1932 United States presidential election in Alabama
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 11 Alabama votes to the Electoral College | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County results
Roosevelt 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% 90–100%
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.jpg)
| Elections in Alabama |
|---|
 |
 Government |
The 1932 United States presidential election in Alabama took place on November 8, 1932, as part of the nationwide presidential election. Alabama voters chose eleven representatives,[2] or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president. In Alabama, voters voted for electors individually instead of as a slate, as in the other states.
Since the 1890s, Alabama had been effectively a one-party state ruled by the Democratic Party. Disenfranchisement of almost all African-Americans and a large proportion of poor whites via poll taxes, literacy tests[3] and informal harassment had essentially eliminated opposition parties outside of Unionist Winston County and a few nearby northern hill counties that had been Populist strongholds.[4] The only competitive statewide elections became Democratic Party primaries that were limited by law to white voters. Unlike most other Confederate states, however, soon after black disenfranchisement Alabama’s remaining white Republicans made rapid efforts to expel blacks from the state Republican Party.[5] Indeed under Oscar D. Street, who ironically was appointed state party boss as part of the pro-Taft “black and tan” faction in 1912,[6] the state GOP would permanently turn “lily-white”, with the last black delegates from the state at any Republican National Convention serving in 1920.[5]
The 1920 election, aided by isolationism in Appalachia[7] and the whitening of the state GOP,[8] saw the Republicans gain their best presidential vote share in Alabama since 1884,[9] while the GOP even exceed forty percent in the House of Representatives races for the 4th, 7th and 10th congressional districts.[7] However, isolationist sentiment in Appalachia would ease after the election of Warren G. Harding[7] while funding issues meant the Republicans would not emulate their efforts in the rest of the decade.[10]
Then in 1928, a virtual “civil war” broke out in the state Democratic Party over the nomination of Al Smith,[11] as the hegemonic Democratic Party was placed in a quandary over the nomination of an urban, Catholic, racial liberal. The loyalists centred in the Black Belt supported Smith and the traditional Democratic Party as the best route to maintaining absolute white supremacy through encouraging capital investment, whereas the “Hoovercrats” led by former leaders of the Ku Klux Klan backed Republican Herbert Hoover and were intensely focused on nativism, Prohibition and Protestant fundamentalism.
After Smith narrowly carried the state, Hoovercrat leader James Thomas Heflin would not be renominated for the Senate in 1930, while the economic catastrophe of the Great Depression meant that this trend towards the GOP would be short-lived.[12] The Depression had extremely severe effects in the South, which had the highest unemployment rate in the nation, and many Southerners blamed this on the North and on Wall Street, rejecting Hoover’s claim that the Depression’s causes were exogenous.[13] No campaigning was done in the state, and polls showed always that Democratic nominees Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt and Speaker John Nance Garner would re-establish the large margins by which the state had been won before 1928. An early October poll showed Roosevelt leading incumbent President Herbert Hoover and Vice President Charles Curtis by a nine-to-two majority.[14] This poll underestimated the return of the Hoovercrats to the party, for Roosevelt won 84.74 percent of the vote to a mere 14.13 percent for Hoover.[15][16] This remains the only time in history that any presidential candidate has won every single county in Alabama,[17] due to Roosevelt carrying Southern Unionist and reliably Republican Winston County by just a single vote.
