Wikipedia talk:Editorial oversight and control
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Title
[edit]Title: Editorial control process? Editorial oversight and control? FT2 (Talk | email) 02:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
About Larry Sanger's phrase
[edit]"Given enough eyeballs, all errors are shallow" - ????
A mob of several thousand monkeys have a lot of eyeballs, too.
--SciCorrector (talk) 13:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Questionable article name
[edit]My Websters gives the definition of oversight that is inappropriate to this page name before the appropriate one:
- oversight |ˈōvərˌsīt|
- noun
- 1 an unintentional failure to notice or do something :
- he said his failure to pay for the tickets was an oversight | was the mistake due to oversight?
- 2 the action of overseeing something :
- effective oversight of the financial reporting process.
And that was my first reaction when I saw it in the section of WP:About pointing here. As there is such a straightforward and unambiguous replacement, supervision with exactly the same roots, would it not be more auspicious to replace the darn word in the page name and all things leading here?
-- Trev M ~ 12:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Flagged revisions
[edit]There is a sentence which reads "The control known as flagged revisions is being rolled out as of 2007". Is it still being rolled out? Has the roll-out stalled or has the rollout been completed? Could someone in the know take a look at this? I am very unfamiliar with this whole area of quality management within WP so don't want to offer a change myself. Thanks. PeterEastern (talk) 10:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)