Talk:1934 Bolivian coup d'état

1934 Bolivian coup d'état was nominated as a Warfare good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 23, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Bolivia Mid‑importance

	Bolivia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoliviaWikipedia:WikiProject BoliviaTemplate:WikiProject BoliviaBolivia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: South America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	South American military history task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1934 Bolivian coup d'état/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Catlemur (talk · contribs) 18:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Krisgabwoosh: I will begin this review shortly.--Catlemur (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add a reference to Note a.

The coup happened within the context of the Chaco War. I think the article would benefit greatly from a paragraph about said war so that the information could be better contextualized.

"Salamanca's questionable military decisions" - Can you provide some examples?

You need to add a United States public domain tag for all the images in the article.

"The authors of the coup" - Reword this.

Quotes that are longer than forty words or a few hundred characters should be enclosed in "blockquote" per MOS:BLOCKQUOTE.

Remove the second wikilink for La Razón.

How did the coup affect the course of the war?

What was the reaction of neighbouring nations to the coup?

Footnotes 10 should be pp. 75–76 instead of p. 75–76.

Remove the Refbegin and Refend indentation from Bibliography.

The titles of all sources that are written in a language other than English need to be translated (including footnotes 22 and 23).

Mention that Jayucubas: comentarios y cronicas de la Guerra del Chaco is written in Spanish like you do in the rest of the Bibliography.--Catlemur (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you could have at least told me that you are not interest in continuing with the review. Oh well.--Catlemur (talk) 09:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh gosh, apologies. For some reason I was not notified of the original review. I'd be happy to make the necessary changes if you'd be willing to reopen the nomination. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 09:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Krisgabwoosh: You got a talkpage notification about the review and I pinged you after you failed to respond a week later. Go ahead and adress the issues I highlighted. You can renominate the article if you need to.--Catlemur (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]