Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Copy Edit of the Month/May 2013
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following event has concluded. Please do not modify this page. Comments should be made on the talk page.
The GOCE May Copy Edit of the Month is a two stage event. Submissions for the contest will run from 00:00 on 1 May 2013 (UTC) until 23:59 on 31 May 2013 (UTC). All submissions must be from copy edits that occur during the month of May. Voting on submissions will run from 00:00 on 1 June 2013 (UTC) until 23:59 on 30 June 2013 (UTC).
- The voting period is now closed.
- The submission period is now closed.
Support
[edit]Discussion
[edit]- Did you select this article out of personal interest, or was it random? —Torchiest talkedits 14:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Personal interest. I went to the article for Obrecht's dates, saw that it needed some work, and did some :) --Stfg (talk) 15:58, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support
[edit]Discussion
[edit]- Did you select this article out of personal interest, or was it random? —Torchiest talkedits 14:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dementia13 (talk)
[edit]Support
[edit]- Nice work! GabeMc (talk|contribs) 23:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Is the most expanded article by far. Good job! ~ Anastasia (talk) 02:59, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- There are some great edits on this page (and I wish I would have remembered to give you a run for your money with this) but your edits clearly are the most expansive and precise this month (with continued effort through June, as well). Job well done. czar · · 04:48, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
[edit]- Did you select this article out of personal interest, or was it random? —Torchiest talkedits 14:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- During the drives, I look for articles in which I have some kind of interest. This was one where I could have thrown it back as not ready for copy edit, but it was a subject of interest and was so poorly sourced and full of OR that I grabbed some references and did the cleanup myself. I'm actually still working on it, but the "diff" link I gave represents the point where it was complete from a copy editing standpoint. Dementia13 (talk) 00:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the comments. I typically don't expand during copy edits, I often cut 20-40% from a page. And I did take the chainsaw to this, but I also dug in with the research. That stretches the definition of "copy edit," but in terms of article improvement, it's a big difference. I put it in for GAN yesterday, and a reviewer has already jumped on it. I'm hoping to get it to FA. Dementia13 (talk) 15:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- During the drives, I look for articles in which I have some kind of interest. This was one where I could have thrown it back as not ready for copy edit, but it was a subject of interest and was so poorly sourced and full of OR that I grabbed some references and did the cleanup myself. I'm actually still working on it, but the "diff" link I gave represents the point where it was complete from a copy editing standpoint. Dementia13 (talk) 00:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support
[edit]Discussion
[edit]- Did you select this article out of personal interest, or was it random? —Torchiest talkedits 14:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It was a random selection; I was skimming the category for articles which need copyediting, to find a candidate, and this one looked promising. I do sort of feel an obligatory tie to it, since the subject of the article is from a country that runs largely in my father's bloodline. Trout me, and then just trout me, till I can get my troutifaction! (talk) 08:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The event above is closed. Please do not modify it. Comments should be made on the talk page.