User talk:SciCorrector

Cook distance

Per your edit on Antarctica I did some searching of books and it appears the 75 miles is genuinely statute miles and not nautical miles. Polargeo (talk) 17:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! I wish I had access to such books. Anyhow, those distances (both in the books and in the article) are wrongly specified: that's what nautical miles are for, don't you agree? --SciCorrector (talk) 17:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indigeous people's

You were involved in a discussion on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Population_history_of_indigenous_peoples_of_the_Americas

There's a npov dispute, & I'd like to invite you to contribute your views to improve the artice.Ebanony (talk) 12:48, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Padmé clarification of Sabe's (Knightley's) role

Padmé posed as her own handmaiden when she accompanied the Jedi off the ship representing the Queen Padmé Amidala's interests. So yes one person but acting as two characters later revealed to be one. It's something of a plot hole in the Phantom Menace that the Jedi didn't notice she had the first name as the queen. Perhaps Padmé is a common name. The fact that queen decoy Sabe (Knightley) dubs the Queen's dialogue in varying releases make it more confusing. Moreover this whole ruse in the Phantom Menace was designed to confuse, and apparently worked in the real world as well. The section could use some clarification for all it would do. --Wlmg (talk) 02:59, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate tag

Hi, I noticed that you added two {{What?}} tags to the lede of Riemann integral. I have taken them out. It would be inappropriate for the lede of this article to spend a lot of time discussing this subject. The details of these claims are given later on in the article where they are more appropriate. Ozob (talk) 01:08, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]