Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian Law/Archive

Constitutional Amendments

Created an article: One Hundred and Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of India. Do have a look for any changes and standard assessment. Noticed in the Constitution of India series template that there's a bunch of missing Constitutional Amendments- that could be a list of articles for creation to take up. Sirmirror (talk) 14:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties of India

I have nominated Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties of India for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User script to detect unreliable sources

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is the scope of this project?

Does it include Indian lawyer and judge biographies as well? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the introduction to the project page suggests otherwise. Given the terrible coverage of just statute law and caselaw at present, it would be a massive advantage if we covered primary sources of law properly atleast, as well as synthetic articles describing debates on the primary sources. Norm88 (talk) 12:07, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Directive Principles

Directive Principles has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:48, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marking as inactive and merging with WikiProject Indian Politics

Does anyone mind if I mark this project as inactive and we try to subsume its aims under a more active WikiProject like Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics?

cc @MPGuy2824 @MohitSingh @Sirmirror @AirshipJungleman29 Norm88 (talk) 12:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's probably fair. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. It now hard-redirects to Wikipedia:WikiProject Law. Norm88 (talk) 16:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]