Draft:High School of Charleston
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,042 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission rejected on 9 November 2023 by Qcne (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Qcne 12 months ago. Last edited by CNMall41 3 days ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 7 May 2022 by Dege31 (talk).Dege31 2 years ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 8 August 2021 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 3 years ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 24 July 2021 by Tamingimpala (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Tamingimpala 3 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 9 July 2021 by Qwerfjkl (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Qwerfjkl 3 years ago.
| |
Comment: Sorry, not convinced by the arguments that this is notable. The sources certainly don't show notability under WP:NSCHOOL. Qcne (talk) 19:25, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Why is any school notable then? Geraldine Aino (talk) 18:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't see anything suggesting notability per WP:GNG. Being housed in an historic building or associated with important people does not make any organisation notable. Please point specifically to the policy, and the supporting evidence, that makes this notable. DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:40, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: not clear why this school is notable? Theroadislong (talk) 10:48, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Founded in 1839. Extant historic building. The legislature deemed it important and funded it. Notable alumni. Mayor discussed its importance to the city in 1881. City Mayor and alderman served on its board. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Clearly notable. Historic. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:08, 7 October 2023 (UTC) High School of Charleston and Charleston High School should link here
The High School of Charleston, also known as Charleston High School, was in Charleston, South Carolina. It was founded in 1839 to serve young men[1] and opened in 1841.[2] The Greek Revival Architecture building was designed by Edward Brickell White.[2] The neighborhood declined after the American Civil War and the school was relocated to George Street in 1881.[2] The school closed in 1982, reopened as a Middle School, and closed again in 1985.[3] It was sold and has been converted to apartments.
The school was deemed essential to Charleston and a board of supervisors was established including the mayor of Charleston, an alderman, and board members of the College of Charleston. Public funds were devoted to support it and access granted to select children from Charleston's orphanage.[4]
Charleston mayor William A. Courtenay made a statement about the importance and potential of the school ca. 1881 and referenced Exeter in New Hampshire.[5]
In 1925 the school was merged into Charleston's public school system.[1] The original building was renovated in 1985 and now holds condos.[2][6][7]
Robert Venning Royall (1854 - 1935) taught at the school and became principal. He went on to be mayor of Mount Pleasant, South Carolina.[8]
Alumni
[edit]- George L. von Kolnitz, judge and state legislator[9]
- James Cosgrove (South Carolina), state legislator
- Cynthia Hurd, librarian
References
[edit]- ^ a b "Records: City Board of Public School Commissioners, 1812–1935". Charleston County Public Library.
- ^ a b c d "Old Charleston HIgh School | Charleston Walking Tours by Michael Trouche". 21 May 2014.
- ^ "MUSC Breaks Ground for New College Building". depthtml.musc.edu.
- ^ "Year Book - Charleston, S. C." News and Cowier Book Presses. July 9, 1910 – via Google Books.
- ^ "Year Book ... City of Charleston, So. Ca". News and Courier Book Presses. February 16, 1881 – via Google Books.
- ^ "Property File - 55 Society Street (High School of Charleston) | Historic Charleston Foundation". charleston.pastperfectonline.com.
- ^ "Old Charleston HIgh School | Charleston Walking Tours by Michael TroucheCharleston Walking Tours by Michael Trouche". 21 May 2014.
- ^ "Influential Icons of East Cooper". Mount Pleasant Magazine. July 3, 2014.
- ^ "Influential Icons of East Cooper - Mount Pleasant Magazine". 3 July 2014.
- This draft is in progress as of October 10, 2023.
- Pending AfC submissions
- AfC pending submissions by age/4 days ago
- AfC submissions by date/11 November 2024
- AfC submissions by date/09 November 2023
- AfC submissions by date/08 January 2022
- AfC submissions by date/07 August 2021
- AfC submissions by date/09 July 2021
- AfC submissions by date/16 February 2021
- AfC submissions on geography, places and buildings
- Draft articles on North America
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.