Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternate History/Archive 1

Archive 1

The Emberverse series = alternate history?

Is Emberverse series actually alternate history or is it more post-apoc/sci fi? I know Uchronia.com does not list it as alternate history, but what do you guys think? Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Personaly I'd classify it as 99% post-apoc/sci fi, 1% alt history and so not really without the scope of an alternate history project. From that main article, "The Change" was only six years before first published and so the point of the diverage from the real history is very recent, perhaps about the time the author started writing the book? Now if someone has info showing a point of departure further in the past, that might change my opinon. Jon (talk) 17:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Good point. I did know Uchronia does not list it as alternate history, but I wanted to see other opinions about the series. Is the fact that its in the same unviverse as the Nantucket series make a difference? Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 18:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I'd classify it as a bit more balanced, maybe 75% post-apoc/sci fi, 25% alt history or 66% post-apoc/sci fi, 33% alt history. The Change happened at the same instant as The Event in the Nantucket series, of which the first book was released in 1998. The 1998 date (can't remember it exactly, sometime in March, I think) is the PoD of the series -- there isn't anything earlier. However, the PoD is now over 10 years ago, so I think it's a bit more alt history than 1%. It's also related to the Nantucket series, which definetly falls into alternate history. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 19:38, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Nantucket series itself is clearly alt history in the same sub genre as 1632. But Emberverse is in a slightly different universe (the one where the island did not appear in the past but the change occurs sending the island into the past of a different universe & knocking out electricy for the rest of the worth. Also the measuring point for how far back a PoD is doesn't change as time pasts past date of first publication of the novel. (Otherwise novels in the 1930s set in the 1960s would have a PoD fourty years ago when in actualy it's merely outdated future SF). Also in a series it's normally the first book in the series that's writen that serves as the comparsion. (In TL-191 point of depature would be compared against publication date of How Few Remain and not In At The Death) Jon (talk) 17:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I found an interview with Stirling where he mentions that the Emberverse series barely meets the requirements for alternate history. With that mention and Jon's arguments I am convinced that the series is not alternate history. Unless someone can make a better argument I will be changing all of the Emberverse articles soon.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 17:31, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Membership drive?

How's this for a member userbox?

This user is a member of WikiProject Alternate History.

Or (to show I'm completely non-partisan) this?

This user is a member of WikiProject Alternate History.

Or this?

This user is a member of WikiProject Alternate History.

Or this?

This user is a member of WikiProject Alternate History.

Or, if you don't mind poking a little fun

This user is a member of WikiProject Alternate History. Or just very confused.

Ta. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 22:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

August 2008 Collaboration

I think every month we should pool our efforts into improving one article dealing with alternate history. For our first collaboration, which will begin on August 1st, I nominate Alternate history. The article is in need of a cleanup and could do with some more cites. Is that cool or are there any other nominees? Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

That's probably the best choice for our first article. Always a good idea to begin at the beginning. Also, while I'm here, where precisely do we draw the line with classifying articles as alternate history? Timeline-191 is obviously AH, but what about Nineteen Eighty-Four? Even though at the time it was published it was considered speculative fiction, the time the events took place is long past, and technically qualifies as an AH. Then there's a few of H.G. Wells' works, like The World Set Free and The Shape of Things to Come which have a similar dilemma. I figure we can be broad and accept these works and others as AH, or we can come up with specific requirements an article must meet in order to be considered AH (a relatively identifiable POD, definable differences from events of our timeline, whether or not the work was intended by the author to be AH rather than speculation, etc.). -- Comandante {Talk} 21:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Alternate history is a good starting point. As far as the boundaries, we should probably come up with some requirements. We also need to get an assessment scale created (probably based on WP:SF's assessment scale). -- Imperator3733 (talk) 22:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to throw out that we don't recognize novels and other forms of media like 1984 as alternate history. For example is 2001: A Space Odyssey alternate history just because the time it was set has come and gone? The list goes on and on, but books like that would be better served in other categories. I just don't think that is really what alternate history is. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 02:17, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Agreed, to the extent that events in 1984 and 2001 Space Odyssey don't agree with reality (quite major for 1984, more minor for 2001) they are outdated futurestic sci/fi; not alternative history. Jon (talk) 17:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Does anyone know of any good class article we may want to model the alternate history article after? Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 22:54, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Today begins our August collaboration on Alternate history. I've added a To do list template on the talk page where we can list things that need to be done to improve the article. Our biggest concern would be finding credible sources for it. I think though its possible to elevate the article to Good status. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:07, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

So there's been a lot of work done on the alternate history article, so if you haven't seen it you should check it out. What it really needs though is a good proofreading, and that's something I'm not that great at. Please take some time to read the article and make some changes. Also keep a look out for excessive examples and things that may need to be cited. I did a lot of research yesterday and found a bunch of articles I plan to work into the article as soon as I get a chance to read them all.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:25, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

I've done some proofreading on Alternate history and I'll be doing some more soon. I've also started using WP:AWB with a recursive category for Category:Alternate history. There are over 2000 pages with that setting, however, so if anyone else has WP:AWB access feel free to use it to help! -- Imperator3733 (talk) 20:20, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

