Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cambridge/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Cambridge. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Tasks to do
Some suggestions for organised things to do:
- Check through Cambridge articles to ensure they all have geographic co-ordinates. Tag with {{LocateMe}} initially and then find the co-ordinates
- Check through Cambridge articles to see what photos are needed. Create a sub-category of Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in England for them
We should do this in an organised fashion to prevent repitition.
Rich257 (talk) 21:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- I have created a subpage of the wikiproject to deal with your idea about Images. It is at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cambridge/Images. I like the cooridinate idea although i'm not sure how to actualy find the co-ordinates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pi (talk • contribs) 20:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- The preferable way would be to use the existing mechanism, which is to use {{reqphoto|in=Cambridge}}, which would add them to a new catgeory Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Cambridge.
- All the information on geographic co-ordinates is on the WP:GEO project page. Rich257 (talk) 20:20, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Scope of this project, overlap with University of Cambridge WikiProject
I see that a lot of articles about the university have just been tagged with this WikiProject's banner. As there is already a University of Cambridge WikiProject, do we really want to lay claim to all these? It seems to leave that project with nothing to do. Maybe we should restrict this project to non-university articles?
Stephen Turner (Talk) 20:39, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I agree that we should focus efforts on those articles which aren't supported by the other wikiproject but i am still in favour of tagging the articles as they're some of the most important cambridge articles, and surely any article can benefit from input.Pi —Preceding comment was added at 09:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)