This category is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Templates, a group dedicated to improving the maintenance of Wikipedia's templates. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TemplatesWikipedia:WikiProject TemplatesTemplate:WikiProject TemplatesTemplates articles
I propose that the templates regarding who has received the Nobel prize are changed not to include the word "winners". Working on the articles related to this year's recipients and ITN I have come across varieties of this way of speaking about the prize. You never "win" a Nobel Prize, it is awarded to you for an achievement. (Would anyone ever say that someone "won" a Purple Heart?) It's not an international lottery. Having templates called "Nobel Prize winners" only ads to the confusion. Pinging @PrimeHunter: since they seems to be working with this. w.carter-Talk08:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I created many of the templates but just copied the name from existing templates for other years. The template names are not shown in mainspace so the precise name is not very important. Google finds many sources saying winners, e.g. Nature, National Geographic, CNN, and Google itself in the search Nobel Prize winners with Google-made features I haven't seen before. Another word from the beginning (maybe laureates instead of recipients) might have been better but I don't think it's worth changing now. Note that for my admin account, "Page information" in the left pane shows this page only has 4 watchers (others may only see "Fewer than 30"), and [1] says 7 views of this talk page in the last 30 days. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:52, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@PrimeHunter: Thanks for answering, I know this page doesn't get much traffic, which is why I pinged you just to start somewhere (otherwise, where else?). I also know that the "winning" is a very widespread (albeit wrong) terminology and not visible in the articles, but editors see it just the same when editing. And since I think I'm becoming a bit Giraffedata ;) about this "win vs award", this was a good place to start with the weeding. Cheers, w.carter-Talk11:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