Results
[edit]Results by county
[edit]| County | Franklin Delano Roosevelt Democratic |
Herbert Clark Hoover Republican |
Norman Mattoon Thomas Socialist |
William Zebulon Foster Communist |
William David Upshaw Prohibition |
Margin | Total votes cast | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Autauga | 1,322 | 89.81% | 138 | 9.38% | 11 | 0.75% | 1 | 0.07% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,184 | 80.43% | 1,472 |
| Baldwin | 2,097 | 75.43% | 544 | 19.57% | 131 | 4.71% | 8 | 0.29% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,553 | 55.86% | 2,780 |
| Barbour | 2,207 | 96.88% | 64 | 2.81% | 6 | 0.26% | 1 | 0.04% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,143 | 94.07% | 2,278 |
| Bibb | 1,636 | 90.29% | 145 | 8.00% | 31 | 1.71% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,491 | 82.28% | 1,812 |
| Blount | 2,232 | 77.99% | 582 | 20.34% | 43 | 1.50% | 5 | 0.17% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,650 | 57.65% | 2,862 |
| Bullock | 1,004 | 98.72% | 12 | 1.18% | 1 | 0.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 992 | 97.54% | 1,017 |
| Butler | 2,280 | 96.45% | 74 | 3.13% | 9 | 0.38% | 1 | 0.04% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,206 | 93.32% | 2,364 |
| Calhoun | 4,392 | 85.98% | 685 | 13.41% | 28 | 0.55% | 3 | 0.06% | 0 | 0.00% | 3,707 | 72.57% | 5,108 |
| Chambers | 2,552 | 87.85% | 342 | 11.77% | 7 | 0.24% | 4 | 0.14% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,210 | 76.08% | 2,905 |
| Cherokee | 1,897 | 83.09% | 359 | 15.72% | 23 | 1.01% | 4 | 0.18% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,538 | 67.37% | 2,283 |
| Chilton | 1,664 | 51.17% | 1,533 | 47.14% | 53 | 1.63% | 2 | 0.06% | 0 | 0.00% | 131 | 4.03% | 3,252 |
| Choctaw | 1,533 | 96.90% | 48 | 3.03% | 1 | 0.06% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,485 | 93.87% | 1,582 |
| Clarke | 2,408 | 97.69% | 53 | 2.15% | 3 | 0.12% | 1 | 0.04% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,355 | 95.54% | 2,465 |
| Clay | 2,104 | 68.78% | 933 | 30.50% | 13 | 0.42% | 9 | 0.29% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,171 | 38.28% | 3,059 |
| Cleburne | 1,403 | 77.43% | 405 | 22.35% | 2 | 0.11% | 2 | 0.11% | 0 | 0.00% | 998 | 55.08% | 1,812 |
| Coffee | 2,868 | 96.73% | 95 | 3.20% | 1 | 0.03% | 1 | 0.03% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,773 | 93.52% | 2,965 |
| Colbert | 2,908 | 89.64% | 312 | 9.62% | 24 | 0.74% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,596 | 80.02% | 3,244 |
| Conecuh | 2,125 | 94.91% | 114 | 5.09% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,011 | 89.82% | 2,239 |
| Coosa | 1,265 | 82.63% | 250 | 16.33% | 15 | 0.98% | 1 | 0.07% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,015 | 66.30% | 1,531 |
| Covington | 3,855 | 97.15% | 99 | 2.49% | 10 | 0.25% | 4 | 0.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 3,756 | 94.66% | 3,968 |
| Crenshaw | 2,248 | 93.20% | 127 | 5.27% | 3 | 0.12% | 30 | 1.24% | 4 | 0.17% | 2,121 | 87.94% | 2,412 |
| Cullman | 2,910 | 73.78% | 956 | 24.24% | 71 | 1.80% | 7 | 0.18% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,954 | 49.54% | 3,944 |
| Dale | 2,300 | 93.65% | 155 | 6.31% | 1 | 0.04% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,145 | 87.34% | 2,456 |
| Dallas | 3,027 | 96.62% | 93 | 2.97% | 12 | 0.38% | 1 | 0.03% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,934 | 93.65% | 3,133 |
| DeKalb | 4,217 | 54.13% | 3,496 | 44.88% | 73 | 0.94% | 4 | 0.05% | 0 | 0.00% | 721 | 9.26% | 7,790 |
| Elmore | 3,197 | 87.88% | 159 | 4.37% | 7 | 0.19% | 275 | 7.56% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,922[a] | 80.32% | 3,638 |
| Escambia | 2,024 | 92.67% | 157 | 7.19% | 3 | 0.14% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,867 | 85.49% | 2,184 |
| Etowah | 5,167 | 82.08% | 1,066 | 16.93% | 62 | 0.98% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 4,101 | 65.15% | 6,295 |
| Fayette | 2,013 | 72.70% | 733 | 26.47% | 19 | 0.69% | 4 | 0.14% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,280 | 46.23% | 2,769 |
| Franklin | 2,876 | 64.53% | 1,547 | 34.71% | 34 | 0.76% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,329 | 29.82% | 4,457 |
