Jump to content

Jonathan Skrmetti

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jonathan Skrmetti
28th Attorney General of Tennessee
Incumbent
Assumed office
September 1, 2022
GovernorBill Lee
Preceded byHerbert Slatery
Personal details
Born1977 (age 46–47)
New London, Connecticut, U.S.
Political partyRepublican
EducationGeorge Washington University (BA)
Hertford College, Oxford (BA)
Harvard University (JD)
Signature

Jonathan T. Skrmetti (born 1977) is an American attorney and public official. He currently serves as the 28th Attorney General and Reporter for the state of Tennessee.

Education

[edit]

Skrmetti earned degrees from George Washington University and Hertford College, Oxford. While earning his Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School, he served as the editor-in-chief of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy.[1]

Career

[edit]

Skrmetti previously clerked for Judge Steven Colloton on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.[1] As an adjunct professor, he taught cyberlaw at the University of Memphis Cecil C. Humphrey's School of Law. Before entering private practice, Skrmetti served as a federal prosecutor for almost a decade, first with the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, and then as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Memphis[1] from 2011 to 2014.[2] Skrmetti was also a partner at Butler Snow LLP in Memphis.[3]

He was one of eleven Tennessee attorneys who applied to fill the vacancy on the Tennessee Supreme Court when Justice Cornelia Clark passed away in 2021,[4] before serving as Chief Counsel to Governor Bill Lee from December 2021 to August 2022.[2][5]

Chief Deputy Attorney General

[edit]

Jonathan Skrmetti served as Chief Deputy Attorney General under Herbert H. Slatery III from December 2018[6] through December 2021.[2][7]

Arguing against Instagram Kids

[edit]

AG Slatery's office had attempted to specifically investigate Instagram back in 2021[8] and TikTok in 2022.[9] Skrmetti, as Chief Deputy Attorney General, argued against the then-planned Instagram for kids only, stating that the platform would be a means of having children become accustomed to social media when they are "psychologically vulnerable."[10]

See Children on Social media below for information on similar ongoing investigations.

Attorney General of Tennessee

[edit]

Skrmetti was appointed by the Tennessee Supreme Court to serve an eight-year term on August 10, 2022, and was sworn in on September 1, 2022.[11] Tennessee is the only state in the country where the State Supreme Court appoints the attorney general as a non-partisan member of the Judicial Branch.[12]

In a September 2022 interview, Skrmetti said that because he would not need to be concerned with maintaining office through an election, he would be allowed to focus on his job, which he defined as "to be a good lawyer." He also stated that it is not within the purview of the AG's office to "make policy" while also acknowledging that based on the response from physicians, "there's room for some clarification" in the wording of the abortion statute, also known as the Human Life Protection Act.[13]

In his role as AG and Reporter of Tennessee, Skrmetti has instituted a strategic litigation unit with ten attorneys to focus on pending litigation involving the federal government, various Tennessee municipalities, and to focus on corporate activity within the state.[14] Regarding the special unit, Skrmetti stated, "I don't think that it's a partisan move to attempt to enforce the state's interests in affirmative litigation against the federal government. I think it's a part of the dynamic tension of separation of powers that keeps our system going and keeps everybody free."[15] However, he also stated, "Whichever party is in power in the White House, you can expect to see a lot of activity with the Attorneys General of the other side."[16]

Environmental issues

[edit]
State of Tennessee v. 3M et al.
[edit]

On May 31, 2023, Skrmetti filed suit against twenty-one named manufacturers of products using PFAs and ten unnamed. The suit focuses on the manufacture and sale of AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam) throughout the state rather than on the various consumer products which contain PFAs.[17] Skrmetti contends that the manufacturers not only knew about the risk PFAs pose to both organisms and the environment, but that they also concealed the level of harm the chemicals could cause in order to raise their profits.[18] The suit further claims that some of the named companies attempted to protect themselves from liability through fraud.[19][20]

The suit seeks both actual damages for not only the cleanup required to the environment and property in Tennessee, but also for the cost of investigating to prove the harm that has been done.[21][22][23] This cost would be substantial, as evidenced by 3M's settlement of a different lawsuit over PFAs to multiple public water systems for $10.3 billion.[24]

LGBTQ issues

[edit]
VUMC investigation
[edit]

An investigation that began prior to Skrmetti being sworn in as AG involved obtaining medical records from Vanderbilt University Medical Center.[25] Stating that the records are part of a fraud probe, Skrmetti vowed, "[T]his investigation is directed solely at VUMC and related providers and not at patients or their families.”[26] The records obtained focus solely on transgender clinic patients,[27] which has prompted the ACLU to file a lawsuit against Skrmetti[28] for a law passed in Tennessee that prevents minor patients from receiving gender-affirming healthcare treatment.[29] Governor Lee's response on Twitter was to state that the purpose of the law is to "[protect] children from permanent, life-altering decisions."[30] The federal Department of Justice has also challenged the law denying gender-affirming care.[31][32]

Numerous patients received an e-mail from VUMC nearly one year after the records were provided to the AG, informing patients that the State of Tennessee has obtained their medical records.[33] Information provided to the AG included the names of patients referred to the VUMC transgender clinic and the names of the providers who referred them, including those who opted not to receive care.[34] VUMC did release a statement to notify patients and the public that the AG has a legal right to such records during an investigation, and that their release of the information did not violate HIPAA.[35] A statement from House Democratic Caucus Chair John Ray Clemmons excoriated Skrmetti for what Clemmons perceived to be a misuse of the AG's authority in order to promote a political agenda.[36][37]

The impetus behind both the law and the investigation into potential fraud at VUMC stems from a series of Tweets and videos posted by Matt Walsh.[38][39] VUMC maintains that Walsh misrepresented the care they provide, and that they will provide care in compliance with state law.[40]

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals granted an emergency appeal from the State on July 8, 2023, temporarily overturning a lower court ruling that provided an injunction against the State in the case United States v. Skrmetti which prohibits hormone therapy for trans youth.[41][42] The ruling from Judge Sutton is in place while an appeal plays out. On November 6, 2023, the United States filed a petition for the Supreme Court to hear this case on appeal.[43] The Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 24, 2024.[44]

