Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Diacritics again?

Is there any plan to create a list of red links with wrong diacritics? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I doubt you're still searching after so long but, for the benefit of later readers, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Diacritics. Certes (talk) 21:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Hogenakkal_drinking_water_project

Something must have gone wrong with the parse--there are entries all over the place that claim the bad source is in Hogenakkal_drinking_water_project, but it's clearly not. Looking at what links here tells you the correct article, though.
A few examples:
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Red_Link_Recovery/Capitalisation/52, #25510, 25513
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Red_Link_Recovery/Unlikely/images, #45-69
(and probably several more, but those are the two I've noticed.

(incidentally, there also seems to have been a problem with special characters. On the images page, every item with question marks are not actually linked from anywhere.)
Noliver (talk) 09:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Yup - something 'orrible appears to have happened to my analysis database. Most of the reports attribute a number of red links incorrectly to this article. The links (and suggestions) are all valid, just not the source article. No idea about the question marks on the images - will have to look further into that one. - TB (talk) 11:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Is anyone doing these any more?

Is anyone doing these any more? At least when I have looked at Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Capitalisation, it seems that for the last two or three weeks, I have been the only one to edit any of the pages I have looked at. JIP | Talk 20:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I do some from time to time, more or less at random. Having updated lists is a spur to having a go. welsh (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I still work on this, occasionally. EmanWilm (talk) 15:56, 26 November 2008 (UTC)