Jump to content

Talk:1986 Pacific typhoon season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1986 Pacific typhoon season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 7, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Typhoon Wayne

[edit]

What an usual storm! Due to the length of the storm summary here, should it have its own article? It seems fairly notable. Other long lived storms have their own article (Ginger, Faith, John). Regardless, this is a very unknown storm that deserves a little recognition. Hurricanehink 02:26, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I found a little info on Wayne on online searches. I feel fairly confident I can spin out a Wayne article. Jake52 My talk 03:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Think we've waited long enough. Created that article, and shortened Wayne's entry in this article. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Todo

[edit]

It needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is done. Thegreatdr (talk) 06:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Upgrading to C class now that all satellite imagery has been included. Thegreatdr (talk) 17:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Once HKO information is added, we can upgrade to B and submit for GA. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:1986 Pacific typhoon season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi Thegreatdr - I will be reviewing 1986 PTS for GA on an intial readthrough i found a couple of things which i will be pointing out below to you. Jason Rees (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Im Placing this article On Hold for now as there are a couple of issues with the article which i have outlined below - I will also be giving this article a Very Throughy Copyedit later once all the corrections have been done.Jason Rees (talk) 17:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too do

[edit]
  1. "Vera was considered two tropical cyclones by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center after the fact, though it was operationally treated as one by all three warning agencies," - Strange wording esspecially as there are more than three warning agencies within the WPAC.
  2. Since Vera was considered one system by the JMA, im not sure its worthy of two seperate sections
  3. The Infobox for the 2nd JMA Tropical Storm needs the SSHS removing.
  4. Their are numerous problems with the Storm infoboxs in this article
  • For the HKO Depressions add "|WarningCenter=HKO" and change the winds from 1-min to 10-min
  • For the JMA Depressions/ Tropical Storms removed the 1 min winds=

Thats it for now ill give the article a through Copyedit later.Jason Rees (talk) 17:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those problems should now be fixed. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok ive given it a Copyedit and will pass the article Jason Rees (talk) 21:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Track maps needed

[edit]

Three of the tropical depressions from the 1986 Pacific typhoon season, whose track maps are within this document, need maps. Thanks for whatever help you all are able to provide. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a lot of time to do these, but 95 percent of the work is formatting the data into HURDAT format. If anyone wants other track maps, format them and put them where someone with a working copy of the program can copy the data. Keep in mind that the template at Commons doesn't have any options for tracks generated from other warning center data. The track map program also doesn't include that pink color or the light aquamarine color because it only works with 1-minute data. Also, track maps from other warning centers can look quite jerky because they don't all smooth them out like NHC or JTWC. Potapych (talk) 21:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good to know. Here are the four tracks I need:

00010 07/20/1986 TROPICAL STORM 00020 07/20*1882482 30 1000*1962488 30 998*2032494 35 996*2082498 35 996* 00030 07/21*2152504 35 996*2182511 35 996*2202516 30 998*2252523 0 998* 00040 07/22*2272530 0 998*2272533 0 998*2272536 0 998*2262540 0 1002* 00050 07/23*2282546 0 1004*2302550 0 1002*2302550 0 1002*2352555 0 1002* 00060 07/24*2402560 0 1004*2402570 0 1004*2402580 0 1004* 0 0 0 0* 00070 TS 01010 08/09/1986 TROPICAL DEPRESSION 01020 08/09* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*1742467 25 998*1772474 25 998* 01030 08/10*1792481 25 998*1832487 25 997*1882490 25 996*1932496 25 996* 01040 08/11*1922505 25 995*1912527 30 994*1962524 30 994*2042530 30 996* 01050 08/12*2202535 25 997* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 01060 TD 02000 09/02/1986 TROPICAL DEPRESSION 02010 09/02*3002200 30 992*3092207 30 992*3212214 30 992*3372217 30 993* 02020 09/03*3512210 30 996*3612201 30 997*3802190 30 998*4042177 25 998* 02030 TD 03010 11/25/1986 TROPICAL DEPRESSION 03020 11/25*0812497 30 1002*0832500 30 1002*0862502 30 1002*0902502 30 1002* 03030 11/26*0932500 30 1002* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 03040 TD

Despite the look, it is in the proper format if you copy from the source code of this page. I'm not completely helpless. =) Thegreatdr (talk) 22:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:16, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1986 Pacific typhoon season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1986 Pacific typhoon season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]