Leco language

Not to be confused with Leko languages.

Leco
Leko, Rik’a
Native to	Bolivia
Region	La Paz Department (Bolivia): east of Lake Titicaca
Ethnicity	2,800 Leco (2001)
Native speakers	20 (2001)
Language family	Language isolate (Puquina? Sechura–Catacao?)
Official status
Official language in	Bolivia
Language codes
ISO 639-3	lec
Glottolog	leco1242
ELP	Leco

Leco, also written as Leko, is a language isolate that, though long reported to be extinct, is spoken by 20–40 individuals in areas east of Lake Titicaca, Bolivia. The Leco ethnic population was 13,527 in 2012.

Classification

Although Leco is generally considered to be a language isolate, Kaufman (1994: 64) groups Leco together with the Sechura–Catacao languages as part of a proposed Macro-Lecoan family. It has, also, been, suggested that Leco might be grouped with the extinct Puquina languages spoken in the south shore of Lake Titicaca.

Language contact

Jolkesky (2016) notes that there are lexical similarities with the Kulle, Omurano, Taushiro, Urarina, Arawak, Cholon-Hibito, Jaqi, and Quechua language families due to contact.

Background

History

Apart from some brief lists of vocabulary, the main document for which Leco is known is a Christian doctrine compiled by the missionary Andrés Herrero at the beginning of the 19th century. That doctrine was published in 1905 by Lafone Quevedo, who used it as a source to make a grammatical description of the language. That work was virtually the only available document about Leco, until the linguist Simon van de Kerke (1994) located some speakers of the language and compiled some additional facts which enlarged the analysis of Quevedo.

Use and description

In Grimes (1988), Leco is classified as a language isolate and is considered extinct. However, Montaño Aragón (1987) found some speakers of the language in the region of Atén and in Apolo, La Paz, in Franz Tamayo Province in the Bolivian department of La Paz, along Mapiri River in Larecaja Province (situated also in the department of La Paz).

Some speakers were relocated by van de Kerke (1994–97). These speakers, mostly men, were older than 50 years and had not habitually used the language since a long time before that. Van de Kerke relates that the speakers do not feel sufficiently secure to conduct a conversation spontaneously in Leco.

Phonology

In regard to the phonology of Leco, one can point out the following (based on van de Kerke, 2009: 289–291).

Leco has six vowel phonemes: /a/, /e/, /i/, /o/, /u/ and /ɨ/. The opposition among the first five vowels is distinguished in the data, but the opposition between /e/ and /ɨ/ is found only in a limited number of words, as for example pele 'balsa' and pèlè 'name of plant'.

Consonants

		Bilabial	Alveolar		Post- alveolar	Velar	Glottal
			plain	sibilant
Nasal		m	n			ŋ
Plosive/ Affricate	voiceless	p	t	t͡s	t͡ʃ	k
	aspirated	pʰ	tʰ			kʰ
	ejective	pʼ	tʼ		t͡ʃʼ	kʼ
	voiced	b	d
Fricative	voiceless		s				h
	voiced		z
Approximant			l		j	w
Flap			ɾ

Morphology

In regard to the morphological characteristics of Leco, one can point out the following (van de Kerke, 2009: 297–313).

• Leco is a highly agglutinative language and it uses predominantly suffixes.
• In regard to morphology of nouns, nouns have inflection for number, by means of the pluralizing suffix -aya, as in choswai-tha-aya [woman-DIM-PL] 'little women', and inflection for case, as for example the genitive -moki, which is used with alienable entities like kuchi 'perro' in yo-moki kuchi [1SG-GEN] 'mi perro'; the dative -(i)ki, which indicates direction or goal, as in (1); the locative -ra or -te, which marks a locative complement or a directional locative, as in (2); the ablative -rep / -bet, which indicates the locativee origin, as in (3), etc.

(1)

seneng-ki

all-DAT

hu-ku-ate

3PL-dar-PAS.1

dulsi

candy

seneng-ki hu-ku-ate dulsi

all-DAT 3PL-dar-PAS.1 candy

‘To all I gave a candy.’

(2)

u

what

trabajo-ra

work-LOC

chera

we

abon-da-no-ne

find-FUT--INT

lamka-sich-ne

work-INF-TOP

u trabajo-ra chera abon-da-no-ne lamka-sich-ne

what work-LOC we find-FUT-NML-INT work-INF-TOP

‘In what work are we going to find work (in the town)?’