Two patients have since sued VUMC, claiming,"People should be able to feel comfortable sharing their personal medical information with their doctors without fear that it will be handed over to the government."[45] The lawsuit goes on to state that the hospital's "failure to safeguard the privacy of its patients is particularly egregious," and mentions the fact that VUMC only notified patients of the state having their medical records after the information came to light during the case filed by L.W.[46] The suit further alleges that Skrmetti had a "target list" consisting of 106 patients when he contacted VUMC to request the records.[47] It was filed July 24, 2023 in Nashville Chancery Court. The plaintiffs are seeking class certification so that all affected patients can be included as litigants.[48]

Opposing changes to Title IX
[edit]

Shortly after being sworn into office, AG Skrmetti issued a letter to the US Department of Education in opposition to adding "gender identity" to the wording of Title IX.[49]

In January 2023, he filed a brief[50] in support of a 2022 injunction against a sports competition under West Virginia's 2021 "Save Women's Sports Act"[51] preventing transgender students from participating in athletics on teams of "the opposite biological sex".[52] The focus of the WV law is on transfemale athletes, claiming that their assigned gender at birth provides them an unfair advantage thus undoing the very protections established by Title IX.[53]

The US DOE proposed a rule on April 13, 2023, to prevent schools from enacting blanket bans against trans athletes participating in sports teams aligning with their gender identity.[54] AG Skrmetti responded on May 15, 2023, in a letter to DOE Secretary Cardona in which he argued that the proposition violated both Title IX and the US Constitution.[55] This measure followed the passage of TN Senate Bill 2153 / House Bill 2316[56] on May 6, 2022.[57] The newly signed law extended a 2021 measure requiring high school athletes to prove their biological sex before participating in team sports to public universities across Tennessee.[58] The legislation has been described as "discriminatory and harmful" and "an attack on the LGBTQ+ community".[59] Supporters of Skrmetti's efforts have responded that "it’s about protecting women’s sports" and not transphobia.[60]

Friends of George's v. State of Tennessee
[edit]
Main article: Friends of George's v. State of Tennessee
See also: Tennessee Adult Entertainment Act

In March 2023, the LGBTQIA theatre company Friends of George's filed lawsuits against the State of Tennessee, AG Skrmetti, and Shelby County DA Steve Mulroy.[61][62] The suits argued that the vague language of a new state law restricting public drag performances (defining drag performers as cabaret and likening drag shows to strip clubs[63]) made it impossible to know what activity exactly it intended to curtail, especially in how the state law might be infringing on First Amendment protected speech.[64][65][66][67] When Judge Thomas Parker ruled on June 2, 2023, that the law did violate Constitutionally protected speech,[68][69] he pointed out that it was "substantially overbroad" despite the State's argument that the law would only apply to "expressive content that is harmful to a reasonable 17-year-old".[65][66][70]

Skrmetti had been a named defendant in the suit,[66] and joined filings before Judge Parker reached his decision: a motion to dismiss the case due to failure to state a claim and a motion to dismiss due to lack of jurisdiction.[71] Both of these motions were granted as Skrmetti was determined to be acting in his role as AG. Skremtti has filed a Notice of Appeal of Judge Parker's decision, pointing out that the same language Parker found to be vague is present throughout the Tennessee Code.[72][73]

Hannah Miyamoto v. Bill Lee, et. al.
[edit]

Retired attorney Hannah Miyamoto (registered with the Hawaii bar) filed suit against Bill Lee, AG Skrmetti, and Davidson County DA Glenn R. Funk (all named) on March 8, 2023, in the Southern District of California, where she currently resides. The suit has been assigned Tennessee case number 3:23cv-00233.[74] She alleges that the TAEA, which AG Skrmetti has held is still in effect throughout Tennessee except in Shelby County,[75] prevents her from being able to perform her play, Twelve Nights with Viola and Olivia, in Nashville at TPAC. The play is based on Shakespeare's Twelfth Night, or What You Will, in which one of the main characters, Viola, spends the majority of the play impersonating a man. The case is currently pending.[76][77][78]

Governor Lee has stated that he is deferring to Skrmetti with respect to whether the TAEA is enforceable outside of Shelby County.[79]

Consumer protection

[edit]
Ticketmaster
[edit]
Main article: 2022 Ticketmaster controversy

After ticket sales for Taylor Swift's Eras Tour rose to as much as $28,000 per ticket on Ticketmaster,[80] Skrmetti opened an investigation into possible violations of antitrust laws, saying that the issue consumers experienced in obtaining tickets might be an indication of not enough competition,[81][82] though Ticketmaster and LiveNation's merger has been approved through 2025 by the US Department of Justice.[83] The incident did result in the DOJ once again probing the companies for breach of antitrust laws.[84] A statement from one of Ticketmaster's shareholders stated that the fiasco was caused by bots,[85] which may have put the company in violation of a 2008 bot-ban law passed in Tennessee.[86]

One area of concern Skrmetti said would be investigated was whether Ticketmaster/LiveNation profited off of the sales of the tickets twice,[87] as well as what consumers were promised regarding ticket availability.[88] Skrmetti clarified that the concern isn't that everyone who wants a ticket be able to purchase one, but that Ticketmaster made specific claims regarding the service they offer and the quality of that service, and because there is little to no competition, Ticketmaster has no incentive to provide what was promised.[89]

Though there hasn't been an official update from the AG's office since December 14, 2022,[90] Skrmetti did tell Time magazine in January 2023 that the investigation is still ongoing and that the evidence found so far "is not entirely consistent" with Ticketmaster's statement that their large market share is due to the difference in quality between their system and "the next best primary ticketing system."[91] When opening the investigation, Skrmetti stated, "If it's a consumer protection violation and we can find exactly where the problems are, we can get a court order that makes the company do better."[92]

State of Tennessee et al v. AdoreMe.com
[edit]

Thirty-one states and the District of Columbia filed suit against AdoreMe.com in response to consumer complaints, alleging unfair trade practices against the retailer. Specifically at issue was the VIP program, in which customers were automatically charged a monthly fee of $39.95 unless they either made a purchase or logged into their account.[93] The state AGs argued that the program was deceptive as it did not properly disclose the terms, and customers were charged the monthly rate without understanding they would be required to take action before the sixth of every month to avoid the fee. Additionally, those who attempted to cancel their memberships found it extremely difficult and were forced to forfeit accrued store credit in order to do so. The retailer also misled consumers regarding discounts with a "countdown" that didn't actually affect purchase eligibility.[94][95]

The suit settled in June 2023, with the blanket amount of $2.35 million to be paid amongst the thirty-one states and D.C.[96][97][98] and refunds to be offered to the affected customers. AdoreMe.com was required to contact all eligible customers as part of the settlement agreement. As with many suits of this type, the retailer admits no wrongdoing as part of the settlement.[95][99]

