Jump to content

Talk:1994 Pacific typhoon season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1994 Pacific typhoon season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 3, 2008Good article nomineeListed
June 25, 2014Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Todo

[edit]

It needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on it. Also using this as a placeholder for very helpful refs (esp. with PAGASA)... [1][2][3] – Chacor 14:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We've got another problem. One of the others on the TC project told me nearly a year ago that we should not routinely use GMT on these pages, using local time instead. This works out to GMT+9-12 hours, depending upon the location of the tropical cyclone. FYI. Thegreatdr 23:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I asked User:Coredesat and User:Nilfanion about this in IRC. Core pointed out that the official RSMC uses UTC more than it does local time, and Nilf thinks there's less confusion using UTC. Furthermore, it's a large area the Pacific typhoon basin covers, not just GMT 9 - GMT 12, but GMT 7 (Thailand) to GMT 12. – Chacor 01:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do actually like the idea of using UTC. The problem is, I've now used local times in the 1981-1984 as well as 2002-2004 Pacific Typhoon Seasons. We do use something close to local time for the Atlantic articles, which is why I never questioned HurricaneHink's initial suggestion on this matter. At the time, he appeared to be the only one doing work on Pacific typhoon seasons. Thegreatdr 02:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry 'bout that, I was young and restless then. I suppose UTC times are fine, but I personally think that they shouldn't be overused. They are estimates, after all; it's not like a tropical storm became a typhoon exactly at 12 UTC. Plus, most tropical cyclones generally don't have more than one important event in a day. Like, if a tropical depression became a tropical storm on, say July 1, it would probably not become a typhoon until a different day and a super typhoon a few days later. Even if two events did happen on the same day, one could just say "later that day". Hurricanehink (talk) 03:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PAGASA list of storms (placeholder)

[edit]

For easier reference of myself, instead of referring to the text file PAGASA sent me: 

TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE SYSTEM : Statistical Investigation 

Region: Entire Archipelago 0∞N, 110∞E -  30∞N, 150∞E

TC Intensity: TY / TS / TD

Year Range: 1 year/s

1994

Month Range: 12 month/s whole year

Day Range: 31 day/s whole month

Result : 25 TC tracks drawn

0001  >  AKANG     /  TS  /  1994  /  010400  to  010606

0002  >  BISING    /  TS  /  1994  /  033118  to  040900

0003  >  KLARING   /  TY  /  1994  /  051106  to  051612

0004  >  DELING    /  TS  /  1994  /  052218  to  052600

0005  >  EMANG     /  TY  /  1994  /  060406  to  060606

0006  >  GADING    /  TS  /  1994  /  062106  to  062318

0007  >  HELING    /  TD  /  1994  /  062500  to  062606

0008  >  ILIANG    /  TY  /  1994  /  070606  to  071012

0009  >  LOLENG    /  TS  /  1994  /  070912  to  071106

0010  >  MIDING    /  TY  /  1994  /  071400  to  071912

0011  >  NORMING   /  TD  /  1994  /  071706  to  072018

0012  >  OYANG     /  TS  /  1994  /  072418  to  072918

0013  >  PASING    /  TS  /  1994  /  073112  to  080312

0014  >  RITANG    /  TY  /  1994  /  080400  to  080718

0015  >  SUSANG   /  TY  /  1994  /  081700  to  082018

0016  >  TERING     /  TD  /  1994  /  082900  to  083000

0017  >  UDING    /  TY  /  1994  /  083000  to  090112

0018  >  WELING    /  TD  /  1994  /  090706  to  091018

0019  >  YANING    /  TD  /  1994  /  091312  to  091412

0020  >  ANING     /  TY  /  1994  /  092600  to  082700

0021  >  BIDANG    /  TY  /  1994  /  100600  to  100912

0022  >  KATRING   /  TY  /  1994  /  101800  to  102300

0023  >  DELANG    /  TY  /  1994  /  102018  to  103000

0024  >  ESANG     /  TY  /  1994  /  110506  to  110612

0025  >  GARDING   /  TY  /  1994  /  121800  to  122318

– Chacor 14:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I just realised that their AOR then was much bigger than it is now. 0 to 30N, 110E to 150E v.s. 5N to 25N, 115E to 135E. – Chacor 16:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have the email address for where you got that info? I'm interested in doing the same thing for 1997 PTS. Hurricanehink (talk) 04:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I emailed PAGASA's weather chief, Nathaniel Cruz. Contact info is available here. – Chacor 06:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How could this be properly referenced, considering how the information was gathered? It's one of the items holding us back from GAC/GAN/GAR right now. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Matching PAGASA and JTWC names

[edit]

Tropical storm Owen (Bising)

Tropical storm Yunya (Norming)

Typhoon Tim (Iliang)

Tropical storm Sharon (Gading)

Tropical storm Caitlin (Pasing)

Tropical storm Luke (Weling)

Typhoon Teresa (Katring)

Typhoon Axel (Garding)

This website only appears to have event information back to 2002. Thegreatdr (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:35, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:1994 Pacific typhoon season/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
  • There are plenty of dead links on the page, such as ref 4, 7, and a few individual ATCRs.
  • Blank sections for TDs Tering and Yaning.
  • Info for impact is missing for Vanessa, Verne, Wilda, Zelda, and Axel.

I will probably leave this out for a week or two, perhaps a little longer.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 02:37, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Link 2 isn't dead. The dead link 7 has been fixed. A few TCRs is too unspecific...cite the refs which are dead so they can be fixed. If the problems are bad enough for a reassessment, you need to be specific so they can be fixed. This is basically a GA review you've initiated; please treat it as such; vagueness is not an option. If you know of information on Tering and Yaning, show us where it lies, or be bold. Axel, Wilda, Verne, and Vanessa have some impact already -- Axel has more than sufficient content for a season article. Do you know of a source for more impact information for these storms? Zelda doesn't seem to have impacted anywhere. More details, please. Thegreatdr (talk) 18:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weve now got the Beven reports and MWL's, which i will use to improve the article.Jason Rees (talk) 23:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Those could help. =) I didn't initially use those in the preparation...chances are that MWL won't shed any new light on the storm history since the JTWC reports should read very similarly. Jack's reports might have more details. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The ATCR does have info for storms with impact, and maybe it's just me who's getting some of the dead links. I'm going to close the GAR, because there's not much to fix, or could be fixed.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 03:31, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts

[edit]

A search needs to be conducted for Wake Island impact from Li. I dont expect there to be much since the CPHC notes that "some showers but little in the way of winds" were recorded.Jason Rees (talk) 21:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 12 external links on 1994 Pacific typhoon season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1994 Pacific typhoon season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1994 Pacific typhoon season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orchid ARTICLE

[edit]

Guys, Hello, Is it enough to make an Article for Category-4-super typhoon Orchid? It hit Japan as a typhoon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.144.40.17 (talk) 04:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Why is there only 3 separate articles for a typhoon? There's multiple storms that did a lot of damage and deaths, such as Russ, Sharon, Tim, Caitlin, etc. — 😈🥟🦆 04:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can try making an article for one of those storms if you'd like. Just be sure that the articles expand what's already in this season article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:1994_Pacific_typhoon_season&oldid=1252385876"