Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:WPUKPOL)


Politics of the United Kingdom

PROJECT

Devoted to improving coverage of British politics on Wikipedia.



discussion page
Primary article Categories · Featured content · Templates
This is the talk page for WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom.
Place notices here about UK politics articles, and you will surely receive helpful support from interested editors!
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.
Be polite, and welcoming to new users
Assume good faith
Avoid personal attacks
For disputes, seek dispute resolution
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

Good article reassessment for Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty

[edit]

Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]

Hello, there appears to be edit warring on a number of politician articles over the use of Home Secretary or Secretary of State for the Home Department. Keith D (talk) 20:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

State Visit to Samoa

[edit]

Draft:State Visit by Charles III to Samoa needs some help. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 12:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National Wealth Fund Classification

[edit]

Hi there, I'm writing to request your help in a discussion I've started on the Talk:National_Wealth_Fund_(United_Kingdom) page. I'm not sure whether to classify the new National Wealth Fund as a sovereign wealth fund or something else. Any input would be appreciated.

Also, the new National Wealth Fund (United Kingdom) page could likely benefit from some further refinement. LunaExplorer (talk) 12:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - a merge proposal

[edit]

There's an open merge proposal at Talk:Winter fuel payment abolition backlash#Merge proposal that UK politics watchers might be interested in. -- DeFacto (talk). 09:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Crown Office#Requested move 28 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 15:45, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Aneurin Bevan

[edit]

Aneurin Bevan has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reactions to the 2019 Conservative Party leadership election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2019 Conservative Party leadership election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Unknown Temptation (talk) 21:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source applicability & spectrum position on Conservative Party (UK

[edit]

Cambial Yellowing and I are in dispute about the applicability of three – or four – sources being used to describe the position of the Conservative Party on the left-right spectrum. Outside opinion would be helpful in breaking the impasse. Cheers, Will Thorpe (talk) 13:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]