Letter to FCC regarding robocalls and robotexts
[edit]

Twenty-eight state AGs filed a letter on June 6, 2023, with the FCC asking them to clarify consent as it pertains to telemarketing robocalls and texts.[100] The letter was in response to CG 02-278[101] and CG 21-402.[102] The latter stated that network providers are required to block texts that can be found on a reasonable Do-Not-Originate list; that is to say, unallocated numbers that are spoofed for the purposes of contacting consumers.[103] The FCC scheduled a meeting on June 8, 2023, to discuss the former, which specifically pertained to express consent,[104] and the commission's comment period for the proposed changes ends on July 31, 2023.[105] The proposals so far presented are (1) to ensure that revoking any prior consent is not burdensome; (2) that it is honored within twenty-four hours; (3) that consumers are only required to request a company cease contact one time; and (4) that cell phone users are able to stop unwanted communications directly with their service provider.[106]

The AGs letter asserts that consent for contact should be limited to the consent given by the consumer to the company they are in contact with, eliminating the 'blanket consent' provided by using the website of a company like Assurance Insurance (the example used by the AGs), which requires consumers to agree to being contacted by their 2100 partner companies in order to get an insurance quote. The AGs point out that this is supported by language already existing in the TCPA.[107] They further show that the business guidance published in 2008 states that written permission for a third party, such as their given example with Assurance, is not permitted.[108]

A similar request for comments in March noted that some of the problems consumers face are not calls from numbers that are disconnected, but rather calls from individuals spoofing a legitimate business's number, or calls from individuals claiming to be affiliated with a legitimate business that are really attempts at phishing in order to scam consumers.[109]

Skrmetti filed suit against Michael D. Lansky, LLC, d/b/a Avid Telecom, on May 23, 2023, as a result of 200,000,000 calls to Tennesseans on the Do Not Call registry received from the company between December 2018 and January 2023.[110]

Children on social media
[edit]
See also: Social media § Debate over addiction, Connectivity (media) § Culture of connectivity, Psychological effects of Internet use § Effects on children, Social media and psychology § Depression, TikTok § Underage users, Restrictions on TikTok in the United States § States, and WeChat § Ban and injunction against ban in the United States

In 2023, the Attorney General's office put out a request for the public of Tennessee to share information regarding their children's experiences with harm on social media. The platforms being investigated for promoting harmful content to children are TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, SnapChat, and YouTube/YouTube Kids. A series of town hall-type meetings were held in March 2023 to discuss the impact of social media on children.[111][112][113][114] The contentions are that social media has caused a rise in both depression and anxiety in children; that social media causes long-term trauma by promoting isolation and judgment; and that the executives of social media platforms have exploited children by promoting the issues caused by social media for financial gain.[115][116][117]

At the beginning of March 2023, Skrmetti filed a Motion to Compel with the Chancery Court in Davidson County with respect to the request for information that had been made in 2022. According to the motion, the information TikTok provided was "nearly incomprehensible."[118] Forty-seven attorneys general, including Skrmetti, have launched a coordinated effort to investigate the platform.[119] On April 14, 2023, Governor Lee signed SB0834[120] (which then became public chapter 152)[121] banning TikTok - and any other video platform headquartered in China, such as WeChat and Sina Weibo - from being accessed on university campus networks. The apps can still be accessed while physically on campus, but users require their own connection (e.g. their cell phone data plan) in order to do so.[122][123][124][125]

As of August 2023, the investigation is ongoing.

Co-signed letters to businesses

[edit]
Fortune 100 letter
[edit]

On July 13, 2023, he spearheaded[126] a letter co-signed by the Attorneys General of Alabama (Steve Marshall), Arkansas (Tim Griffin), Indiana (Todd Rokita), Iowa (Brenna Bird), Kansas (Kris W. Kobach), Kentucky (Daniel Cameron), Mississippi (Lynn Fitch), Missouri (Andrew Bailey), Montana (Austin Knudsen), Nebraska (Mike Hilgers), South Carolina (Alan Wilson) and West Virginia (Patrick Morrisey) directed to the CEOs of Fortune 100 companies[127] referencing the Supreme Court decision to overturn Affirmative Action with respect to Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v President and Fellows of Harvard College).[128][129] The letter enjoins the CEOs of these companies to eliminate any bias in their hiring practices, which is defined within the letter's body as "discriminating on the basis of race, whether under the label of 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' or otherwise."[127] This letter is seen as controversial by many, with Fortune reporting that Greg Hoff, associate counsel for the HR Policy Association, pointed out that the SCOTUS decision does not affect hiring practices.[130] Pauline Kim, a professor at Washington University School of Law, also concludes that the decision has no effect on hiring practices.[131] MTSU's Kent Syler concurred, adding, "This is a situation where government is stepping into private business and telling them how they need to do their hiring."[132]

The HR Policy Association did file an Amicus brief[133][134] on the SCOTUS case, and after the decision was handed down by Chief Justice Roberts, they did reaffirm their commitment to DEI hiring practices for "nearly 400 of the largest employers in the United States."[135]

Reverend Al Sharpton responded to the letter, saying that the AGs can attempt to "bully companies, but they cannot make us buy from people who don't hire or won't do business with us."[136] Some perceive this letter as an attack on DEI policies and those who support them.[137][138] Among the recipients of the letter are Memphis-based FedEx and Nashville-based HCA Healthcare. Both companies have inclusivity practices publicly available on their websites. Tennessee state representatives pointed out that there are only eight African-American CEOs in Fortune 500 companies, and expressed some concern over how the letter seems to be intent on forcing government into the boardroom, a position that the Republican party has traditionally advocated against.[139]

In contrast, Skrmetti is quoted as saying that there are many other options available to corporations to help "disadvantaged people and communities of all races without resorting to crude racial line-drawing."[140][141] To bolster their argument against DEI, the AGs cited sections of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The Tennessee Lookout adds that the letter also goes so far as to equate trying to hire a diverse work force with slavery: "In an inversion of the odious discriminatory practices of the distant past, today’s major companies adopt explicitly race-based initiatives which are similarly illegal."[132]

