Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-05-31/Featured content

The part about the Featured Topic that was promoted is lackluster and doesn't even accurately mention who nominated the topic. GamerPro64 23:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

• GamerPro64 The error in nominator listing is due to the script misidentifying it (exactly why I don't know). The lack of description was due to the fact that it was added literally as publication was occurring (or just about). Not an excuse, just a reason. I have amended accordingly. My sincerest apologies to all involved. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

• That is better. But I have always think that Featured Topics gets the short end of the stick when it comes to coverage at the Signpsot. Yes its not as popular as the other three Featured Content and less Featured Topics are promoted monthly but I do find it disappointing at times. GamerPro64 23:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

• Just noting again that I'm really pleased to see featured content back in the Signpost, and to see such stellar content to fill it. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
• @Eddie891: Is there a reason, why users are not piped in the featured pictures section? Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:14, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

• Armbrust: Nope, just an oversight on my part. I'm still figuring out the best way to handle each section. I'll pipe them shortly and make a mental note that piping is something the script doesn't do on its own. Thanks for bringing it up, I hadn't noticed that. Apologies, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
• Armbrust: should be fixed. Thanks again for bringing it up. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:57, 6 June 2020 (UTC)