There are a hell of a lot of examples of alternate histories depending on the medium. Several need to be cut and we need to leave just the notable ones. I figure mostly just the first examples and any award winners.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 15:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Shortcut

We should probably get a shortcut created for the project. The obvious choice would be WP:AH, but, that one's already taken by WikiProject Australian history. Does anyone have any other ideas? WP:ALTHIST is available (and is now a shortcut to here), but there should probably also be another, shorter shortcut. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 22:50, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Maybe WP:ALTH (obvious) or WP:OTL (less obvious, but familiar to AH hobbyists; however, probably too subtle for conventional use). -- Comandante {Talk} 23:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Good ideas, they're now shortcuts. I think those are good for shortcuts (although if WP:WikiProject Australian history suddenly decides they don't want WP:AH anymore, we should definetly use that one as well :) ). -- Imperator3733 (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Good job on that. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 02:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi

I just noticed that someone added this group's template to Fallout (video game). I would just like to say, neat group! Good luck with your efforts. There was this neat short story in an anthology edited by Gardner Dozois about Superman crash-landing in Bavaria instead of Kansas as a baby, and later being accused of war crimes in a tribunal following World War II. Maybe you'll write about that one day! SharkD (talk) 03:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

North American Confederacy

This article has been proposed to be deleted. If anyone thinks it should be saved, you should enter the debate. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 03:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Since the tag used to propose deletion was remove the tag if you object, I've done so. (Name of the series and therefore the logical name for an article dealing with that series). I have however added a cleanup tag since it does need a major rewrite. Jon (talk) 17:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

I did some work on the article, added some references, links, and a section about awards. I haven't tried to rewrite it though because I have not read the books myself. You know its funny, here I am trying to save the article and I'm considered one of the enemy in the book (those evil "Hamiltonians, haha). Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 20:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Assessment scale

I have started working on the assessment scale. Feel free to start assessing pages that fall under the WikiProject. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 01:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Please everyone check this place out, especially the Requesting an Assessment section.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 22:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I split the Requesting an Assessment section into 2 parts. The first section is for articles that have not been assessed yet and the other is for articles that should be re-assessed. This will make assessment easier. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 18:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Alternative history=Alternate history

Keep an eye out for older articles that use "alternative history" instead of alternate history. I changed a bunch of them but I'm pretty sure I haven't gotten all of them. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 15:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

New article page

Having just joined the project, is there a new article page for it? If not, it might be a useful addition, if yes, can somebody point me to it? Thanks, EA210269 (talk) 15:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Since the project is still relatively new we do not have a new article page yet, but you right it is something we need to create. For now if you need help I can point you to some useful articles to use as examples. What are you trying to create? Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 15:28, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Not looking for anything specific, just wondering. If there was a page, I would add it to my watchlist. EA210269 (talk) 15:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I created a novel template (most of the pages we tag seem to be novels) in my sandbox. Feel free to comment or edit it and if everyone is cool with it I will use it to start a new page article. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 15:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

It's a fairly complex template, I have to say. But it's excellent, I used it as a guidance for adding a few sections to the Roma Eterna article, it came quite handy! EA210269 (talk) 11:32, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Well in all honesty I borrowed it from the Novels WikiProject, but maybe with some tweaking we can make it useful for our purposes. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:09, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Just a note to those adding new articles to have the publisher and ISBN# on hand alone with a reference or awards on hand before creating them. There's someone currently removing fictional novel articles that fail notability. Jon (talk) 18:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

See WP:BK for guidelines.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 20:51, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Questions

1. For the Charles Stross Merchant Prince stories, why are 3 rated as mid importance and 1 rated low?

2. Are we now saying that any story with parallel universes in which one or more universes are alternate history universes part of this project? This would encompass almost all parallel universe stories. I don't have a problem with this, but I think that we should be clear on this point.

Dfmclean (talk) 15:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

My bad I wasn't paying attention, I have reassed them unless someone disagrees with my choice. As for #2, while you may be correct that not every parallel universe story is AH, some are when the universe in question deals with a change in the past like these novels. Also the fact that it won the Sidewise Award for Alternate History is a credible reason that the universe is AH. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 16:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

I just wanted to clarify things. For example, Heinlein's Number of the Beast is a parallel universe story in which some alternate histories are encountered. The TV show Sliders is almost entirely parallel universes with alternate histories. There are parallel universe stories where alternate histories certainly exist but are not a particularly important part of the plot (Zelazny's Amber books). Dfmclean (talk) 16:26, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

I completely agree with you (also there is Sidewise in Time and the Paratime Patrol universe), but I think the Merchant Prince stories are alternate histories. For others we will have to just take a case by case basis.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 16:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Map requests

I went ahead and took care of our first (and currently only) map request (see here for the map). Just wondering what the protocol should be: should I just remove the request from the list entirely, or should we begin some kind of archive of map requests for posterity? -- Comandante {Talk} 01:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

I kind of like the archive idea, would a seperate page be worth it or maybe a category?Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 02:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