On July 19, 2023, Democratic Attorneys General in 20 states and the District of Columbia responded with their own letter to the Fortune 100 companies, claiming the legal arguments of Skrmetti's letter are dubious, and stating outright that the July 13 letter "is an attempt to intimidate the businesses and workers of America."[142][143] They also noted that the employment goals cited in the letter sent by the Republican Attorneys General are not 'quotas' and are therefore permissible under the law. Raúl Torrez, AG for New Mexico, was quoted as saying that those signing on with Skrmetti's letter "have distorted the recent ruling from the Supreme Court and stretched the rationale in this case."[144]

Investigation into Nashville DA Glenn Funk

[edit]

On February 10, 2023, the AG's office issued a letter to Davidson County district attorney Glenn Funk informing him that an investigation had been opened into whether Funk violated state wiretapping laws in installing surveillance cameras as security measures inside the DA offices.[145] DA Funk responded in a letter dated February 13, saying that the devices were installed in response to actual threats of violence against employees in the office, including one incident when police arrested a man outside the offices after he issued threats of both physical and sexual violence to two employees.[146] He also argued, "We have never conducted any unauthorized audio or video recording of any area where a person has a legitimate expectation of privacy."[147]

The investigation arose out of reports first released by News Channel 5 Nashville investigative journalist Phil Williams where their source for the installation of the devices, Jim Berryman, informed Williams that Funk had requested the microphones be installed into the cameras because the DA wanted have the ability to listen to protestors' conversations that might take place outside the DA's office.[148][149]

Skrmetti's office obtained a search warrant, executed on March 24 by Tennessee Bureau of Investigation agents. Funk had stated that an "invitation" had been extended to the TBI and the AG's office, adding, "We are pleased they are finally here and we expect their investigation will find nothing inappropriate, much less illegal."[150] Funk's office also issued a statement regarding the use of the word 'wiretapping,' saying, "That term implies our office did something wrong, which we did not. ‘Wiretapping’ requires judicial authorization. What we have are ‘Ring-like’ cameras, like you and your viewers probably have at their homes."[151]

As the investigation has continued, Funk has joined a motion filed by Scripps Media to have the court documents related to the seizure of evidence at Funk's office unsealed.[152] In the motion, Funk's attorney does state that Skrmetti obtained the search warrant after the AG's office and the TBI had already been invited to DA Funk's offices. He goes on to state that the unsealing of the evidence used to obtain the warrant "will confirm that any probable cause for this search warrant was predicated on either one or more individuals providing false information to law enforcement or a misapplication of the law" in his joinder motion.[153] Funk has also stated that a former assistant prosecutor with the Nashville DA's office is working on the investigation against him with AG Skrmetti's office, an allegation that the AG's office has denied.[154] Scripps argued before Judge Jennifer Smith that the public had a right to know, which assistant AG Cody Brandon said would interfere with the ongoing investigation. She has not yet issued a ruling stating that it may need to be referred back to Judge Cheryl Blackburn, the criminal court judge who issued the warrant.[152]

Exiting AG Alliance

[edit]

In May 2023, Skrmetti's office received a letter from the Attorneys General Alliance, providing an invoice for membership dues in the organization. Skrmetti's Chief of Staff, Brandon Smith, responded to the letter on May 17, 2023, declining to continue membership in the AGA, alleging that the organization is no longer a nonpartisan group. The deputy executive director of the alliance, Tanie Maestas, replied that they were unaware of any partisan concerns about their sponsors.[155] Only Tennessee and Wisconsin are currently listed as not being a part of the AGA.[156]

Recognition from private organizations

[edit]

In May 2023, Skrmetti accepted an award from the Tennessee Faith & Freedom Coalition, who proclaimed him a "Defender of Freedom" for his work as AG.[157][158] The group is a self-proclaimed conservative, Christian, anti-Marxist organization.[159]

Publications

[edit]
  • Skrmetti, Jonathan (7 June 2023). "Here's our plan to sink Biden's war on household appliances". Fox News.
  • Skrmetti, Jonathan (15 June 2020). "Symposium: The triumph of textualism: 'Only the written word is the law'". SCOTUSblog.
  • Cavedon, Matthew P.; Skrmetti, Jonathan (24 September 2018). "Party Like It's 1935?: Gundy v. United States and the Future of the Non-Delegation Doctrine". Federalist Society.
  • Skrmetti, Jonathan T. (20 January 2017). "The Government Knowledge Defense To The False Claims Act After Universal Health Services". Butler Snow. Mondaq.
  • Skrmetti, Jonathan T. (2016-06-06). "Ransomware: Electronic Extortion For A Digital Era". Butler Snow. Mondaq.
  • Skrmetti, Jonathan T. (10 July 2015). "Making Straight The Road: Case Litigation Plans As A Means Of Efficiency And Predictability In The Tennessee Business Court". Butler Snow. Mondaq.
  • Parker, Stephen C; Skrmetti, Jonathan T (Summer 2013). "Pimps Down: A Prosecutorial Perspective on Domestic Sex Trafficking". The University of Memphis Law Review. 43 (4): 1013–1045. ProQuest 1372487453.
  • Skrmetti, Jonathan T (Summer 2002). "The keys to the castle: A new standard for warrantless home searches in United States v. Knights". Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. 25 (3): 1201–1213. ProQuest 235206576.

Personal life

[edit]

He is married and has four children, and resides in Franklin, Tennessee.

