Talk:1999 Pacific hurricane season

Weather: Tropical / Eastern Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been assessed by editors of the WikiProject.

1999 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 3, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Todo

Fix typos. They are tampant across the article. Hurricanehink 20:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Storm05, will you please use a spell-checker and a grammar checker. All one has to do is search wikipedia for "dissapated" to find a list of articles that you have edited. — jdorje (talk) 20:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Every storm needs sources and a decent meteorological history. Hurricanehink (talk) 04:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Came across this page while browsing the WikiProject, so I thought I'd do some copy-editing. Typos begone! -- wacko2 19:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/hurrclimate.php#1999
- In 1999 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 06:42:35, 404 Not Found
- In 1999 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 23:37:34, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1999 Pacific hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The season officially began on May 15 in the Eastern Pacific, and on June 1 in the Central Pacific; in both basins," just 140W lines here to avoid confusion on why CPAC storms are included in this article. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you are asking me to do here.--12george1 (talk) 20:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The lead is a bit long for EPAC season articles: "Hurricane Dora was the most intense cyclone, with a peak intensity of 145 mph (220 km/h), equivalent to Category 4 hurricane status on the Saffir–Simpson hurricane scale. With a total track length of 6,500 mi (10,500 km), Dora had the second longest track of a Pacific hurricane on record, behind only Hurricane John in the 1994 season." just condense this to "Hurricane Dora was a long-lived an intense cyclone, which had the second longest track of a Pacific hurricane on record". Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done--12george1 (talk) 20:08, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

*Some of the extra details placed here could IMO be placed in the season summary. It summaries the season pretty well,just not inline with the other EPAC seasons. Looks like you already done that; you read my mind :). Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know how many storms received recon? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per the first page of the MWR, "There were no reconnaissance ﬂights into eastern North Paciﬁc tropical cyclones in 1999".--12george1 (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Add the 1 person missing and peak rainfall total to Adrain's section. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed--12george1 (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't Beatriz annular? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently not. [1] [2]--12george1 (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"By this time howeve" comma after time. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but it seems kinda odd, since I have a comma after the next word (however).--12george1 (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"A tropical wave crossed the Atlantic Ocean" why is Atlantic Ocean linked? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed--12george1 (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"reached the Eastern Pacific Ocean" change ocean to basin IMO. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, if you are talking about the one in TD6-E's section.--12george1 (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd touch base on Droa's WPAC history.

Better?--12george1 (talk) 20:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Add a note in Dora's infobox that it left the basin before dissipating. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane

Fixed--12george1 (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any TC watches for Eleven? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, the Preliminary Report does not mention anything watches or warnings.--12george1 (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd add a tad of MX impact to Greg's section. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I already did; roughly 2/3 of that second paragraph is about Mexico.--12george1 (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"There were no known reports of injuries or deaths from the storm.[29]" why is it here then? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed--12george1 (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

" strong mid-tropospheric ridge " link to the ridge article plz. Thanks. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed--12george1 (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"While passing offshore, Irwin brought patches of heavy rainfall to some areas of Mexico, peaking at 9.92 inches (252 mm) in Coahuayutla de Guerrero, Guerrero.[12] T" mentioned this add the end of the paragraph, it's not like it affected multiple places. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed--12george1 (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any TC watches for Irwin? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, the Preliminary Report doesn't say anything regarding that.--12george1 (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fix Ref 3, it is broken. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane

Fixed--12george1 (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Link Avila on Ref 18, not 27 IMO. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed--12george1 (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); and

(c) it contains no original research.

Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 1999 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutnames.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1999 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071213191106/http://www.em-dat.net/disasters/Visualisation/emdat_display_list.php to http://www.em-dat.net/disasters/Visualisation/emdat_display_list.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]