I'd go for the separate page myself, but I must warn you I have a bias against categories (too bureaucratic; and who looks at them anyway? Is there even a list of all of the categories out there? Where does it end?!?!). -- Comandante {Talk} 03:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Haha, alright no category. A page sounds good. I'm also going to look for a few more articles that need maps.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 04:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Articles up for deletion

Two articles (Gray Victory and Clash of Eagles) have been listed for deletion. If anyone knows anything about these articles and thinks they should be kept, you should probably stop by and see what you can do.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 00:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

FYI: The nomination for deletion has been withdrawn for Gray Victory but remains for Clash of Eagles. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 18:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Clash has been kept.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 20:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Timeline 191 article cleanup

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternate History/to do

There are a lot of articles created for this series, see here: Category:Timeline-191. Most of these need major cleanups and may need to be deleted or merged. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 15:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Here's one that would be safe to delete: Participants in World War II (Timeline-191) with a redirect to the Timeline 191 World War II article. (With that article also changed to avoid circular references). Jon (talk) 17:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Freedom Party guards (Harry Turtledove) should also be merged into the Freedom Party article. Jon (talk) 17:52, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Good point on the participants article, I redirected it after making a few changes to the WWII article. Also Operation Blackbeard could be added to the article also.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:05, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

List of Battles there:

• Barell Roll -> propose merging into the Timeline 191 WW 2 article
• Battle of the Three Navies -> propose merging into the Timeline 191 WW 1 article
• Camp Hill -> Propose merging into the Main Timeline 191 article.
• Operation Blackbeard -> propose merging into the Timeline 191 WW 2 articles.

Jon (talk) 17:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Would it make sense to merge the all of pages for each seperate series (Great War, American Empire, Settling Accounts) into the main Timeline 191 article.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 20:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

The TL 191 main article is already long enough as is. As an alternative, I would sugest merging TL 191 WW 1 into Great War and TL 191 WW 2 into Settling Accounts. We should also where TL 191 article is more detailed than How Few Remain, Great War, American Empire, and Settling Accounts move details to the sub pages and then rewrite TL 191 as more of a summary with links to them. Jon (talk) 18:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Fictional Book: Over Open Sights definately fast fails notability standard (no publisher & no ISBN# in the real world). Sugest merging into Jake Featherston's article (the fictional author). Jon (talk) 18:12, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

I wonder if the Jake Featherston article should be merged into the characters article?Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 23:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Last time I checked the Characters article was already too big; that's probably why Jake Featherstone got his own article in the first place. Jon (talk) 17:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Jon if you get the chance please take a look at the new new Jake Featherston article I am working on in my sandbox.19:22, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

I have added some sources and some info on Over Open Sights to the new Featherston article I have been working on in my sandbox. As soon as I do some proof reading on the bio (which is almost completely the same as the old article) I'm going to put it up and then redirect Over Open Sights to that article.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 21:48, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Looks good to me; I've changed it slightly to refer to him as a major viewpoint char to be more NPOV. (Major because there is less than a handful of chars that are viewpoint chars for that entire timeframe.) Jon (talk) 17:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm noticing that some articles use "Southern Victory" instead of "Timeline 191" to name the series. I'm assuming this problem has arised because Turtledove has not yet named the series. Still if no one has a problem with it I propose we change all articles to reflect the Timeline 191 name since its the name of the main article and the category.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Jon (talk) 17:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Another proposal, I thinking of spliting Institutions in the Southern Victory (Timeline-191) series into three different articles: United States of America (Timeline 191), Confederate States of America (Timeline 191), and Other nations in Timeline 191. The first two would be based off the usual template used for nations in Wikipedia with the ficitonal references thrown in. The last one would be simply a list of excess information. Thoughts?Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

I have started working on how the United States article will look if anyone is interested. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 02:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

After doing some work on this part of the project I have started to lose interest. It might make more sense just to shorten and reorganize the Institution article. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 21:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

WWII Alternate Histories

Is there enough info to create an article just on WWII Alternate Histories? See Category:World War II alternate histories for more info.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, in order to make such an glorified category page some sort of classification scheme would need to be devised. (Perhaps four listings: A) Japan defeated but not Germany B) Germany defeted but not Japan C) Both Germany & Japan victrious D) Both Germany & Japan lose (but thru some other way). Class D stories aren't very much in the popular literature now but there were quite a few stories by those in the German & Japanese militaries in the late 40s to mid 50s of how if one of their superiors hadn't make [fill in the blank] blunder they would have lasted longer before being defeated. Jon (talk) 18:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Speaking of World War II alternate histories, many of them have long "See also" sections to the point that they are becoming lists. I propose we shorten them where we find them to only reflect those articles that are similar. For example if we are dealing with a novel that deals with a total Nazi victory like High Castle, than the See Also section should only reflect similar novels and not for example Iron Dream or Plot Against America which did not deal with a Nazi victory.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 14:04, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I'd be in favor of droping see also lists entirely that aren't in the same series. Jon (talk) 17:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Material for "A Different Flesh" article

• Summary: A Different Flesh is a collection of short stories by Harry Turtledove in which Neathdrals and other other extinct species survied in the Americas instead of Native Americans.
• Point of Divergence: Prehistoric
• Timeframe: C. 1600 to C. 1990 (present at the time of pubication)
• Relation to other works by the author: This is one of the first published works by Turtledove.

