Draft:Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati
| Submission declined on 18 August 2024 by Urban Versis 32 (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 16 August 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by DoubleGrazing 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 1 August 2024 by Dan arndt (talk). This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one. Declined by Dan arndt 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 31 July 2024 by Aviram7 (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Aviram7 3 months ago. | |
Comment: The whole 'Contributions to Sanatan' section makes no sense, there is no actual content in it, only headings and links. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: We require inline citations throughout in articles on living people, so that it's clear where each piece of information comes from, and how much of this remains unreferenced. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: For background, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati and the original article moved to draft as the outcome of that discussion, at Draft:Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati. Wikishovel (talk) 10:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
{{db-userreq}}