In May 2023, he was elected to the board of the Jason Foundation, Inc., a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that attempts to provide support and educational tools for youth at risk of suicide.[160] He had previously been an ambassador of the foundation.[161]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Royse, Mary Alice (2022-09-01). "Jonathan Skrmetti sworn in as Tennessee's 28th Attorney General". News Channel 4 Nashville. Retrieved 2023-08-07.
  2. ^ a b c Satterfield, Jamie (2022-08-10). "Tennessee Supreme Court taps Skrmetti for Attorney General". Tennessee Lookout. Retrieved 2023-08-07.
  3. ^ "Tennessee Supreme Court Selects Jonathan Skrmetti As Attorney General | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts". www.tncourts.gov. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  4. ^ Elliott, Stephen (2021-11-22). "11 apply for Supreme Court vacancy | Former U.S. attorney, embattled Nashville judge among high court hopefuls". Nashville Post. Retrieved 2023-07-27.
  5. ^ Elliott, Stephen (2021-12-08). "Supreme Court candidate takes job in governor's office | AG aide is Lee's new top lawyer". Nashville Post. Retrieved 2023-07-27.
  6. ^ "Tennessee Bar Association - Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Faculty profile". Tennessee Bar Association | Continuing Legal Education. Retrieved 2023-08-08.
  7. ^ "Skrmetti Takes Over Tennessee Attorney General Office". U.S. News & World Report. Associated Press. 2022-09-01. Retrieved 2022-10-21.
  8. ^ "AG Slatery Leads Nationwide Investigation Into Instagram's Impact on Young People". www.tn.gov. Retrieved 2023-08-07.
  9. ^ Royca, Mary Alice (2022-03-02). "Tennessee Attorney General investigates mental illness impacts of Tik Tok". WSMV-TV. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  10. ^ "AGs Urge Zuckerberg to Halt Plans for Kids' Instagram | OnTargetNews.com". On Target News. The Bowman Media Company. 2021-05-16. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  11. ^ Timms, Mariah (August 10, 2022). "Tennessee Supreme Court taps Gov. Lee adviser Jonathan Skrmetti for attorney general seat". The Tennessean. Retrieved 21 October 2022.
  12. ^ "Supreme Court". Tennessee Courts. Retrieved October 21, 2022.
  13. ^ Gainey, Blaise (2022-09-29). "Tennessee's new attorney general says he's a lawyer, not a politician. Here's how he sees his role on issues like abortion". WPLN-FM. Retrieved 2023-07-29.
  14. ^ Stockard, Sam (2023-05-04). "Attorney General beefs up office to take on feds, cities". Tennessee Lookout. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  15. ^ Sher, Andy (2022-08-16). "Tennessee Democrats critical of selection of Republican Jonathan Skrmetti as new state attorney general | Chattanooga Times Free Press". Chattanooga Times Free Press. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  16. ^ Podsiedlik, Megan, "In Conversation: Jonathan Skrmetti (Tennessee's Attorney General) - The Pamphleteer's Weekly Podcast", The Pamphleteer Podcast, approximately 2:45-2:54, retrieved 2023-07-18
  17. ^ "CASE NO. 23C1259" (PDF). 2023-05-31. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  18. ^ "TN Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti Sues More Than 20 PFAS Manufacturers". www.tn.gov. 2023-06-29. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  19. ^ WTVC (2023-06-29). "Manufacturers who create 'forever chemicals' in Tennessee sued by state's attorney general". WTVC. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  20. ^ D'Abrosca, Peter (2023-06-30). "AG Skrmetti Files Lawsuit Against Massive Chemical Companies for Negative Health Effects on Tennesseans". Tennessee Star. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  21. ^ Mealins, Evan (2023-06-29). "Tennessee sues chemical companies over 'forever chemicals' contaminating state's waters". The Tennessean. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  22. ^ McAlee, Hope (2023-06-29). "Tennessee AG sues manufacturers of firefighting foam containing 'forever chemicals,' including 3M, DuPont". WATE-TV. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  23. ^ "CASE NO. 23C1259" (PDF). 2023-05-31. pp. 69–74.
  24. ^ "3M pays $10.3bn to settle water pollution suit over 'forever chemicals'". The Guardian. 2023-06-22. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  25. ^ Housler, Kaitlin (2023-06-22). "Tennessee AG's Office Issues Statement Further Clarifying Reports of VUMC Handing over Medical Records of Transgender Patients". Tennessee Star. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  26. ^ Kruesi, Kimberlee; Mattise, Jonathan (2023-06-21). "Tennessee attorney general says seeking clinic's transgender patient records part of fraud probe". AP News. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  27. ^ Davis, Chris (2023-06-22). "Tennessee Attorney General requests transgender clinic patient records in Medicaid fraud probe". WTVF. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  28. ^ "L.W. v. Skrmetti". American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  29. ^ Kruesi, Kimberlee (2023-04-26). "US sues Tennessee over ban on care for transgender youth". AP News. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  30. ^ Lee, Bill (2023-04-26). "Gov. Bill Lee". Twitter. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  31. ^ "Office of Public Affairs | Justice Department Challenges Tennessee Law that Bans Critical, Medically Necessary Care for Transgender Youth | United States Department of Justice". www.justice.gov. 2023-04-26. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  32. ^ Herner, Hannah (2023-04-27). "Feds move to block Tennessee's youth trans health care ban". Nashville Post. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  33. ^ Bacallao, Marianna (2023-06-23). "'I'm definitely feeling scared': Transgender patients want answers after Tennessee's AG obtained their medical records". wpln.org. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  34. ^ Wadhwani, Anita; Stockard, Sam (2023-06-22). "AG made sweeping demands for Vanderbilt transgender clinic records as part of fraud inquiry". Tennessee Lookout. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  35. ^ Morgan-Rumsey, Camruinn (2023-06-20). "State obtains transgender patient medical records, kept Vanderbilt investigation confidential for almost a year, officials say". WVLT. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  36. ^ "'It's creating a lot of anxiety' | Nashville hospital turns over transgender patient records to state Attorney General". WBIR. 2023-06-22. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  37. ^ Sells, Toby (2023-06-22). "Lawmaker Blasts State AG In Trans-Care Investigation". Memphis Flyer. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  38. ^ Gooch, Kelly (2022-09-21). "Tennessee attorney general vows to investigate claims against VUMC transgender health clinic". www.beckershospitalreview.com. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  39. ^ Herner, Hannah (2023-06-20). "VUMC hands over transgender patient records to state". Nashville Post. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  40. ^ Communications, VUMC News and. "Statement about transgender health care at VUMC". Vanderbilt University. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  41. ^ Barakat, Matthew (2023-07-09). "Tennessee can enforce ban on transgender care for minors, court says". Williamson Herald. Associated Press. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  42. ^ Morris, Chuck (2023-06-30). "Tennessee AG files motion for emergency stay to overturn transgender health injunction". News Channel 4 Nashville. Retrieved 2023-07-27.