Jon (talk) 17:57, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Project banner

Can someone figure out how to get rid of the warning above {{Alternate History WikiProject}} on the project page? |category=no is set, so I don't know what's going on. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 15:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm just going to remove it for the time being, the text is pretty clear on how you place the banner on articles.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 15:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Watchmen FAR

Watchmen has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Gary King (talk) 15:47, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

New userbox

I've created a new userbox for people involved in the assessment efforts:

AHThis user assesses articles for WikiProject
Alternate History.

Just add {{User WP AH assessment}} to your user page. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 05:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Nice. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

The Peshawar Lancers

I'm going to be doing some work on The Peshawar Lancers article. I will be adding a themes and literary reception section, plus adding a short plot summary of the short story prequal to the novel. I have a list of sources in one of my sandboxes, but if anyone has links to places I should check out, please share. Any help you wish to provide would be greatly appreciated, especially copyediting since my grammar is usually pretty bad. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 14:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

I pretty much finished with this but I have decided instead of just writing a section for Shikari in Galveston, I am going to write an article. Anyone who wants to collaborate should contact me on my talk page. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 21:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

The new article is complete. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 19:54, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Alternate history

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection before December 2008, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 16:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

There are five articles chosen that are tagged by this project and they are listed here. Keep an eye on them and do any editing to help improve. Note that the alternate history article is on the list. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 21:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

The Domination

Is wondering if anyone else is planning to improve the articels Under the Yoke and The Stone Dogs, have currently started to read Under the Yoke, with aim to read the second one aswell, if anyone else is we could take one articel each or something. --> Halmstad, Talk to me, charla a mí, entretien à moi, Gespräch zu mir 17:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

I haven't read either story but I can help with compiling a list of sources to use to create a theme and literary criticism section. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 19:54, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

You should read it, its good. Lets see when im done with Under the Yoke. --> Halmstad, Talk to me, charla a mí, entretien à moi, Gespräch zu mir 12:05, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

I took your advice and bought a copy of The Domination I found at my local book store. I'm right now reading Marching through Georgia but will probably get to the other novels soon. My offer to do research still stands. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 17:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Alien space bats

I have created a possible "alien space bats" article in one of my sandboxes. Please take a look at it and comment on it. I'm worried about creating it because there have been attempts before and they have been deleted, but I believe this one has enough sources to prove notability. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 18:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

I fixed the wikilink error for you. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 15:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Also I have created the article, check it out: Alien space bats. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 19:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Terry Pratchett's Nation

I added the Alternate History template to the article on Nation (novel). It can be implied from some of the goings on in the book, but Pratchett outright says as much in his notes in the back.

Though not a member of this project, I did set class to start. Just seemed as if there was more than enough to take it out of stub. IMHO (talk) 22:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

I have seen sources that confirm its an alternate history, when I find them again I will see if they are of any use. Thanks. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 15:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Should we be archiving this page?

I was wondering if we should start archiving this page. If no one has any problem with that, I'll set up an automatic archive. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 16:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay, let's see if this works... -- Imperator3733 (talk) 18:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Yay! It worked! :) -- Imperator3733 (talk) 19:17, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Archive issues temporarily fixed (sort of)

I've commented out the ClueBot III template code which handles the archiving. In its place, I put a link to the current archive. This seems to have fixed the problems with the extra wikilinks, but it does mean that no more automatic archiving can happen. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 17:40, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Emberverse

After reading several reviews on Dies the Fire I think its safe to say that the Emberverse series of book does count as alternate history for several reasons: 1) various reviewers call it an alternate history, 2) the POD happens in the past, the proximity to the present or implausibility of the event does not make it any less an alternate history, 3) Stirling himself considers it alternate history. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 19:04, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

1632 series

Most of the articles for the books in the 1632 series need a lot of work. Many of them read like advertisements to the series. 1634: The Baltic War had three plot summaries from other novels. You can find all of them in this category:Category:1632 series books. I propose a collaborative effort because they all need some serious work. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 14:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Tarrantry

If anyone has information for this article it would be really helpful. As it currently stands I don't think it has enough notability to survive an AfD. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 20:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Uchronia: The Alternate History List

Please check out this new article I created. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

WWII alternate histories

I'm working on a new article World War II alternate histories. I hope to do some serious work on it in January, but if anyone wants to help just go to my Sandbox. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 03:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

AFD Notice: Assiti Shards effect

It looks like Assiti Shards effect may be deleted. Personally I don't think its notable myself but if anyone else thinks the article has merit you may want to intervene. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 16:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Jonbar Hinge

Can I get some help watching this page, some IPs have been putting a lot of unsourced stuff and now it has just gotten weird. Here is what was recently added: "Postmodern counterfactualists contend that Jonbar Hinges have always been with us but were rendered invisible by the discourses of positivism and Whiggish history. It is also possible that Williamson uncovered the Jonbar Hinge while himself time traveling through consciousness expansion, during which it was revealed to him by Krishna, making the discovery of the Jonbar Hinge itself a Jonbar Hinge."