(3)

lilwo

grasshopper

ubus-no-te

come out--

lal-rep/lal wara-rep

earth-ABL/earth interior-ABL

lilwo ubus-no-te {lal-rep/lal wara-rep}

grasshopper {come out-NML-DCL} {earth-ABL/earth interior-ABL}

‘The grasshopper comes out from the earth / from within the earth.’

• Nouns can be combined, furthermore, with a set of derivative suffixes, as, for example, the diminutive -tha, which besides being combined with substantivees, as in won-tha [house-DIM] 'little house', is combined also with adjectives, as is seen in (4). Another derivative suffix which affects nouns is the 'delimitative' -beka, which expresses the idea of 'no more', 'only', as is seen in (5). Leco has also deverbative derivative suffixes (which derive nouns from verbs), as, for example, the infinitivizer -sich in (6), which derives an infinitive form which functions as the subject of a sentence; and the agentive -no, which form derived nouns which express an agentive, such as lamas-no [work-AG] 'worker'.

(4)

wesra

Guanay

nos-tha-te

far-DIM-

wesra nos-tha-te

Guanay far-DIM-DCL

‘Guanay is a little far.’

(5)

yo-phos-beka

1SG-daughter-DEL

ho-ra

this-LOC

t’e-no-te

live--

yo-phos-beka ho-ra t’e-no-te

1SG-daughter-DEL this-LOC live-NML-DCL

‘My daughter no longer lives here.’

(6)

lamka-sich

work-INF

yu-gustas-in-te

1.O-please-NEG-

lamka-sich yu-gustas-in-te

work-INF 1.O-please-NEG-DCL

‘Working does not please me.’

• In regard to verbal morphology, verbs have inflection of person, which is formed by means of suffixes which mark the person of the subject and prefixes which mark the object, as is shown in (7).

(7)

ya-ache-ki

1SG-father-GEN

yo-moki

1SG-GEN

aycha

meat

yin-k’o-a-ka-te

1.BEN-eat--AUX-

ya-ache-ki yo-moki aycha yin-k’o-a-ka-te

1SG-father-GEN 1SG-GEN meat 1.BEN-eat-PF-AUX-DCL

‘My father has eaten the meat for me.’ (I was not able to eat any more)

• As is seen in Figure 2, besides inflection for person, the verb in Leco can be combined with a series of inflectional suffixes (which mark, for example, distinctions of aspectual-temporal type). By way of example, (8) shows the use of the suffix of indirect knowledge (CID) -mono, which is combined with the verb moch 'say' from which it has been derived.

Figure 2: Inflection of the verb

Verbal root	PROG	NEG	NML/N/ADJ	PL	CID	AUX	PAS	DCL/INT	Person
									-o
			Adj/N					-t	-m/-n
				-aya	-mono	-ka	-taah
V	-cha	-in	-no					-ne	-am/-an
		-ir	-a						-no(h)
			-ich						-s

(8)

era

I

fuerza-hote-to:

strength-POS-PRS.1

ya-ache-ki-ka

1SG-father-GEN-COMP

mo-no-mono-taah-te

say---PAS-

era fuerza-hote-to: ya-ache-ki-ka mo-no-mono-taah-te

I strength-POS-PRS.1 1SG-father-GEN-COMP say-NML-CID-PAS-DCL

‘It is said that he said "I have strength like my father".’

• In regard to the category of mood, in Leco one uses suffixes like -kama 'power', -bibi 'almost', among others, to indicate a possible event, as is seen in (9). Leco has, besides, two forms of imperative of the second person, one directed to only one person and another directed to various persons, as is seen in (10a) and (10b).

(9)

chika

very

es-cha-no-te

rain-PRS--

lamkas-in-kama-te-am

work-NEG-work--PL.1

chika es-cha-no-te lamkas-in-kama-te-am

very rain-PRS-NML-DCL work-NEG-work-DCL-PL.1

‘It is raining heavily; we can not work.’

(10a)

iya

you (singular)

ta

maize

bal-a

plant-IMP

iya ta bal-a

{you (singular)} maize plant-IMP

‘Plant maize (corn)!’

