Jump to content

Talk:1925 Atlantic hurricane season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1925 Atlantic hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 11, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Strongest storm

[edit]

85 knots = 100 mph = 155 km/h Jdorje 04:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

85 knots = 98 mph = 157 km/h Tropische Storm Sven 18:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reanalysis

[edit]

I noticed the updates, but the following should be the listed pressures:

Storm 1 - 987 mbar, based on the 70 kt winds at the time of the two 994 measurements (the rule of thumb is to knock 1 mb off for every 10 kt).

Storm 2 - 1012 mbar, based on the 35 kt winds at the time of the 1015 measurement (lowest while tropical).

Storm 3 - 1002 mbar, based on land obs (no closer measurements or wind data).

Storm 4 - 990 mbar, based on the 60 kt winds at the time of the 996 measurement.

CrazyC83 (talk) 14:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where these come from, but I was moving things around while you were editing. I am done with this page, so it's safe to change them. Potapych (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I usedthe lowest pressures recorded in the raw data files from HURDAT. Unless you have a reliable source for those pressures, they can't be used as it is OR. (comment by Cyclonebiskit) 32.138.57.84 (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Crazy, do you know where those are from? The strongest storm is disputed between #1 and #4 (and I'm leaning toward #1). Potapych (talk) 01:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
They used the standard rules from the measurements in the Reanalysis files, although you're right, the ≤(listed lowest) makes more sense. CrazyC83 (talk) 18:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]