Please just revert stuff like this if you see it. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 00:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

AH Civil War category?

We currently have Category:World War II alternate histories , however there seem to be almost as many US Civil War Alternate Histories (or at least where the Point of Departure is during the US Civil are), what do people think of Category:US Civil War alternate histories ?Naraht (talk) 17:44, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Sounds like such a good idea I'm surprized there isn't already such a category. Jon (talk) 18:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to create under the name Category:American Civil War alternate histories since the name of the Wikipedia page is American Civil War. Also, it may be worthwhile to consider American War for Independence as a category, though I'm not sure how many that would have.Naraht (talk) 19:39, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

We should probably make an article for AH Civil Wars also since its one of the two most often subject of English alternate histories. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 20:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Turtledove's Atlantis series

Is anyone interested on a collaborative attempt to create three articles: The Atlantis Series, Opening Atlantis, and United States of Atlantis. I found some sources here: [1], [2], [3]. I would do it myself but I haven't read any of the novels. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 22:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

• I haven't read any of the novels either and I won't have time to do so for a while, so I won't be able to help for now. I did notice that all three of those reviews seemed to be the same, and two of them had the same author, but the third had a different author. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 19:03, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Here is a possible other source [4] Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 23:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

AFD Notice: Tarrantry

Tarrantry has been nominated to be deleted. If anyone has info that can save this article, you may want to act quickly. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 16:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Of course they'd do that. I just wish I could've gotten the text before the deletionists deleted it. Oh well, I have other things to work on. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 03:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

It will probably appear on Deletionpedia relatively soon. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 16:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 04:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Assiti Shards / 1632 / Ring of Fire

Can someone make a taskforce, workgroup or noticeboard for this? The talk page for a pseudo-project involving these works is actually spread across the talk pages of several articles and categories. It would be better to consolidate the "project related" talk in one location, and also since such talk violates the protocols of use concerning article and category talk pages, it should be elsewhere (ie. they are not talking about improving the article/category in question, but about series templates, new book articles, etc)

Suggestion is: WikiProject Alternate History/Assiti Shards noticeboard or WikiProject Alternate History/Assiti Shards task force or WikiProject Alternate History/Assiti Shards work group

That way the talk can be moved to that talk page, and the various article/template/category talk pages can be archived, cleaned up to make them about their related article/template/category pages, and those unrelated threads moved to the new centralized discussion. (and a switch would need to be added to the AH WikiProject template indicating the new taskforce/workgroup)

{{#invoke:WikiProject banner|main
|PROJECT          = Alternate History
 |BANNER_NAME     = Template:Alternate History WikiProject
 |small  = {{{small|}}}
 |category= {{{category|¬}}} 
 |listas = {{{listas|}}}
|PROJECT_LINK     = Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternate History
|IMAGE_LEFT       = ConfederateLincoln.png
|IMAGE_LEFT_LARGE = 90px
|QUALITY_SCALE    = yes
 |class  = {{{class|}}}
|IMPORTANCE_SCALE = yes
 |importance = {{{importance|}}}
|MAIN_CAT         = WikiProject Alternate History articles

|tf 1 = {{{assiti|{{{Assiti|{{{1632|}}}}}}}}}
 |TF_1_LINK       = Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternate History/Workgroups/Assiti Shards
 |TF_1_NAME       = the Assiti Shards notice board
 |TF_1_NESTED     = Assiti Shards
 |TF_1_IMAGE      = <div style="font-size:3em; line-height:1;">1632</div>
 |TF_1_IMPORTANCE = yes
  |tf 1 importance={{{assiti-importance|{{{Assiti-importance|{{{1632-importance|}}}}}}}}}
  |TF_1_ASSESSMENT_CAT=Assiti Shards articles
}}

76.66.193.90 (talk) 12:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I would be willing to create the task force if there is enough interest. God knows those articles need a lot of work. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 15:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

If there's not enough interest for a TF or WG, a notice board could be set up, which could be upgraded to a TF or WG at a later time. 76.66.201.179 (talk) 06:06, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

A noticebox could be added like:

or somesuch. 76.66.201.179 (talk) 06:11, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 08:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Size of rewritting and contents

Is currently rewritting the plot summary on Weapons of Choice as i see it being partly incorrect and also in a bit of need of rewritting, however in unsure how detailed i should be with the summary, have about dubbled the "The Transition" part, any suggestion ? --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 21:18, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

While there is no official plot summary length, I recommend keeping under 700 words, though if you must don't let it go over 1000. I would also suggest adding some reviews for a reception and theme section to improve the article as a whole. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 21:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

On a side note I think we should look into deleting some of those characters section in the three novels since there is already a character article for the series. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 21:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

New plot summary up and running. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 00:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I made some spelling and grammar changes but I didn't look at the summary in depth because I haven't read the novel yet. Has anyone read the novel and would like to take a closer look at the plot summary? Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 02:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