| Geneva | 2,559 | 90.33% | 270 | 9.53% | 1 | 0.04% | 3 | 0.11% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,289 | 80.80% | 2,833 |
| Greene | 665 | 95.82% | 9 | 1.30% | 20 | 2.88% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 645[b] | 92.94% | 694 |
| Hale | 1,276 | 94.59% | 70 | 5.19% | 1 | 0.07% | 2 | 0.15% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,206 | 89.40% | 1,349 |
| Henry | 1,741 | 97.43% | 42 | 2.35% | 4 | 0.22% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,699 | 95.08% | 1,787 |
| Houston | 3,863 | 95.83% | 157 | 3.89% | 7 | 0.17% | 2 | 0.05% | 2 | 0.05% | 3,706 | 91.94% | 4,031 |
| Jackson | 3,112 | 76.69% | 938 | 23.11% | 8 | 0.20% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,174 | 53.57% | 4,058 |
| Jefferson | 30,858 | 85.15% | 4,567 | 12.60% | 779 | 2.15% | 34 | 0.09% | 1 | 0.00% | 26,291 | 72.55% | 36,239 |
| Lamar | 2,207 | 89.24% | 258 | 10.43% | 4 | 0.16% | 4 | 0.16% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,949 | 78.81% | 2,473 |
| Lauderdale | 3,336 | 88.09% | 431 | 11.38% | 19 | 0.50% | 1 | 0.03% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,905 | 76.71% | 3,787 |
| Lawrence | 1,920 | 86.53% | 299 | 13.47% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,621 | 73.05% | 2,219 |
| Lee | 1,988 | 94.53% | 103 | 4.90% | 11 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.05% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,885 | 89.63% | 2,103 |
| Limestone | 2,667 | 95.94% | 107 | 3.85% | 5 | 0.18% | 1 | 0.04% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,560 | 92.09% | 2,780 |
| Lowndes | 1,073 | 98.35% | 18 | 1.65% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,055 | 96.70% | 1,091 |
| Macon | 905 | 94.07% | 56 | 5.82% | 1 | 0.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 849 | 88.25% | 962 |
| Madison | 4,795 | 88.76% | 559 | 10.35% | 45 | 0.83% | 3 | 0.06% | 0 | 0.00% | 4,236 | 78.42% | 5,402 |
| Marengo | 2,097 | 95.45% | 50 | 2.28% | 50 | 2.28% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,047 | 93.17% | 2,197 |
| Marion | 2,325 | 80.73% | 545 | 18.92% | 5 | 0.17% | 1 | 0.03% | 4 | 0.14% | 1,780 | 61.81% | 2,880 |
| Marshall | 3,921 | 79.45% | 904 | 18.32% | 65 | 1.32% | 45 | 0.91% | 0 | 0.00% | 3,017 | 61.13% | 4,935 |
| Mobile | 9,658 | 84.37% | 1,710 | 14.94% | 61 | 0.53% | 18 | 0.16% | 0 | 0.00% | 7,948 | 69.43% | 11,447 |
| Monroe | 1,972 | 96.52% | 66 | 3.23% | 3 | 0.15% | 2 | 0.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,906 | 93.29% | 2,043 |
| Montgomery | 10,066 | 95.57% | 441 | 4.19% | 18 | 0.17% | 8 | 0.08% | 0 | 0.00% | 9,625 | 91.38% | 10,533 |
| Morgan | 4,896 | 86.62% | 656 | 11.61% | 31 | 0.55% | 69 | 1.22% | 0 | 0.00% | 4,240 | 75.02% | 5,652 |
| Perry | 1,382 | 95.05% | 37 | 2.54% | 2 | 0.14% | 33 | 2.27% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,345 | 92.50% | 1,454 |
| Pickens | 1,479 | 87.10% | 128 | 7.54% | 9 | 0.53% | 82 | 4.83% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,351 | 79.56% | 1,698 |
| Pike | 2,545 | 97.92% | 52 | 2.00% | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 0.04% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,493 | 95.92% | 2,599 |
| Randolph | 2,227 | 74.09% | 767 | 25.52% | 10 | 0.33% | 2 | 0.07% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,460 | 48.57% | 3,006 |
| Russell | 1,894 | 97.28% | 46 | 2.36% | 5 | 0.26% | 2 | 0.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,848 | 94.92% | 1,947 |
| Shelby | 2,365 | 72.48% | 864 | 26.48% | 33 | 1.01% | 1 | 0.03% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,501 | 46.00% | 3,263 |
| St. Clair | 2,185 | 59.46% | 1,449 | 39.43% | 38 | 1.03% | 3 | 0.08% | 0 | 0.00% | 736 | 20.03% | 3,675 |
| Sumter | 1,293 | 98.03% | 26 | 1.97% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,267 | 96.06% | 1,319 |
| Talladega | 3,353 | 84.33% | 617 | 15.52% | 4 | 0.10% | 2 | 0.05% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,736 | 68.81% | 3,976 |
| Tallapoosa | 3,391 | 95.87% | 138 | 3.90% | 6 | 0.17% | 2 | 0.06% | 0 | 0.00% | 3,253 | 91.97% | 3,537 |