  43. ^ "Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the case United States v. Skrmetti" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. November 2023.
  44. ^ "Supreme Court will take up state bans on gender-affirming care for minors". AP News. 2024-06-24. Retrieved 2024-06-24.
  45. ^ Wadhwani, Anita (2023-07-26). "Patients sue Vanderbilt for releasing transgender clinic records to Tennessee AG". Tennessee Lookout. Retrieved 2023-07-27.
  46. ^ Mattise, Jonathan (2023-07-25). "Transgender Patients Sue Hospital For Giving Records To Tennessee's Attorney General". HuffPost. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  47. ^ Cavendish, Steve; Daryani, Connor (2023-07-25). "Suit: AG had target list of transgender patients". Nashville Post, Nashville Banner. Retrieved 2023-07-27.
  48. ^ Kane, Christopher (2023-07-28). "Vanderbilt sued over sending trans records to Tennessee AG". Los Angeles Blade. Retrieved 2023-07-29.
  49. ^ West, Emily (2022-09-12). "New Tennessee AG opposes placing 'gender identity' into Title IX law". WTVF. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  50. ^ "pr23 05 Brief | PDF | Title Ix | Standing (Law)". Scribd. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  51. ^ "HB 2917 Text". www.wvlegislature.gov. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  52. ^ Mojica, Adrian (2023-01-27). "Tennessee defends injunction to halt to transgender sports competition, use of facilities". WZTV. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  53. ^ "TN Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti Joins Amicus Brief Filed with U.S. Supreme Court in Support of Fairness in Women's Sports". www.tn.gov. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  54. ^ "Federal Register :: Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance: Sex-Related Eligibility Criteria for Male and Female Athletic Teams". Federal Register. Office for Civil Rights, Department of Education. 2023-04-13. Retrieved 2023-07-16.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  55. ^ "Ma23 27 Letter | PDF | Title Ix | Gender". Scribd. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  56. ^ "Tennessee General Assembly Legislation". wapp.capitol.tn.gov. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  57. ^ "Public Chapter No. 1005" (PDF). Tennessee Secretary of State Files. 2022-04-25. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  58. ^ Staff, LA Blade Digital (2022-05-10). "Tennessee bans collegiate Trans athletes". Los Angeles Blade: LGBTQ News, Rights, Politics, Entertainment. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  59. ^ Luneau, Delphine (2022-05-06). "Human Rights Campaign Condemns Governor Lee For Signing Extensions to Last Year's Prohibition on Transgender Students Playing School Sports". Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  60. ^ Rosales, Joshua (2023-06-27). "Women's Sports Are Still Under Threat In Tennessee (Op-Ed)". The Tennessee Conservative. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  61. ^ "Federal judge temporarily blocks Tennessee's anti-drag law". AP News. 2023-04-01. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  62. ^ "Case 2:23-cv-02163-TLP-tmp" (PDF). Free Law Project. 2023-03-31. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  63. ^ Roush, Ty. "Trump-Appointed Judge Rules Tennessee's Drag Ban Unconstitutional". Forbes. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  64. ^ Kennin, Lydian (2023-03-31). "Non-profit theater company sues DA Mulroy over drag legislation". WMC-TV. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  65. ^ a b "Case 2:23-cv-02163-TLP-tmp" (PDF). Free Law Project. 2023-06-02. p. 13. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  66. ^ a b c "Friends of Georges, Inc. v. Steven J. Mulroy, 2:23-cv-02176 - CourtListener.com". CourtListener. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  67. ^ "Take Their Crowns: Conservatives' Subtly Sinister[1] Criminalization of Drag and Gender Expression". University of Baltimore Law Review. 2023-04-28. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  68. ^ Gans, Jared (2023-06-03). "Federal judge rules Tennessee restrictions on drag shows unconstitutional". The Hill. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  69. ^ "Trump-appointed judge says Tennessee anti-drag law is unconstitutional". The Guardian. Associated Press. 2023-06-03. Retrieved 2023-07-23.
  70. ^ McCall, Holly (2023-06-03). "Federal Judge overturns Tennessee's ban on drag shows". Tennessee Lookout. Retrieved 2023-07-23.
  71. ^ "Friends of Georges, Inc. v. Steven J. Mulroy, in his official and individual capacity". Justia Dockets & Filings. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  72. ^ Kennin, Lydian (2023-06-30). "State AG appeals federal judge's decision to allow public drag shows in Tennessee". WMC-TV. Retrieved 2013-07-16.
  73. ^ "Case 2:23-cv-02163-TLP-tmp Document 94" (PDF). TN.gov. 2023-06-30. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  74. ^ "Miyamoto v. Lee et al". Justia Dockets & Filings. Retrieved 2023-07-24.
  75. ^ Sainz, Adrian; Kruesi, Kimberlee (2023-06-06). "Ruling on Tennessee's anti-drag law leaves questions about enforcement, next steps". PBS. Retrieved 2023-07-20.
  76. ^ Sampson, Dee (2023-02-24). "DRAG BILL LAWSUIT ALERT: I'm about to sue Tennessee, and you can too!". Daily Kos. Archived from the original on 2023-02-26. Retrieved 2023-07-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  77. ^ Sampson, Dee (2023-03-05). "UPDATE: Tennessee anti-Drag Bill Lawsuit to be filed this week!". Daily Kos. Archived from the original on 2023-03-07. Retrieved 2023-07-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  78. ^ Gomes, Paula (2023-03-06). "Left Threatens Lawsuits After Lee Signs Bills Protecting Children From Gender Mutilation & Exposure To Sexually Provocative Drag". Tennessee Conservative. Retrieved 2023-07-24.
  79. ^ Stockard, Sam (2023-06-06). "Governor hands drag show court case to attorney general". Tennessee Lookout. Retrieved 2023-07-20.
  80. ^ Richwine, Lisa (2022-11-16). "Taylor Swift resale ticket prices soar past $28,000 amid fan frenzy". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2022-11-17. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  81. ^ Ighodaro, Omose (2022-11-16). "Tennessee, North Carolina AGs Investigating Taylor Swift Ticket Presale". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  82. ^ Hearing, Alice (2022-11-17). "Taylor Swift's Eras presale disaster sets off investigation into Ticketmaster over possible antitrust violations". Fortune. Archived from the original on 2022-11-17. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  83. ^ McLaughlin, David; Gilblom, Kelly (2019-12-19). "Live Nation Surges on U.S. Settlement Over Ticketmaster Deal". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  84. ^ Sisco, Josh (2022-11-18). "DOJ probing Live Nation and Ticketmaster for antitrust violations". Politico. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  85. ^ Taylor, Chloe (2022-11-18). "Bots helped drive Taylor Swift ticket fiasco, Ticketmaster's largest shareholder says". Fortune. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  86. ^ Kruesi, Kimberlee (2022-11-19). "Taylor Swift tickets breakdown probed by attorneys general". APNews. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  87. ^ Da Silva, Chantal (2022-11-17). "Tennessee AG investigating Ticketmaster after Taylor Swift ticket chaos". CNBC. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  88. ^ Bartiromo, Maria (2022-11-23). "Ticketmaster may require a 'government intervention': Tennessee AG Jonathan Skrmetti". Fox Business. 0:34-1:10. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  89. ^ Bartiromo, Maria (2022-11-23). "Ticketmaster may require a 'government intervention': Tennessee AG Jonathan Skrmetti". Fox Business. 1:54-2:21. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  90. ^ "Tennessee Attorney General Skrmetti Releases New Statement Regarding Ticketmaster". www.tn.gov. Retrieved 2023-08-07.
  91. ^ Racker, Mini (2023-01-24). "What Happened During Congress' Hearing on Ticketmaster and the Taylor Swift Concert Mess". Time. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  92. ^ Jackson, Jon (2022-11-17). "Could Ticketmaster's Taylor Swift Fiasco Result in a Federal Probe?". Newsweek. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  93. ^ Dobrosielski, Chelsea (2023-06-23). "Amazon and Adore Me Stumble on Subscriptions". Sourcing Journal. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  94. ^ TFL (2023-06-20). "Adore Me Reaches $2.35M Settlement Over "Deceptive" Marketing". The Fashion Law. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  95. ^ a b Stempel, Jonathan (2023-06-16). "Adore Me lingerie retailer settles US states' deceptive billing claims". Reuters. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  96. ^ Alegre, J. P. (2023-06-21). "Exposed: Online Lingerie Retailer Pays Millions To Settle Deceptive Marketing Claims". the deep dive. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  97. ^ Santoni, Matthew (2023-06-16). "Lingerie Co. Inks $2.3M Deal In 31 States Over Recurring Fees - Law360". www.law360.com. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  98. ^ Housler, Kaitlin (2023-06-20). "Tennessee AG Skrmetti Secures Settlement Payout from Lawsuit Against Online Retailer". Tennessee Star. Retrieved 2023-07-23.
  99. ^ "Settlement Agreement, DocuSign: 0FD3876A-ABD2-4D16-BB17-890B17D27DF8" (PDF). Truth in Advertising (organization). 2023-06-09. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  100. ^ "Reply Comments of 28 State AGs, CG Docket Nos. 21-402 & 02-278" (PDF). Constant Contact. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  101. ^ "Notice of Proposed Rulemaking CG Docket No. 02-278" (PDF). Federal Communications Commission. 2023-06-09. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  102. ^ "Notice of Proposed Rulemaking CG Docket No, 21-402" (PDF). Federal Communications Commission. 2022-09-27. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  103. ^ "Targeting and Eliminating Unlawful Text Messages: A Rule by the Federal Communications Commission on 04/11/2023". Federal Register :: The Daily Journal of the United States Government. 2023-05-11. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  104. ^ "Open Commission Meeting Thursday, June 8, 2023: A Notice by the Federal Communications Commission on 06/07/2023". Federal Register :: The Daily Journal of the United States Government. 2023-06-07. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  105. ^ "Prior Express Consent Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991: A Proposed Rule by the Federal Communications Commission on 06/29/2023". Federal Register :: The Daily Journal of the United States Government. 2023-06-29. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  106. ^ Fox, Russell H.; Garvin, Jonathan P. (2023-07-03). "Telephone and Texting Compliance News: Commission Seeks to Clarify and Codify Calling Consent Requirements". The National Law Review. Volume XIII, Number 199. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  107. ^ "105 Stat. 2394 - Public Law 102-243, 102d Congress" (PDF). Congress.gov. 1991-12-20. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  108. ^ "Complying with the Telemarketing Sales Rule | Telemarketing Calls That Deliver Prerecorded Messages". Federal Trade Commission. 2023-05-31. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  109. ^ "FCC 23-21 | REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING | in re: CG Docket No. 21-402 and CG Docket No. 02-278" (PDF). Federal Communications Commission. 2023-03-17. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  110. ^ Stoop, Tristyn (2023-05-23). "Lawsuit filed against company over alleged robocalls". News 7 Jackson. Retrieved 2023-07-23.
  111. ^ Ewoldt, Julia (2023-03-16). "Has your child been negatively impacted by social media? Tennessee Attorney General asks for public input". The Jackson Post. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  112. ^ "Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti Hosts Town Hall Meetings to Discuss Big Tech's Impact on Children". www.tn.gov. Retrieved 2023-08-07.
  113. ^ Housler, Kaitlin (2023-03-31). "Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti to Host Town Hall Meetings Across Tennessee Focusing on Big Tech's Impact on Children". Tennessee Star. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  114. ^ "TN attorney general, panelists discuss social media's impact on kids". The Jackson Sun. 2023-04-11. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  115. ^ Lewis, Matthew (2022-10-10). "The Role of the Attorney General in Reforming Social Media for Children". New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy Quorum.
  116. ^ Abi-Jaoude MSc MD, Elia; Naylor MPH MD, Karline Treurnicht; Pignatiello MD, Antonio (2020-02-10). "Smartphones, social media use and youth mental health" (PDF). CMAJ. 192 (6): E136-141. doi:10.1503/cmaj.190434. PMC 7012622. PMID 32041697.
  117. ^ Meier, Evelyn P.; Gray, James (2013). "Facebook PhotoActivity associated with Body Image Disturbance in Adolescent Girls" (PDF). Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 17 (4): 199–206. doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0305. PMID 24237288. S2CID 10178753.
  118. ^ "Motion for an Order Compelling TikTok, Inc. to comply with the Attorney General's Request for Information Case # 23-0298-IV". 2023-03-06. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  119. ^ Witley, Skye; Brown, Christopher (2023-03-06). "TikTok Faces Two-Party Push to Yield Data in Kids Harm Probe (1)". Bloomberg Law. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  120. ^ "Tennessee General Assembly Senate Bill 0834". wapp.capitol.tn.gov. Retrieved 2023-08-07.