WP:NOT#PLOT

Apologies for the notice, but this is being posted to every WikiProject to avoid accusations of systemic bias. Hiding T 13:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Nantucket series characters

Just wanna make project members aware of a minor sugestion i made about the Nantucket series character list. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 13:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

My bad, perhaps should have said its on the talk page. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 00:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

AFD Notice

A debate is going on about whether or not to delete the Assiti Shards effect article: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assiti Shards effect. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 20:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Another AFD

A large number of Timeline 191 articles have been nominated for deletion as a group at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hispano-Japanese War. Edward321 (talk) 19:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

1632

a large number of 1632 templates and some articles are up for deletion. Considering several cleanup attempts for 1632 on this talk page, this was likely to come up. 76.66.192.64 (talk) 06:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Could you list the AfD discussions here? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Assiti Shards effect was recently deleted. Grantville Gazette VIII is currently open for discussion and here is the Template related deletion discussions: Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 22. Note: this entire series of articles needs some major work done. Anyone interested in heading up a 1632 Task Force? Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 16:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Revitalizing the Project

Recently several alternate history articles have been deleted and there are proposals to delete more. Whether you agree or not with the deletions, this is a sign that the alternate history related articles on Wikipedia need some serious work.

As members of WikiProject Alternate History, we can work together to improve these articles so such a mass deletion will not happen again. I know this project has been dormant for sometime, but I feel that it can be revitalized if we pull together.

If you are still interested in being a member of this Project, here are some ideas I have that we can work on:

1. Improve the Alternate history article to Good and then Featured class. This should be the flagship article of our project. I have been working on a new version in my sandbox if anyone is interested to see: User:Zombie Hunter Smurf/Sandbox3
2. Complete a serious reorganization of the 1632 series articles before they are mass deleted like the Timeline 191 articles.
3. Elect project coordinators (I’m thinking at least three) who keep the project on track by encouraging collaborative work and brainstorming new ideas.
4. Restart the monthly collaborative projects to improve certain articles.
5. Continue tagging alternate history related articles with the project banner and invite users to join the group.

If you have any questions, comments or any ideas please feel free to share them. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I've listed myself as a supporter. I hope to be more active, but am not sure I will have the time. The Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron could be a useful resource to help improve article up for deletion. Edward321 (talk) 14:27, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for that suggestion. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 14:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

While it is for use with a role playing game I would recommend GURPS Infinite Worlds as a good starting point. I and going over there to start making the article more suitable for this.--BruceGrubb (talk) 15:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

1632 Series AFD Notices

Do to the large number of AFD's regarding the 1632 series, I will be listing them here. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 17:57, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll notify the Bar about this AfD, and we could consider transwify to 1632 wiki. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

I've been moving a few of them to the Eric Flint Wiki, but that place is kind of dead. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 16:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

At least it's wikia, which means it has a chance of getting resurrected one day. Private wikis are just like private websites - they rot and die. This is why I like WMF wikis, and wiki farms like Wikia, much more so then independent projects - you can never be certain when all the work you put into them will evaporate... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Well then unless anyone has any objections I will keep moving articles to the Eric Flint Wiki. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 17:29, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

It has been suggested that some of the currently proposed deletes could be combined into a 1632 fandom article. The fandom of the seires might have some notability. According to some preliminary research I did they have conventions (Ctrl F 1632). Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 18:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

That's a good point, I've even been to one of those :) I'd not be suprised if they were covered by some reliable sources (local newspapers in Virginia, for example?). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

You are probably better placed to get some of that info. If you can find some sources I could write an article. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:08, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

AFDs

• 1632 series battles: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 series battles.
• 1632 Editorial Board: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 Editorial Board.
• Grantville Gazette VIII: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grantville Gazette VIII
• Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 22, Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 23, Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 24, Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 26, Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 27, Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 28, Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 29, Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 31, Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 August 3, Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 August 4
• Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 July 23.
• 1632 universe background history: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 universe background history (2nd nomination)
• 1632 writers: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 writers (Note: this was redirected to The Grantville Gazettes)
• 1632 plot threads: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 plot threads (Note: this was merged into the 1632 series article)
• 1632 institutions: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 institutions
• Mike Stearns: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Stearns (Note: the debate closure states this will be merged into the List of 1632 characters (fictional) article)
• 1632 places: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 places
• 1632 multiverse (expired prod)

(edit 2) So what I'm seeing is that 6 articles have already been deleted, after around one week's worth of discussion, and three will be merged into articles that are too large to contain them. (The templates were too complex imho, so I'm not concerned by those deletions.) But why are these article deletions being ramrodded through? I thought deletion discussions gave people time to comment. I am gravely concerned by this, and I don't even know where to lodge a complaint. Tkech (talk) 09:09, 5 August 2009 (UTC) (edited minutes later after finding the other votes were also complete. grr.) Tkech (talk) 09:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC) (edit 2 - seems I am online at the same time as the admins who are closing out the debates, the last one just closed. ;-( Tkech (talk) 09:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC))

