Talk:1861 Maryland gubernatorial election
 | A fact from 1861 Maryland gubernatorial election appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:03, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that federal troops intervened in the 1861 Maryland gubernatorial election? "The election is progressing quietly. Gen. DIX this morning issued an instruction to the judges to allow no man to vote who took part or bore arms in the April riot, or who refuses, when challenged, to take an oath of fidelity to the Government." from: "The Election in Maryland, Page 8". The New York Times. No. 7 November 1861. Newspapers.com. 7 November 1861. and "three days later McClellan authorized Major General John Dix to gather in Baltomore the 4th Wisconsin, the 2nd Massachisetts Ligjt Artillery and a Pennsylvania cavalry company ... Gen. Dix's assignment was to assure that the Eastern Shore's elections be protected from Rebel interference and safe for Unionist candidates ... Gen. Dix ordered his Wisconsin, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania units to march down the peninsula to the Virginia border to 'give protection to the Union men ... [and] prevent the migration or importation of [secessionist] voters ... view a view to carry the election" from: Olson, Gordon L. (14 May 2014). The Notorious Isaac Earl and His Scouts: Union Soldiers, Prisoners, Spies. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 22–23. ISBN 978-0-8028-6801-5.
- ALT1: ... that men who refused, when challenged, to take an oath of loyalty to the government were not permitted to vote in the 1861 Maryland gubernatorial election"The election is progressing quietly. Gen. DIX this morning issued an instruction to the judges to allow no man to vote who took part or bore arms in the April riot, or who refuses, when challenged, to take an oath of fidelity to the Government." from: "The Election in Maryland, Page 8". The New York Times. No. 7 November 1861. Newspapers.com. 7 November 1861.
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 07:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, well written, cited, and free of copyvio. Hooks cited in article and a QPQ has been conducted. I have a question about ALT1's phrasing-- it says "who refused to take an oath of loyalty" when the source says "when challenged" which I think is a little different. Thoughts, Dumelow? Eddie891 Talk Work 13:29, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review Eddie891. Indeed, some people who would have refused to take the oath undoubtedly got by without challenge. I have updated the hook and article to reflect the "when challenged" part - Dumelow (talk) 14:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- I think this is now gtg, thanks!
Eddie891 Talk Work 14:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- I think this is now gtg, thanks!
- Thanks for the review Eddie891. Indeed, some people who would have refused to take the oath undoubtedly got by without challenge. I have updated the hook and article to reflect the "when challenged" part - Dumelow (talk) 14:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
