Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics/Archive 25
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |
How to describe the Emmett Till case in the lead sentence of the Emmett Till article
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Emmett Till#RfC: Should we include the "accused of showing an interest in a white woman" aspect in the lead or specifically the lead sentence?. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 16:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I want to notify you about the article Cold War II, which I have mostly edited. Mainly I added the "US-China relations" section per RfC in Talk:Cold War II. For the time being, this article attracts those wanting to expand the content about US-Russia relations related to the topic (and its interchangeable terms). Initially, the article was created in response to events related to the US-Russia tensions. However, it experienced discussions, like the titling and the sourcing, leading to revamping the article. This year, attempts to insert presumably original research and unverifiable claims have been reverted, especially via more discussions. One suggested another AfD after the first one failed. I hope those interested in politics would be interested in preserving and watching this article. It is still attracting more presumptions related to US-Russia relations. I also hope that original research will be repelled in the future. --George Ho (talk) 22:00, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Merger proposal of Battle of Chamdo into Incorporation of Tibet into the People's Republic of China
Merger of Battle of Chamdo into Incorporation of Tibet into the People's Republic of China is proposed. It is discussed at Talk:Incorporation of Tibet into the People's Republic of China#Merger Discussion, where I invite you to comment. --George Ho (talk) 03:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Wikipedia talk:Citation overkill#Should this essay be changed to encourage more citations?. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of The Plot to Hack America for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Plot to Hack America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Plot to Hack America until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 20:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Government page
I've fleshed out the long-standing stub article a bit, but it could use multiple additional editors. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:24, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Primacy discussed at Talk:Joint Communiqué
Hello. I opened the discussion at Talk:Joint Communiqué about the current title and primacy role of Joint Communiqué, an agreement between South Vietnam and Buddhist sect. --George Ho (talk) 00:49, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted RM at Template talk:2016 US Election AE
The ongoing RM discussion at Template talk:2016 US Election AE is relisted, so feel free to comment there until closure. --George Ho (talk) 01:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
 Hello, |
Nomination of Tony Chang for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Chang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Chang until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 17:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Opening sentence discussion at Talk:Breitbart News
Hello. I opened the discussion about the opening sentence of "Breitbart News" at "Talk:Breitbart News#Reinsert "described as" in opening sentence?". Join in. --George Ho (talk) 17:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
RfC regarding the WP:Lead guideline -- the first sentence
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#Request for comment on parenthetical information in first sentence. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of 2017 Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice team for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice team until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nominator's note: I feel that having a stand-alone article for this is WP:UNDUE, and do not expect people on the talk page to be interested in merge proposals. Power~enwiki (talk) 00:12, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong
Is the Pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong the only notable pro-democracy camp? See talk:Pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- 65.94.42.131 (talk) 03:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Parliament Challenge
Let me invite you to participate in a new edition challenge: Parliament Challenge. This is a writing contest to create or improve articles about Spanish parlament members. This year Spain celebrates the 40th anniversary of the first democratic elections after the dictatorship. More information at the page on meta. Thanks! --Millars (talk) 23:27, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Good article reassessment
Narendra Modi, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Lorstaking (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Excessive references in Alt-right lede section
The article Alt-right has 48 references in the lede paragraph. I made a proposed change [1] to decrease this, but two editors oppose this on the talk page. I feel that decreasing the number of references in the lede is definitely necessary according to Wikipedia style. Does anyone have recommendations on how to proceed? Power~enwiki (talk) 05:36, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
I've attempted to improve that page, as well as to improve the 5 main Democratic candidates with Wikipedia pages; they likely need further improvements:
I also created a redirect for Bob Daiber, who may become a notable candidate, but doesn't appear to be one now. Power~enwiki (talk) 03:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Are the latter three actually notable? All of them appear to fail WP:NPOLITICIAN. Number 57 11:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Pritzker and Kennedy are notable as "people from rich and famous families" rather than as politicians. Chicago is a prominent enough town that city council members (alderman) may be notable, and Pawar is one of the most notable (from publicity for his Senate run if nothing else); I believe he meets NPOL. Power~enwiki (talk) 01:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Elijah Daniel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elijah Daniel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah Daniel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 04:22, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Peer reveiw nomination of Government of India
A article you may be interested in is currently undergoing Peer review .Please add commentsRADICAL SODA(FORCE) 06:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)