Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History/Archive 11
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's History. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | → | Archive 15 |
Disambiguation links on pages tagged by this wikiproject
Wikipedia has many thousands of wikilinks which point to disambiguation pages. It would be useful to readers if these links directed them to the specific pages of interest, rather than making them search through a list. Members of WikiProject Disambiguation have been working on this and the total number is now below 20,000 for the first time. Some of these links require specialist knowledge of the topics concerned and therefore it would be great if you could help in your area of expertise.
A list of the relevant links on pages which fall within the remit of this wikiproject can be found at http://69.142.160.183/~dispenser/cgi-bin/topic_points.py?banner=WikiProject_Women%27s_History
Please take a few minutes to help make these more useful to our readers.— Rod talk 20:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Josephine Butler
You are invited to comment at Talk:Josephine Butler#Request for comment on names where there's an issue about naming; the article (which is currently a FA) refers to its female subject by her first name throughout "for simplicity". Any input is welcome.--John (talk) 18:26, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
BBC 100 Women
I've started a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Notability_(people)#BBC_100_Women on whether the women listed on this program are inherently notable. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
New Year's resolution: Write more articles for Women in Red!
 .jpg) .jpg) 
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Revisiting gendered categories
Wikipedia talk:Categorization#Revisiting gendered categories: Let's have a clear criterion of "has or can have a proper article" --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- It is not a !voting proposal or RfC, but a discussion draft, and has already had some constructive feedback (e.g. leading with "ghettoization" of articles was a distraction, as were suggesting statistical differences and reasons for them without providing sources). Seeking input on the overall idea. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 02:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Can this image be added to the Gloria Richardson article? Bus stop (talk) 00:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Merge proposal
It has been proposed that Timeline of feminism be merged into Timeline of second-wave feminism. Seeking your feedback at Talk:Timeline of feminism#Merge discussion. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 11:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
"Carolina Oliphant, Lady Nairne", by any other name
I've started a Request for Comment on Talk:Carolina Nairne#Request for comment on how to refer to the article subject: How should the article refer to its subject, Carolina Oliphant, Lady Nairne, after the initial mention of her full name? --GRuban (talk) 18:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Feburary 2018 at Women in Red
.jpg)   New:
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Sarah Jane Brown move discussion
In case anyone is interested, Talk:Sarah Jane Brown#Requested move 8 February 2018. SarahSV (talk) 20:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
International Women's Day Oxford 2018
In case you weren't aware, Mvolz (talk · contribs) has created Wikipedia:Meetups/UK/International Women's Day Oxford 2018. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
If anyone is available to evaluate this DYK entry about the life of Chandra Khonnokyoong, please do. Thank you!--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 10:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon in Portland, Oregon: Jewish Women Artists (March 8)
On March 8 (International Women's Day), and as part of the Art+Feminism project, Shoshana Gugenheim and the Oregon Jewish Museum and Center for Holocaust Education will be hosting a Wikipedia edit-a-thon to create and improve articles about Jewish women artists. Click here for more information. You can also express interest or suggest article to create or improve here. Remote participation is also welcome! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red
 
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Hi, all. We need people weighing in at Talk:Emma Portman, Viscountess Portman#Accuracy. It's about when Portman dies and therefore the accuracy of the viscountess title. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Leavitt
Does anyone know how possible or viable it would be to try to install Henrietta Swan Leavitt as an inductee into the National Women's Hall of Fame? Leavitt appears to be one of the more important historical figures in astronomy. Had she not died prematurely of cancer, she may very well have received the Nobel Prize! Paine Ellsworth put'r there 01:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Request for assistance
There is a discussion on Talk:Margaret Sanger#I have reverted the edits of NightHeron, as I think they better be discussed first that failed to attract third-party comments. Your comments are welcome there! Request put down here, as it is listed s in the interest of this WikiProject. The Banner talk 23:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
Further input would be helpful at Talk:Dorothy_Hodgkin#Apology:_change_of_reference_from_Dorothy_to_Hodgkin_without_discussion. Jytdog (talk) 13:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Featured article candidacy for Cleopatra
I'd like to inform the members of the WikiProject that I have nominated Cleopatra for Featured Article status, after a recently successful Good Article candidacy. If you are interested in making comments or offering suggestions, please feel free to visit the FA candidacy page. Pericles of AthensTalk 14:37, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Reevaluating a Wiki
Hi,
I'm working on the Emilia Lanier Wiki page for a final project in a college level course. Consequently, I have become a huge fan of Emilia Lanier, and I want to make her Wiki the best it can be. I was wondering how and when I could have this group reevaluate it's rating. It's currently a C-Class, and I would really like to bring it up to an A or B-Class.
