Draft:Mozo (website)
Submission declined on 1 August 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 23 July 2024 by Pichemist (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Pichemist 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 10 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by SafariScribe 4 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 10 July 2024 by Ae245 (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Ae245 4 months ago. | |
Comment: Zero evidence of notability. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Type of site | Comparison Website |
|---|---|
| Available in | English |
| Owner | Future plc |
| URL | www |
| Commercial | Yes |
| Launched | 2008 |
| Current status | Active |
Mozo.com.au is an Australian financial comparison website.[1] based in Sydney, Australia that compares various personal financial products in the retail banking sector, including home loans/mortgages, personal loans, credit cards, insurance, savings accounts, term deposits and bank accounts.
History
[edit]Founded in October 2008 by Rohan Gamble[2] who has featured on the BOSS Young Executives List[3], Mozo provides tools for comparing financial products. Prior to Mozo, Gamble was the founding CEO of Virgin Money Australia, where he launched financial products like the low rate, no annual fee Virgin Credit Card and Virgin Super. Gamble left Virgin in 2006[4]
In 2021, Mozo was acquired by Future PLC[5], a FTSE-250 global media company that owns brands including GoCompare Country Life, PC Gamer, and TechRadar.
References
[edit]- ^ "ACCC Retail deposits inquiry: Final report" (PDF). ACCC Retail Deposits Inquiry: 124. December 2023.
- ^ Jones, Kate (April 22, 2013). "Who wants to be a millionaire?". The Sydney Morning Herald.
- ^ Tattersall, Hannah (11 July 2018). "BOSS Young Executives: how the originals have flourished". Australian Financial Review. Retrieved 25 July 2024.
- ^ "Virgin loses Gamble with third product". Australian Financial Review. 2006-02-27. Retrieved 2024-07-25.
- ^ "Another record breaking year for Future - Future plc". futureplc.com. Retrieved 2024-07-25.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.