(10b)

heka

you (singular)

ta

maize

bal-noku

plant-IMP.PL

heka ta bal-noku

{you (singular)} maize plant-IMP.PL

‘(You [plural]) plant maize (corn)!’

• Verbs in Leco can be combined, besides, with a set of derivational suffixes, related to aspect, as for example the completive -hi in (11), to distinctions of movement, as, for example, the modifying suffix of movement wari- in (12), and to valence, as for example the reciprocal suffix -mo in (13) and the causative -ki in (14).

(11)

yo-moki

1-GEN

warsuch

trousers

tiltil-hi-no-te

undone---

yo-moki warsuch tiltil-hi-no-te

1-GEN trousers undone-CMPL-NML-DCL

‘My trousers have been completely broken.’

(12)

wotha

hill

wonon-wari-no-te

caminar-subir.por.tierra--

wotha wonon-wari-no-te

hill caminar-subir.por.tierra-NML-DCL

‘He/she is walking up the hill.’

(13)

yobas-aya

man-PL

yanapas-mo-no-aya-te

help-REC--PL-

dihwo

peanut

bal-ich-ki

plant-INF-DAT

yobas-aya yanapas-mo-no-aya-te dihwo bal-ich-ki

man-PL help-REC-NML-PL-DCL peanut plant-INF-DAT

‘The men are helping each other to plant peanuts.’

(14)

o-botha-tha-ki

2-brother-DIM-DAT

do-ko-ki-a

3.O-take-CAUS-IMP

o-botha-tha-ki do-ko-ki-a

2-brother-DIM-DAT 3.O-take-CAUS-IMP

‘Make him take your (singular) little brother!’

In Leco, one sees productive processes of reduplication. With substantives, reduplication can be interpreted as 'a heap/much of', with adjectives, 'a high degree of'; with verbs the interpretation is very diverse and not always transparent; thus we have the reduplicate verb tiltilkach 'to be undone', derived from tiltil 'undone', which expresses a state or process, for which reason it is combined also with the auxiliary kach 'to be'.

Speech

In regard to the characteristics of spoken Leco, one can point out the following:

• As van de Kerke (2009: 315) points out, the order of the constituents is not fixed, although, in general, the subject takes the first position, especially if it involves a topicalized element. Besides, the object often precedes the verb, as is seen in (15):

(15)

hino

this

yobas-ne

man-TOP

palanta

platano

soh-cha-no-te

look at-PR--

moki-a

GEN-3

choswai-ki

wife-DAT

hino yobas-ne palanta soh-cha-no-te moki-a choswai-ki

this man-TOP platano {look at-PR-NML-DCL} GEN-3 wife-DAT

‘This man is searching for platano for his wife (of another).’

• Leco is a pro-drop language; this means that an explicit pronominal subject is not required, although this can appear as in (16) (chera 'we'):

(16)

chera

we

du-kama-tean

speak-can-1PL

Burua

Leko

da-in-tean

want-NEG-1PL

du-ch

speak-INF

chera du-kama-tean Burua da-in-tean du-ch

we speak-can-1PL Leko want-NEG-1PL speak-INF

'We can speak Leco, but we do not want to speak it.

• In Leco, one sees simple and compound speech (van de Kerke, 2009: 316–324). In regard to simple speech, diverse types are distinguished, such as, for example: existential speech, as (17), declarative speech, as (18), interrogative speech, be it confirmative, as (19a), or informative, as (19b), among others.

(17)

aycha

meat

ne-no-te

exist--

aycha ne-no-te

meat exist-NML-DCL

‘There is meat!’

(18)

wesra

Guanay

nos

far

na-in-tha-te

be-NEG-DIM-

wesra nos na-in-tha-te

Guanay far be-NEG-DIM-DCL

‘Guanay is very near.’

(19a)

sok’och

food

da-no-ne

want--INT

iya-n

you.SG-INT

sok’och da-no-ne iya-n

food want-NML-INT you.SG-INT

‘Do you (singular) want to eat?’

(19b)

ha-ne

who-INT

busa-cha-no-n

arrive-PRS--INT

ha-ne busa-cha-no-n

who-INT arrive-PRS-NML-INT

‘Who is arriving?’