Best, CarefulCatBird (talk) 18:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Since the article falls in the purview of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women writers, you might ping Rosiestep who created that project, but note that she is off-wiki until April 27. SusunW (talk) 14:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi CarefulCatBird and thank you for improving this article. According to ORES, it's now at B class, so I made the upgrade on the talkpage. Hope you continue to work on the Emilia Lanier article and/or other women writers after you complete your course. Also, please feel free to ping me anytime with questions. I'd be happy to collaborate with you. Happy editing! (hi SusunW; greetings from Belgrade, Serbia!) --Rosiestep (talk) 17:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hey Rosiestep hope you are enjoying your time and eating lots of cevapi—OMG I love that stuff. Thanks for helping with the article ;) SusunW (talk) 17:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Rosiestep and SusunW! Thanks so much for all of your help! I'm having fun working on the Lanier project, but I've also decided I need to work on the "Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum" article. "Salve Dues" was Lanier's only published work, and the article was basically a table of contents when I began editing. I was wondering, when you (Rosiestep) regraded the Lanier article, did you regrade it for all of the WikiProjects it was under? I'm asking on behalf of my professor. I also wanted to know so I could decide who to contact to reevaluate the "Salve Deus" article. Thanks again! CarefulCatBird (talk) 22:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi CarefulCatBird. Regarding the Emilia Lanier article, I upgraded the class to B for all the WikiProjects with this edit using the ORES tool for evaluation. I just took a look at the Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum article, and as ORES predicts the "Permanent link" of the current version is now at "C" level, I upgraded that article with this edit. So happy you are working on these! --Rosiestep (talk) 02:36, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Rosiestep and SusunW! Thanks so much for all of your help! I'm having fun working on the Lanier project, but I've also decided I need to work on the "Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum" article. "Salve Dues" was Lanier's only published work, and the article was basically a table of contents when I began editing. I was wondering, when you (Rosiestep) regraded the Lanier article, did you regrade it for all of the WikiProjects it was under? I'm asking on behalf of my professor. I also wanted to know so I could decide who to contact to reevaluate the "Salve Deus" article. Thanks again! CarefulCatBird (talk) 22:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hey Rosiestep hope you are enjoying your time and eating lots of cevapi—OMG I love that stuff. Thanks for helping with the article ;) SusunW (talk) 17:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi CarefulCatBird and thank you for improving this article. According to ORES, it's now at B class, so I made the upgrade on the talkpage. Hope you continue to work on the Emilia Lanier article and/or other women writers after you complete your course. Also, please feel free to ping me anytime with questions. I'd be happy to collaborate with you. Happy editing! (hi SusunW; greetings from Belgrade, Serbia!) --Rosiestep (talk) 17:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Since the article falls in the purview of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women writers, you might ping Rosiestep who created that project, but note that she is off-wiki until April 27. SusunW (talk) 14:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 at Women in Red
  
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Women in Red June Editathons
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you. — The Transhumanist 11:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Women in Green – call for participants
Hello all – I'd like to invite you to join Women in Green, WikiProject Women's article improvement department. The department has not been an active project in the past, but we are now working on kickstarting new collaborative work between editors to improve existing articles about women and women's works. If this sounds like something you're interested in, please add your name to Women in Green's list of active participants! You can check out more details of our discussions so far on the Women in Green talk page, plus our collaboration proposal here. Alanna the Brave (talk) 23:49, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Bimbo#Definition for the WP:Lead sentence. A permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 16:41, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Women in Red - a proposed User Group
