Talk:1st San Marco Regiment

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: National / European / Italian

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

Indian fisherman shootings

In the Italian version of this article they keep blaming on me for adding the equivalent of "Two marines from the San Marco Regiment, Latorre Massimiliano and Salvatore Girone, are currently under the custody of the Indian police, for the shooting of two Indian fishermen, Ajeesh Pinki and Gelastine in 2012 Italian shooting in the Arabian sea". They say that the question is still unclear, bla bla bla, and that the episode is mentioned in another article too. I think the question is a different one. I would call it censorship. Moreover if you look at the contributions provided by such wikipedians, you will see that they write only about army and weapons, so I guess they are not neutral (I think they are soldiers themselves). I marked the Italian article as not neutral, and they removed my remark. The article also mentions a fight between the fascist army and the British army in 1942 or 43. It supports the fascist army and makes fun of the British army (they call a defeat of the British Army "smacco" which is quite an offensive term). Maronnamia84 (talk) 22:33, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

concerns about the inclusion of the episode of shooting of two fishermen in India: on the Italian wikipedia they say it is not relevant for the article about "San Marco Regiment", while here appears on the main article: one of the two versions must be wrong and impartial Pilotodiprova (talk) 09:55, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on San Marco Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080612154245/http://www.greenhowards.org.uk:80/bill-cheall/cheall12.htm to http://www.greenhowards.org.uk/bill-cheall/cheall12.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.greenhowards.org.uk/bill-cheall/cheall12.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]