Talk:1912 Giro d'Italia

1912 Giro d'Italia has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 15, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cycling: Giro d'Italia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Giro d'Italia task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Translation

I can see that this was translated from a different language, probably Italian;) It needs some grammar fixes. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 08:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1912 Giro d'Italia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 11:11, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this. Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:11, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Changes from...

"In response to the..." - in response to what?

Fixed. Disc Wheel (T + C) 05:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"...how the new points system operated"

Fixed. Disc Wheel (T + C) 05:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the last sentence of this paragraph, change the tense into Conditional "would they know", also stage instead of state

Fixed. Disc Wheel (T + C) 05:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Race overview

No need to repeat ref #7 three times over, the one at the end is enough.

I prefer to cite after each sentence for better recall when looking at the article after a long hiatus. Disc Wheel (T + C) 05:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And the end of the first paragraph: "...Carlo Galetti finishing third, ..."

Fixed. Disc Wheel (T + C) 05:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Second paragraph: "By the time" - it is unclear what time is meant.

Fixed. Disc Wheel (T + C) 05:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth paragraph: "...start of the sixth stage at 6:40 local time".

Fixed. Disc Wheel (T + C) 05:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Note 1 should cite a source, right now, I cannot see where you take the information from which stages contained mountains. This should not be OR.

I took it from the Bike Race info source that mentions each mountain if there was one, I cited it in the table title instead. Disc Wheel (T + C) 05:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll place the article on hold for 7 days. Good work so far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed everything, this article was a pain to write, hardly any info out there. Disc Wheel (T + C) 05:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Disc Wheel: Sorry, it completely went past me that you had taken care of this already. Passed now, good job! Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]