Having worked for 2 years editing articles for Women In Red, a group of organizers have concluded that sourcing is one of the biggest hurdles in creating articles on women and non-binary genders. Though it is true that a lot of sourcing simply doesn’t exist, it is also true that there are sources, but we have no access to them. As these groups did not typically become subjects for academic study until the 1970s, many of the sources are not on line or are behind paywalls. Failure to include women and non-binary people in the encyclopedia presents a one-dimensional view of society and history. To address those issues, we are forming a new User Group aimed at referencing and support for like-minded groups and would appreciate your input or input from your supporters in our organizational process. See link: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Women_in_Red MauraWen (talk) 09:14, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Requesting article re-assessment: Odd Girls and Twilight Lovers
Hi folks -- The entry for Odd Girls and Twilight Lovers is listed as a high-importance, stub-quality article. Others and I have put some effort into improving the article in the last few months, and I hope it now passes muster for a higher rating on the quality scale. Could I request that someone less biased than I have a look at the article to re-assess its quality? Thanks! Kenirwin/(talk) 13:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
The original text was mostly about active participation of Women in WWII. I believe that women as vicitms and spies should be also described. I have partilaly rewritten the section about Poland. Many sections aren't started yet.Xx236 (talk) 10:18, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
New Page: Muslim Women in Sport
I am planning to create a new page that will discuss Muslim women's sports participation, as well as barriers they face. Does anyone have any suggestions about what subjects and topics to include? Rjpg12 (talk) 14:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
FAR
I have nominated Elaine Paige for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
September 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Paleolithic Goddess
http://profblanchardclass.blogspot.com/2011/02/prehistoric-art.html
So, I'm trying to decipher just exactly how much damage Llewellyn Press has done to Modern Wicca by constantly infusing new age nonsense in to it. I'm looking for a page referencing the Paleolithic 'Venus' and her probable relationship to the original Goddess worship which predates Baal worship as the world's oldest organized religion.. and how this original Goddess relates to Lilith, Gaia and other archetypal goddesses in the various pantheons.
I've got nothing. Zero, zip, zilch. I found two disambiguation pages on 'the Great Goddess' (which ought to be 'the Goddess - capitol G') and 'Goddess Worship'. Oh, and some academic twits decided to disenfranchise Lilith's legends in to their separate Pantheons, so you can no longer reference them all in one place.
Is this information mislabeled somewhere?? It seems like an AWFUL lot of missing data to simply not exist.
Help? Crogonint (talk) 05:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell, the closest thing to what you're looking for is Great Goddess hypothesis. It's not as detailed as you'd probably like it to be, though. Alephb (talk) 02:03, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
October 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Featured quality source review RFC
Editors in this WikiProject may be interested in the featured quality source review RFC that has been ongoing. It would change the featured article candidate process (FAC) so that source reviews would need to occur prior to any other reviews for FAC. Your comments are appreciated. --IznoRepeat (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 at Women in Red
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
January 2019 at Women in Red
 January events:
|
Ida Tarbell GAN
Hello all. I've reviewed Ida Tarbell at GAN and found it's pretty close to good but the original nominator appears to be on a wikibreak. Planning to leave it open for another seven days if someone else wants to take a crack. see here. —Ed!(talk) 22:24, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
February 2019 at Women in Red
 February events:
|
Gender feminism merge discussion
Input is requested for a discussion at Talk:Gender feminism as to whether the contents of Gender feminism should be merged into other existing articles, and if so, whether the page should become a redirect or disambiguation page. Thank you. –Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Discussion re: lead image at Woman
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Woman#A woman is more than a vagina?. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Levivich 04:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Ella Grasso
Feb 5 is the 38th anniversary of CT Gov. Ella Grasso's passing. "She was the first woman elected to this office and the first woman to be elected governor of a U.S. state without having been the spouse or widow of a former governor." I am very sad that Ella Grasso is a mere start-class biography considering her long public service and large amount of sources available. Moreover, she was a Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient. Jehochman Talk 13:37, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- I like working on articles for American women in government, so I've gone ahead and made some basic changes. I would rate the article as a C. I don't know how much more I will do on this one, but if anyone is interested in collaborating on this article, please let me know. Knope7 (talk) 03:58, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. I’m generally interested in articles on Connecticut history. I am also working on Planet Nine which is a current WP:FAC. Once that’s done I could focus on Ella Grasso’s biography. Jehochman Talk 06:29, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Importance
