United States v. Skrmetti
| United States v. Skrmetti | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Full case name | United States of America v. Jonathan Thomas Skrmetti, et al |
| Docket no. | 23-477 |
| Case history | |
| Prior |
|
| Questions presented | |
| Whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1 (SB1), which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow "a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor's sex" or to treat "purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor's sex and asserted identity," Tenn. Code Ann. § 68-33-103(a)(1), violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
United States v. Skrmetti (Docket No. 23-477) is a pending United States Supreme Court case on whether bans on gender affirming care (including puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and gender reassignment surgery) for children violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[1]
Background
[edit]On March 22, 2023, the Tennessee House of Representatives passed HB1 amending the Tennessee Code prohibiting certain forms of gender affirming care for transgender minors with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria.[2] This includes puberty blockers and hormone therapy.[3]
Upon passage of the law, the Department of Justice sought an injunction in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee to prevent the law from going into effect on July 1, 2023.[3]
The District Court granted a preliminary injunction, preventing the ban on hormones and puberty blockers from going into effect. The court deemed the state ban as infringing on the "fundamental rights" of parents, while allowing for the ban on gender affirming surgery to remain.[4]
Sixth Circuit
[edit]The District Court's ruling was further appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. In a 2–1 decision, the Sixth Circuit stayed the lower court's decision to grant a preliminary injunction. Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton wrote that the Tennessee state government was likely to succeed upon their appeal and that the right of parents to control the medical care of their children is not a fundamental right because it is not "deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition," a standard set by the Supreme Court in Washington v. Glucksberg (1997).[5]
Judge Helene White concurred in part and dissented in part, arguing that the Tennessee law is "likely unconstitutional based on the Plaintiffs’ theory of sex discrimination" and that she would not stay the injunction but rather narrow its scope. However, she agreed that the "District Court abused its discretion in granting a statewide preliminary injunction."[5]
Supreme Court
[edit]On November 6, 2023, the United States petitioned the Supreme Court to hear this case on appeal.[6] The Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 24, 2024.[7] Oral arguments will be heard on December 4, 2024.[8]
References
[edit]- ^ Howe, Amy (June 24, 2024). "Supreme Court takes up challenge to ban on gender-affirming care". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
- ^ "Tennessee SB0001 | 2023-2024 | 113th General Assembly". LegiScan. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
- ^ a b "Justice Department Challenges Tennessee Law that Bans Critical, Medically Necessary Care for Transgender Youth" (Press release). United States Department of Justice. April 26, 2023. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
- ^ L. W. v. Skrmetti, 3:23-cv-00376 (M.D. Tenn. June 28, 2023).
- ^ a b "L. W. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-5600 (6th Cir. 2023)". Justia Law. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
- ^ "Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the case United States v. Skrmetti" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. November 2023.
- ^ Sherman, Mark (June 24, 2024). "Supreme Court will take up state bans on gender-affirming care for minors". AP News. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
- ^ Howe, Amy (October 18, 2024). "Supreme Court schedules transgender rights case for December". SCOTUSblog.