I think seven days is long enough to discuss. And I don't consider that "ramrodding" them; a number of the articles are inappropriate and it seems a number of people think so. Also note that Becky Stearns was merged and redirected. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 17:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

The Grantville Gazettes

Since GGVIII has recently been deleted, it is entirely possible that more of the Gazettes would be target making it imperative in improving the articles to prevent deletion. Since 1-4 were published in print it shouldn't be difficult to find third party reliable sources. Since the rest, however, have not been published as such they may prove more difficult. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 20:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

FYI, all the online versions of the Grantville Gazettes are up for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grantville Gazette IV. For some reason Grantville Gazette IV is also listed even though it was published in hardcover. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 15:47, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Since we obviously won't have a chance or time to improve these articles before the deletions are completed ... where does the deleted article material get archived? I have clicked all kinds of links and get only dead ends. :( Tkech (talk) 13:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I have been moving most of the deleted material to the Eric Flint Wiki though for many articles I have broken up (like the 1632 institutions and places). Also I haven't finished moving the Grantville Gazette articles or the 1632 writers (though I have that article saved on my computer). I believe if you want to get access to deleted articles you need to talk to the admin who deleted it. To be honest with you the only article I didn't move to the Eric Flint Wiki was the 1632 universe background, but that article was worthless. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:25, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm an admin and have set up an account there. You can post a note on my talk page if you wish. Feel free, even the ones I've listed for deletion. My view is that they belong there, not here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Grantville

So... considering that the deletion discussions got some sort of activity here, does that mean that a task force for 1632 will be set up, like the suggestion from last year? 76.66.200.21 (talk) 07:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

I have no problem creating such a task force, but it would need a coordinator and I don't have the time to to lead such a group. Are you interested in being the coordinator of the task force? Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Pardon my ignorance. :$ What does a "task force" do? Perhaps you could point me at an article? (As an aside, three people have been working consistently at the Eric Flint wikia and have captured the wikipedia-deleted 1632/Gazette articles as best we could.) Tkech (talk) 20:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

A task force (TF) is a sub-wikiproject, that is included as a subcompartment of a wikiproject. It works the same way, except in a more focused area. The WPBANNERMETA has hooks built in to support TFs. A TF, if it is large enough, supports its own Work Groups (WG), and WGs if they are large enough have separate Noticeboards (NB). ... But by that time, the TF or WG usually is split off into a separate wikiproject (WPP) of its own. 76.66.197.17 (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

I am afraid there are not enough active editors to warrant creating such a task force. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Quick Question

Is there anything that needs work on besides 1632?--Coldplay Expert 01:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC) there

The alternate history article itself needs a general cleanup to get rid of all those excess examples. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:08, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok and I can make maps too if anyone needs them.--Coldplay Expert 19:08, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Fox at the Front

Hello all, just came by to let you know I've completed an article and placed the proper WProject templates. hope someone can assess it too. Thanks.--Eaglestorm (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

US centric image in the WikiProject Alternate History template

Each time I look at {{WikiProject Alternate History}} I keep thinking that it is a template related to the (alternative) American Civil War. It is true that those stories form a very popular section of all alternate histories, but... can we perhaps come with a more global image? Mind you, I am blanking at what could it be, too. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:05, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps a mirror image of a globe? Naraht (talk) 20:10, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps. Do you have a specific image in mind? Perhaps we could make the current image a part of it, for example put it in the center or a (top right?) corner... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:12, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

I concur - This project, as is the genre of Alternate History itself, broader than the American Civil War. Also, while some might think "Confederate Lincoln" awesome, many more may find it offensive. Given the historic and still lingering connection between the Confederate flag and racism, perhaps someone could devise a more appropriate moniker for this project. After first earlier comments above I looked over in the commons for possible icons that might fit this project and found a reverse-rotating earth gif. Perhaps it would fit the bill? With this in mind, I was BOLD and replaced the images in Template:User WP AH 2 with the globe. I hope this helps move the conversation forward. Drdpw (talk) 14:36, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

My concern is that the globe isn't accruate. If you look, you can see that Africa goes almost all the way to the poles. It's like they took a map and cut off everything north and south of 60 degrees and wrapped that around a sphere..Naraht (talk) 20:27, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

I noticed that too, but presumed that the image used to create the globe showed the earth at the Summer Solstice. Perhaps someone could create another reverse-rotating globe for the project. I've also seen an upside-down rotating globe somewhere around here, that might work as well.Drdpw (talk) 22:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

A southern hemisphere summer solstice would point the pole toward the viewer...Naraht (talk) 00:54, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

I found the upside down globe image. Drdpw (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

This butterfly effect image might be an appropriate icon for the AH Project. Drdpw (talk) 18:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Alternate History articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Alternate History articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 00:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Red Inferno: 1945

Red Inferno: 1945 has been prodded for deletion. 65.93.15.125 (talk) 04:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Timeline-191

Timeline-191 has been nominated for deletion. 65.95.15.144 (talk) 06:26, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Non-fictional character

Non-fictional character has been prodded for deletion. 64.229.100.45 (talk) 04:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Konpeki no Kantai

I'm bringing this to the attention of WP:AH, using the google-translate versions, plus an episode guide. Hope you could help. Thank you. --Eaglestorm (talk) 14:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Project name?