• In regard to compound speech, diverse types are also distinguished: juxtaposed speech, as (20), coordinate speech, as (21), and subordinate speech (causal, concessive, temporal, conditional, consecutive), as (22):

(20)

on

that

chelas-no

become sick-

yobas-ne

man-TOP

k’o-in-te

eat--

wet-ra-no-te

die-FUT-

on chelas-no yobas-ne k’o-in-te wet-ra-no-te

that {become sick-NML} man-TOP eat-NML-DCL die-FUT-DCL

‘That sick man is not eating; he is going to die.’

(21)

on

that

chelas-no

become sick-

k’o-in-te

eat--

no

not

ko-in-te

drink--

wet-ra-no-te

die-FUT-

on chelas-no k’o-in-te no ko-in-te wet-ra-no-te

that {become sick-NML} eat-NML-DCL not drink-NML-DCL die-FUT-DCL

‘That sick man is neither eating nor drinking; he is going to die.’

(22)

ch’epe

ill

yin-soncho-a-ra

1.BEN-become sick--LOC

katre-te

cot-LOC

bar-ka-cha-no-to:

lying-AUX-PRS--PRS.1

ch’epe yin-soncho-a-ra katre-te bar-ka-cha-no-to:

ill {1.BEN-become sick-PF-LOC} cot-LOC lying-AUX-PRS-NML-PRS.1

‘Because I feel ill I am lying on a cot.’

Lexicon and classes of words

In regard to the lexicon and the classes of words in Leco, one can mention the following (van de Kerke, 2009: 293–297):

• In Leco, four major categories of words are distinguished: noun, adjective, verb, and adverb. Besides, the language has a group of minor categories: names of people, personal pronouns, deictic pronouns, numerals, interrogative pronouns, etc.
• Nouns are characterized morphosyntactically by constituting the nucleus of a noun phrase and by allowing inflection of number and case. Some nouns or substantives in Leco are won 'house' and phose 'daughter'.
• In regard to the pronouns, Leco distinguishes four types: personal pronouns, such as era 'I', iya 'you (singular)', kibi 'he/she'; demonstrative pronouns, such as hoo 'this, near the speaker', on 'that, near the addressee' and hino 'that, far from the speaker and the addressee'; interrogative pronouns, such as ha 'who', u 'what', nora 'where'; and indefinite pronouns, expressed by means of dubitative phrases, composed of an interrogative pronoun and the suffixes -as 'also' and -ka 'como'.
• Leco has a large number of adjectival lexemes, which are characterized by expressing qualities of entities. Thus we have, for example, lais 'bueno', suma 'small'.
• Leco has a decimal numeral system, composed of the following units: her 'one', too 'two', chai 'three', dirai 'four', bercha 'five', berphahmo 'six', toiphahmo 'seven', ch'aiphahmo 'eight', beepila 'nine', and beriki 'ten'. The numbers six to eight follow a system in base five, as in Aymara: 6 = 5 + 1, etc.
• Leco has a limited number of adverbial lexemes, as, for example: kumte 'late', ch'eka 'yesterday', china 'very'. Also, it has a group of postpositions, which express location and which are combined easily with the case markers, such as hekor 'out', apor 'near', haz 'down'.
• In regard to the verbs, these are characterized by functioning as the nucleus of the verbal phrase and by receiving inflectional suffixes of time and person, besides having a series of derivational suffixes. Apart from the auxiliaries neck and kach, Leco has intransitive, transitive, and ditransitive verbs. A typical characteristic of this language is that of giving much attention to the position of objects. It manifests itself, for example, in the following verbs, which always combine a noun expressing a position with the auxiliary kach 'to be': chelkach 'to be laid halfway over an object', lewakach 'to be hanging', chakach 'to be sitting', etc.

Vocabulary

Loukotka (1968) lists the following basic vocabulary items for Leco.

gloss	Leco
one	ver
two	foi
three	chishai
head	barua
eye	bisiri
hand	bu-eú
woman	chusna
water	dua
sun	heno
maize	ta

External links

• Diccionario etnolingüístico y guía bibliográfica de los pueblos indígenas sudamericanos: LEKO Alain Fabre, 2005 (in Spanish)
• Lenguas de Bolivia (online edition) Provides information about a number of indigenous languages in Bolivia, such as Leko.
• Leco transcriptions of GlobalRecordings audio files