  121. ^ "Tennessee Public Chapter 152" (PDF). State of Tennessee | Secretary of State. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  122. ^ "Tennessee law prohibits use of TikTok on campus internet". The Daily Beacon. 2023-04-14. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  123. ^ Guzmán, María Marta (2023-04-14). "Gov. Lee signs bill that bans TikTok from college campuses". WBIR-TV. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  124. ^ Cornwell, Sarah (2023-04-20). "Tennessee law bans TikTok on college campuses". The Pacer. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  125. ^ Thomas, Keenan (2023-04-14). "University of Tennessee cuts off access to TikTok on Wi-Fi to comply with new law". Knox News. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  126. ^ "Tennessee AG co-leading coalition targeting large businesses after Supreme Court affirmative action decision". wbir.com. 2023-07-13. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  127. ^ a b Skrmetti, Jonathan (2023-07-13). "SFFA Letter to Fortune 100 CEOs" (PDF). TN.gov. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  128. ^ Roberts, Jr., John (2023-06-29). "20-1199 Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v President and Fellows of Harvard College (06-29-2023)" (PDF). supremecourt.gov. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  129. ^ Totenberg, Nina (2023-06-29). "Supreme Court guts affirmative action, effectively ending race-conscious admissions". NPR. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  130. ^ Grantham-Philips, Wyatte; Mulvihill, Geoff (2023-07-15). "Fortune 100 companies are getting swarmed by Republican AGs using the Supreme Court affirmative action as a lever into the workplace". Fortune. Associated Press. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  131. ^ Sapsford, Jathon (2023-07-14). "Republican Attorneys General Warn Top U.S. Businesses Over 'Discrimination'". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2023-07-29.
  132. ^ a b Stockard, Sam (2023-07-18). "Litigation likely to follow AG's foray into business world's race-based policies". Tennessee Lookout. Retrieved 2023-07-29.
  133. ^ Thompson, Jacquelyn L.; King, G. Roger; Bartl, Timothy J.; Hoff, Gregory (2022-08-05). "BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE HR POLICY ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS" (PDF). hrpolicy.org. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  134. ^ Hoff, Gregory (2022-08-05). "HR Policy Files Amicus Brief in Harvard and UNC Supreme Court College Admissions Cases". hrpolicy.org. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  135. ^ Beck, Amanda H. (2023-06-29). "Large Employers Reaffirm Commitment to D&I Practices in Reaction to Harvard/UNC SCOTUS Decision | HR Policy". hrpolicy.org. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  136. ^ blackstar (2023-07-14). "Sharpton To Corporate America: Expect Blacklash For Backing Out Of DEI Pledges". Black Star News. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  137. ^ danieljohnson (2023-07-15). "Republicans Draw Party Lines Around DEI Initiatives". Black Enterprise. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  138. ^ McKay, Serenah (2023-07-15). "Attorneys general ask Fortune 100 CEOs to keep racial preferences out of their hiring and promotion policies". Northwest Arkansas Democrat Gazette. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  139. ^ Stockard, Sam; Wadhwani, Anita (2023-07-13). "Attorney general threatens Fortune 100 companies order with legal action for race-based policies". Tennessee Lookout. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  140. ^ "Republican Attorneys General cite hiring bias concerns in letter to Fortune 100 CEOs". www2.staffingindustry.com. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  141. ^ Spitalniak, Laura (2023-07-14). "GOP leaders warn companies against race-conscious practices in light of Supreme Court ruling". Higher Ed Dive. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  142. ^ "Letter to Fortune 100 Companies from Aaron D. Ford, AG Nevada, et. al" (PDF). 2023-07-19. Retrieved 2023-07-26.
  143. ^ Haas, Greg (2023-07-25). "Ford joins in letter supporting workplace diversity, against intimidation of top employers". 8 News Now, LasVegas. Retrieved 2023-07-26.
  144. ^ Thadani, Trisha; Bogage, Jacob (2023-07-19). "The campaign against affirmative action shifts to corporate America". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2023-07-26.
  145. ^ Wegner, Rachel (2023-02-21). "State investigates Nashville DA over security camera audio recordings | Funk says no recording was improper, cites security concerns". The Tennessean. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  146. ^ Schelzig, Erik (2023-02-21). "Nashville DA says recording system akin to residential Ring cameras". The Tennessee Journal. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  147. ^ Kittle, M.D. (2023-02-22). "Report: Tennessee AG Launches Criminal Probe into Nashville DA's Office on Wiretapping Concerns". The Tennessee Star. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  148. ^ Williams, Phil (2023-02-09). "Listening devices installed around Nashville DA's office, vendor confirms; DA defends practice | Experts say practice raises questions about whether the DA's Office is violating law it is sworn to enforce". News Channel 5 Nashville. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  149. ^ Housler, Kaitlin (2023-03-25). "Special Agents with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Seen at Nashville District Attorney Offices amid Criminal Probe". The Tennessee Star. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  150. ^ Williams, Phil (2023-05-02). "Search of Nashville DA's offices was based on warrant - not 'invitation,' as DA Glenn Funk suggested". News Channel 5 Nashville. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  151. ^ Mojica, Adrian (2023-03-27). "Nashville District Attorney says allegations of security violations 'baseless'". Fox 17 Nashville. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  152. ^ a b Williams, Phil (2023-07-19). "Criminal investigation of Nashville DA Glenn Funk's office continues, state attorneys tell judge". News Channel 5 Nashville. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  153. ^ D'Abrosca, Peter (2023-05-04). "Nashville DA Files Motion to Unseal Records Related to Probe into His Office". The Tennessee Star. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  154. ^ Shelzig, Erik (2023-05-03). "Nashville prosecutor wants search warrant unsealed, alleges conflict of interest in AG's office". The Tennessee Journal. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  155. ^ Lucas, Fred (2023-06-22). "Tennessee AG Jonathan Skrmetti Exits Attorneys General Alliance". Heartland Daily News. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  156. ^ "Attorney General Alliance | Our Members". Attorney General Alliance. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
  157. ^ "Twitter announcement: TN AG Skrmetti recognized as Defender of Freedom". Twitter. 2023-05-03. Retrieved 2023-08-08.
  158. ^ Housler, Kaitlin (2023-05-05). "Tennessee Faith and Freedom Coalition Presents Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti with Defender of Freedom Award". Tennessee Star. Retrieved 2023-08-08.
  159. ^ "Tennessee Faith & Freedom Coalition | About Us". Tennessee Faith & Freedom Coalition. Retrieved 2023-08-08.
  160. ^ "Jason Foundation Inc. | About Us". The Jason Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 2023-08-08.
  161. ^ "The Jason Foundation, Inc. Elects Two New Board Members". www.prnewswire.com. 2023-06-20. Retrieved 2023-08-08.
[edit]

Federalist Society membership page: [1]

Tennessee Bar Association page: [2]

TN Attorney General's YouTube: [3]

Legal offices
Preceded by Attorney General of Tennessee
2022–present 		Incumbent
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jonathan_Skrmetti&oldid=1256080879"