Hello all, not completely sure how to use Wikipedia, but I wanted to point out that the foundation of this page is mistaken. You refer to 'alternate history', when you mean 'alternative history'. Something that is 'alternate' is something which 'occurs in turn repeatedly', or as an adjective, 'every other' time. Whereas, something that is alternative is something which is 'available as another possibility'. Therefore, this page should be named 'Alternative History'. Sorry for the mess I've created on this page! 85.210.39.216 (talk) 22:59, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

I think you mean "counterfactual history" -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 08:27, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Though technically not grammatical (its a misuse of the word alternate), its what the genre is most often called because of the connection between alternative history and secret history/conspiracy theories which as a serious form of historical discussion is not something AH writers like to be associated with.--Ollyoxenfree (talk) 23:09, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Nantucket serie: Nothing special or important

Battle of Nantucket
Part of the Walker War
Date May 10 A.E. Location Nantucket, United States of Nantucket Result Decisive Nantucket victory
Belligerents
Nantucket	Tartessos
Commanders and leaders
Marian Alston Sandy Rapczewicz	Zeurkenol Naudrikol
Strength
~2,000 Militia 1 Steam ram ship 3 Frigates Numerous smaller ships	5-6,000 Soldiers 8 Warships Troop transports
Casualties and losses
97 KIA Numerous wounded 2 Frigats damaged	1,000+ KIA Numerous captured 2 Warship lost 2 Warship captured

Nothing of importans, was just bored and did a little infobox about the Battle of Nantucket in the Against the Tide of Years and want to show it off, all reference are from chapter 22. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 23:56, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

BioShock listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for BioShock to be moved to BioShock (video game). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

BioShock listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for BioShock to be moved to BioShock (video game). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Confederate States Air Force

There is currently a discussion about the redirect Confederate States Air Force (which presently targets Commemorative Air Force), a term which seems most commonly used in alternate history, but is not mentioned at American Civil War alternate histories. Your comments are invited at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 27#Confederate States Air Force. Thryduulf (talk) 07:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Popular pages report

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternate History/Archive 1/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Alternate History.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

• The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
• The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
• The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Alternate History, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Battle Royale listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Battle Royale to be moved to Battle Royale (novel). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

.com

I created an entry for AlternateHistory.com - I saw it had been created in the past more than a decade ago and was deleted for relevancy, but it is mentioned in other articles and has existed for some time with considerable popularity so figured I should go ahead and add an entry for it. Spelf (talk) 18:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I'm sending it to deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Confederate (TV series) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Confederate (TV series) to be moved to Draft:Confederate (TV series). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 07:45, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Confederate (TV series) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Confederate (TV series) to be moved to Development of Confederate (TV series). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 09:04, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Project icon logo again

The project icon doesn't make a lot of sense - Lincoln on a Confederate flag, in addition to being pointlessly offensive, is US centric and doesn't really mean anything. There were a couple of interesting ideas up above - the butterfly logo and the upside down globe. Something like a map from The Man in the High Castle would be an option (albeit a bit of recentism since they're just a popular work right now). Or what I think might be simple would be to take the globe portion of the UN logo and color it red (see File:Red-300dpi.png for an image that has a red UN logo) and use that. It is readily recognized as not the normal logo, and it's inclusive of all of the world. --B (talk) 01:54, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Merge request input required

Formal request has been received to merge: How Few Remain, The Great War (novel series), The Great War: American Front, The Great War: Walk in Hell, The Great War: Breakthroughs, American Empire (Harry Turtledove), American Empire: Blood and Iron, American Empire: The Center Cannot Hold, American Empire: The Victorious Opposition, Settling Accounts, Settling Accounts: Return Engagement, Settling Accounts: Drive to the East, Settling Accounts: The Grapple and Settling Accounts: In at the Death into Southern Victory. Please join the re-opened discussion at >>>Turtledove series merge<<<, Thanks, GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 07:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikiproject image, part 2

I see it was discussed all the way back in 2012, and I recognize this is a sparsely-trafficked Wikiproject, but really, can we get a new image? The existing one is weird and problematic. I get that the (American) Civil War is a very fruitful ground for alternate history, but plenty of alternate history has nothing to do with it whatsoever. Get something generic like like flowchart arrows diverging made from messing around with commons:Category:Mathematical_arrows or the like. Or just have no image, that's fine too, an image isn't strictly necessary. SnowFire (talk) 09:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

SnowFire, 100% agree with this. Scrolling through this talk page, it seems like there is a relatively clear consensus over the years that the current image is unsuitable because it is too US-centric and also needlessly offensive/provocative. I've replaced it with File:U+21C4.svg from the Commons category that you recommended. Mz7 (talk) 05:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Southern Victory merger cancellation discussion

There is a discussion here that may be of interest to members of this group. FOARP (talk) 20:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)