Apparently your assessment needed list does not cover articles with a missing importance. My DIY attempt failed unsurprisingly, but born 1950 and first female bass guitar rock star might be in scope for your project. –84.46.52.217 (talk) 05:37, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well, no. That is because the category is purely for those pages where
|class=is blank or absent. The equivalent category that shows where|importance=is blank or absent is Category:Unknown-importance Women's History articles, and that is where Talk:Suzi Quatro presently appears, since this edit by FlightTime Public (talk · contribs) which set|importance=to a blank. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)- Thanks, I missed the critical addition of
|importance=in the edit history and didn't know (or forgot) this Unknown-importance category magic. Hopefully|class=cwill be reassessed when the|importance=is determined.
–84.46.53.94 (talk) 08:30, 14 December 2018 (UTC) - Please add Woman of the Year (disambiguation) to some watchlist(s), it was in a seriously silly state. –84.46.52.2 (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)– by Knope7, thanks.
Resolved
- Thanks, I missed the critical addition of
March 2019 at Women in Red
   Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
|
WP 1.0 Bot Beta
Hello! Your WikiProject has been selected to participate in the WP 1.0 Bot rewrite beta. This means that, starting in the next few days or weeks, your assessment tables will be updated using code in the new bot, codenamed Lucky. You can read more about this change on the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team page. Thanks! audiodude (talk) 05:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Spanish women in the Civil War
Hi. I am trying to work on a series of articles about Spanish women in the Spanish Civil War so I can more easily identify more notable women where articles can be written, and, because unlike some wars (See World War II), women's involvement in this war is almost non-existent. It also seems very important given the upcoming elections, where on both the left and right, the role of women in Spain has become an issue. I am not as familiar with the topic as I would like to be, and I have not really written broad general articles of this sort in quite some time. If anyone can assist in editing articles with me on my user space until the whole series is ready to go, that would be appreciated. (Or is it better to mainspace them even if the whole series is not mainspace ready? Thoughts?) The ones that are feel almost publish ready that could use a second or third look include:
- Partido Obrero de Unificación Marxista (POUM)
- Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE)
- Confederación Nacional del Trabajo (CNT)
- Federación Anarquista Ibérica (FAI)
- Nationalist women
- Women's suffrage
- Milicianas
- Feminists
- Communists
Any assistance appreciated. --LauraHale (talk) 10:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Women's History vs. Women
After figuring out the secrets of {{Vital article}} on talk pages and a quick sanity check (WFM) I wonder why Grace Jones born 1948 is covered by the Women project, while Suzi Quatro born 1950 is covered by this project. Is that as it should be, e.g., nobody cares as long as it is not less and not more than one of both projects, and the historic person is still alive and kicking? That will replace my answered #Importance question, at most one stupid question makes perfect sense for me. –84.46.53.128 (talk) 10:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
- – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events with WIR
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Elizabeth L. Gardner up for deletion
- Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Elizabeth L. Gardner (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs|google) AfD discussion
Women Airforce Service Pilots. WW II pilot. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:47, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Notice of discussion about Jemima Wilkinson
Hello, a discussion is taking place at Talk:Jemima Wilkinson#Pronouns. As the article has < 30 watchers, I am notifying this and other wikiprojects which may have an interest. -sche (talk) 22:34, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
July events from Women in Red!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Defining/relaying the concept of "woman" at the Woman article
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Woman#Proposed edits to lede. A permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
A related RfC has commenced: Talk:Woman#RfC: Article lead. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
August 2019 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging