becoming "your mama" and "Tanya" becoming "Tj") as well as a few explicit sentences at the end. Jake52 23:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another depression?

[edit]

According to this, there was a depression over canada. But it's possible that it's not a tropical depression, as it doen't say that. What do you people think? íslenska hurikein #12(samtal) 21:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice pic, but no need to mention it. It is clearly extratropical. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Storm section

[edit]

Why can't you just do what all other articles do: put a list of the storms in that section?! Rory (reply on my page!) (talk) 22:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should we go back to the old format? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:36, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge list article?

[edit]

This one slipped by. Should we merge the "list of storms" article? It's highly redundant. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on 2001 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2001 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CCI check

[edit]

I have done only a partial CCI check on this article, from the Tropical Storm Allison FAR. I have started the {{Copied}} template on this page,[1] and attributed the copy from Tropical Storm Allison,[2] but from this edit forward, content copied from other storms needs to be checked and attributed as WP:CWW. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Hurricane Humberto (2001) into 2001 Atlantic hurricane season

[edit]
WITHDRAWN
Withdrawn by nominator. Noah, AATalk 02:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Fails WP:NWX as there was no damage or fatalities from the storm and overall minimal impact. Noah, AATalk 14:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Minor impact. The season article would be greatly improved by absorbing the content from the Humberto article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Does not warrant a standalone article for the reasons stated. This storm's story can be well told within the season article. Drdpw (talk) 21:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep Because I feel that the sailing record mentioned in the article would be removed from 2001 Atlantic hurricane season should a merger proceed. And that is encyclopediac content.--134.6.205.51 (talk) 19:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's not something that should prevent a merger from happening. Opposing due to something that may or may not even happen and should have a discussion (for inclusion or exclusion) in and of itself isn't a valid rationale. Noah, AATalk 16:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep — While it only had minor impacts, it does pass WP:NEVENT. WP:NWX is a helpful guide, but is not full policy/guidelines. Actually, a search on Google Scholar for “Hurricane Humberto 2001” pulled up several academic/research articles including: A Model Study of Gravity Waves over Hurricane Humberto (2001) {2008 case study}, The formation of hurricane Humberto (2001): The importance of extra-tropical precursors {2007 case study}, and The Evolution of Hurricane Humberto (2001) {2014 case study}. Seems clear that while the hurricane had minimal impacts, the hurricane itself is notable and has lasting coverage. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 23:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @WeatherWriter: The question I have with you voting keep on every one of these discussions you are participating in is why should there be an article on an individual storm if it comes at the expense of the season article? Keeping smaller articles on questionably notable storms ends up being bad in the long-run because the season article suffers from a lack of material. Either the articles get merged if it would be beneficial or the season article gets sent to GAR/FAR for not covering the major aspects or not being comprehensive. I will tell you from experience that not every journal should be included in an article (relevance) and that a passing mention does nothing to establish notability. I will also tell you that many of these storms have impact that would fall under WP:ROUTINE since it's expected for minimal damage to occur from either winds or water. While these aren't true fish storms, they are the low-hanging fruit. There are cases where I have not nominated small articles since the season section is fleshed out appropriately and a merge wouldn't be needed. Your choice here, but if you do this on every discussion we have now and in the future in cases where almost everyone else agrees a merge is appropriate, I would consider it to be disruptive towards the goal of improving the encyclopedia. Noah, AATalk 00:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hurricane Noah, I would strongly suggest you strike your direct personal attack against me. I have commented in exactly 3 proposed merges you have started in the last 10 days. Saying "in the future in cases where almost everyone else agrees a merge is appropriate, I would consider it to be disruptive towards the goal of improving the encyclopedia is the exact opposite of how it should be as you should focus entirely on the content and not the editor. If I see any further very well directed and unwarrented attacks against me for commenting in a basic proposed merge discussion that you started, I will go to AN/I as I did nothing wrong. I did not attack you in my comment. I never mentioned a single editor and I focused entirely on the article and on why I think it should be kept. So please, strike your personal attack and focus on the dang content and not on my 3 comments. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 01:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @WeatherWriter: I'm not striking anything. It would be pointless considering it's still there regardless. You quickly commented on these proposed merges in short order, making it look like you were going to oppose every single merger if journals covering something tangentially related to the storm existed. I merely stated what I would consider to be disruptive actions as a caution to not go down that path, not that you have done something disruptive as of this point. Did you read all these ahead of time before making the comments or did you simply find them and post them here? I ask because I'm not certain whether you did so or not since the comments were made in quick succession. Some of the various journals seem like relevant meteorological/impact topics while others do not. Noah, AATalk 01:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposed merge of Hurricane Olga into 2001 Atlantic hurricane season

[edit]
There is a consensus against merging the article. Hurricane Noah (talk) 12:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Fails WP:NWX since the impact was minimal. Other than it being large and lasting a while, the storm isn't very notable. The season section in this article is in dire need of an expansion and merging this article would give it the material it so desperately needs. Noah, AATalk 16:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2001_Atlantic_hurricane_season&oldid=1239346012"