| Tuscaloosa | 5,322 | 94.08% | 302 | 5.34% | 28 | 0.49% | 4 | 0.07% | 1 | 0.02% | 5,020 | 88.74% | 5,657 |
| Walker | 4,734 | 74.31% | 1,583 | 24.85% | 44 | 0.69% | 10 | 0.16% | 0 | 0.00% | 3,151 | 49.46% | 6,371 |
| Washington | 1,307 | 94.10% | 81 | 5.83% | 1 | 0.07% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,226 | 88.26% | 1,389 |
| Wilcox | 1,358 | 98.33% | 23 | 1.67% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,335 | 96.67% | 1,381 |
| Winston | 1,006 | 49.83% | 1,005 | 49.78% | 7 | 0.35% | 1 | 0.05% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.05% | 2,019 |
| Totals | 207,910 | 84.76% | 34,675 | 14.14% | 2,030 | 0.83% | 675 | 0.28% | 13 | 0.01% | 173,235 | 70.62% | 245,303 |
Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic
[edit]- Baldwin
- Blount
- Calhoun
- Chambers
- Cherokee
- Chilton
- Choctaw
- Clay
- Cleburne
- Conecuh
- Coosa
- Cullman
- DeKalb
- Elmore
- Escambia
- Etowah
- Fayette
- Franklin
- Geneva
- Jackson
- Jefferson
- Madison
- Marshall
- Morgan
- Randolph
- St. Clair
- Shelby
- Winston
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ In this county where Foster ran second ahead of Hoover, margin given is Roosevelt vote minus Foster vote and percentage margin Roosevelt percentage minus Foster percentage.
- ^ In this county where Thomas ran second ahead of Hoover, margin given is Roosevelt vote minus Thomas vote and percentage margin Roosevelt percentage minus Thomas percentage.
References
[edit]- ^ "United States Presidential election of 1932 — Encyclopædia Britannica". Retrieved January 16, 2019.
- ^ "1932 Election for the Thirty-seventh Term (1933-37)". Retrieved January 16, 2019.
- ^ Perman, Michael (2001). Struggle for Mastery: Disfranchisement in the South, 1888–1908. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. p. Introduction. ISBN 9780807849095.
- ^ Webb, Samuel L. "From Independents to Populists to Progressive Republicans: The Case of Chilton County, Alabama, 1880-1920". The Journal of Southern History. 59 (4): 707–736. doi:10.2307/2210539. JSTOR 2210539.
- ^ a b Heersink, Boris; Jenkins, Jeffery A. (2020). Republican Party Politics and the American South, 1865-1968. Cambridge University Press. pp. 251–253. ISBN 9781107158436.
- ^ Casdorph, Paul D. (1981). Republicans, Negroes, and Progressives in the South, 1912-1916. The University of Alabama Press. pp. 70, 94–95. ISBN 0817300481.
- ^ a b c Phillips, Kevin P. (1969). The Emerging Republican Majority. Arlington House. p. 255. ISBN 0870000586.
- ^ Heersink and Jenkins, Republican Party Politics and the American South, p. 19
- ^ Leip, Dave. "Presidential General Election Results Comparison — Alabama". Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.
- ^ See "G.O.P. Funds Are Reported Short: Forces "Counted On" Disappoint Republican Political Managers". The Birmingham News. Birmingham, Alabama. August 19, 1922. p. 5.
- ^ Feldman, Glenn (September 13, 2004). "Epilogue. Ugly Roots: Race, Emotion and the Rise of the Modern Republican Party in Alabama and the South". In Feldman, Glenn (ed.). Before Brown: Civil Rights and White Backlash in the Modern South. University of Alabama Press. pp. 270–273. ISBN 9780817351342.
- ^ Lewinson, Paul (1965). Race, class and party; a history of Negro suffrage and white politics in the South. pp. 167–168.
- ^ Ritchie, Donald A. (2007). Electing FDR: the New Deal campaign of 1932. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. p. 143. ISBN 978-0700616879.
- ^ "Roosevelt Takes Bigger Lead in Digest Ballot: Has Total to date of 404,992 to 325,845 for Hoover with twenty States Represented". Kennebec Journal. Augusta, Maine. October 7, 1932. p. 3.
- ^ "1932 Presidential General Election Results — Alabama". Retrieved January 16, 2019.
- ^ "The American Presidency Project — Election of 1932". Retrieved January 16, 2019.
- ^ Thomas, G. Scott (1987). The pursuit of the White House: a handbook of presidential election statistics and history. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 390, 418. ISBN 0313257957.
- ^ Alabama Official and Statistical Register, 1935. Wetumpka, Alabama: Wetumpka Printing Company. 1935. pp. 501–511.
- ^ "AL US President Race, November 08, 1932". Our Campaigns.
