Wikipedia talk:Guide

Merge

They should all be merged. Do we need so many help efforts? --unforgettableid | talk to me 23:18, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Transclusion?

I see that you have constructed the various pages as links. Do we want to make them transcluded sub-pages instead, so the whole Guide will show up on a single page? DES ^(talk) 17:51, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If not then we need short instruictions on what is in each part, so the user knows to follow the links. DES ^(talk) 17:52, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Part 6

I am working on a draft for Part 6: The Wikipedia Community DES ^(talk) 17:51, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

The existing tangle of "how to use Wikipedia" articles gives the impression that, over a period of some time, a lot of people have come along and added their own little bit, but nobody has been managing the overall organisation. I think it's important that this guide does not become another addition in the same vein. I think that, if not already done, a thorough review of existing pages should take place. I think that this information should then be reorganised and reworked as necessary, and only then, as necessary, should new text be written. It's tempting to start writing a shiny new article rather than try to understand and improve what's there, but that may not be what is needed. Matt 12:06, 9 November 2005 (UTC).

Questions

Q :I want to ask that how would I know that I am whether autoconfirmed user or not? Ars147 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:02, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are autoconfirmed and have been for three weeks now: [1]. – Uanfala (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]