Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 March 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< March 6 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 8 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 7

[edit]

00:14, 7 March 2024 review of submission by 49.157.61.171

[edit]

I was researching the credibility of this news outlet. I found a Wikipedia draft with tone issues. I tried to fix them, but I'm currently seeing that the draft is locked for editing. Why? 49.157.61.171 (talk) 00:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help-me request regarding Draft:Gaganyaan-4

[edit]

Three days into the AfC process and already I'm stuck. The process at Draft:Gaganyaan-4 became side-lined when someone else created a stub Gaganyaan-4 article. (Disclaimer: I've been hacking at the draft myself, not just commenting as a reviewer.) (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 01:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdsds: yeah, that happens occasionally; it can be frustrating, but not easily prevented, unfortunately. The draft author (or anyone else) should now selectively merge the salient additional info and sources into the published article. I've declined the draft on this basis. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

05:50, 7 March 2024 review of submission by 50.200.118.243

[edit]

Can you please edit the page title for this draft to James_Fox_(documentarian) because the page James_C._Fox already links to another page. I can't seem to update the page title. Thank you. 50.200.118.243 (talk) 05:50, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to worry about the title for the time being. If (and that remains quite a big 'if') this is accepted, the accepting reviewer will move it to an appropriate title when it is published.
Feel free to ask a question either here or at the Teahouse, but not both, as that duplicates the effort and wastes resources. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06:18, 7 March 2024 review of submission by 176.33.244.31

[edit]

The submission must be accepted without reason, stop rejecting and declining this. All the ones named "Woodle" or "Woodles" are already mentioned, and I'm able to find the fourth. What will happen after the submission being accepted? 176.33.244.31 (talk) 06:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This dab draft has been rejected and will not be considered further, let alone "accepted without reason" (whatever that means). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:22, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then, how to accept this disambiguation? If declining and rejecting are not allowed, what will be happened? 176.33.244.31 (talk) 10:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't "accept things without reason"; you need to make a case. Why do these topics need a disambiguation page? 331dot (talk) 10:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Except there are comments I sent, and the cases are already made here. 176.33.244.31 (talk) 10:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see where you have answered my question. Why do these need a disambiguation page? They don't seem likely to be confused with each other. 331dot (talk) 10:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
First, you can see the questions at the draft. Second, the disambiguation also includes what "Woodles" means. 176.33.244.31 (talk) 10:19, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't care what Disney wiki does.(on-draft comments are for reviewers only, discussion should take place on the draft talk page) Please review WP:DAB and cite the specific policies which you feel support the creation of a disambiguation pagem and the reasons why. 331dot (talk) 10:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did you see any disambiguations with citations or references of anything? 176.33.244.31 (talk) 10:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not my job to make your case for you. 331dot (talk) 10:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now, I'll try to make it enough to accept if I could not find one. 176.33.244.31 (talk) 10:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:09, 7 March 2024 review of submission by 2409:40F4:14:BC4C:98A8:94BD:BF85:9236

[edit]

Need to Create article for actor Jishnu Raghavan because he was an Indian actor I written this article with reliable sources 2409:40F4:14:BC4C:98A8:94BD:BF85:9236 (talk) 09:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you "need" to do this? You appear to be editing while logged out, please return to your account. 331dot (talk) 09:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot:, they do have several accounts which is why they are WP:LOUTSOCKing. --CNMall41 (talk) 09:32, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot I wouldn't recommend letting them create this article, especially on Ponyo's talk page, where they had the WP:IDHT attitude of saying they would never give up on creating the article. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. 331dot (talk) 10:41, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It (in its various permutations) must be on so many reviewers' watch lists by now that it'll be some feat to get it through. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:39, 7 March 2024 review of submission by Maestro110

[edit]

Dear Wikipedia, my question is that, if there is no any supporting reference is available except facebook and youtube, but the original place/thing exists physically, and it is well notable place in the related entity. So how can I publish my article where nothing is it at the newspaper or the magazines etc.? Maestro110 (talk) 09:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maestroi110 Your draft is in your sandbox, so I fixed the link to it. If you have no independent reliable sources to summarize in an article about this topic, it would not merit a Wikipedia article at this time. Wikipedia is not for merely documenting the existence of something. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11:27, 7 March 2024 review of submission by Hritacharya

[edit]

What are the details you believe i must add. From the web we have around 100 mentions. Hritacharya (talk) 11:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hritacharya: I have rejected this draft, and it will therefore not be considered further at this time.
You still need to disclose your COI / paid-editing, though, lest you get blocked. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12:35, 7 March 2024 review of submission by Arhan Jain

[edit]

Look, some dumb fellow- 'KylieTastic' is disapproving my Wikipage! He gives multiple reasons!

1.) 'Not in-depth'. OK true but bro there are like 100 pages where there are incomplete informations...what happened while approving that?? That to I personally told him that I would write more after confirming the facts with the elders...oh the wikipage that I am reffering from is about our temple by the way.

2.) 'No Reliable source'. What the hell bro...I did say him that it was my temple...of course I (or my family) know the maximum...!

3.) 'Secondary'! Wow bro...secondary source he asks for! Bro, say one thing...how should I write some reference of the new topic if the topic is new(i.e. new topic means I am the first one to talk about and so there is no 'another editor' to refer from)!

4.) 'Independent'!? Bro...I have no words....

Bro look, I gave my proper reasons for you guys...now it is up to you guys. I want him to be notified if you find me way and reason for this defense right! link for the wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Koti_Basadi,_Moodbidre Arhan Jain (talk) 12:35, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the first to write about a topic, then it does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability, and no article about it can be accepted into Wikipedia. Period.
Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. ColinFine (talk) 23:35, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12:39, 7 March 2024 review of submission by Arhan Jain

[edit]

Look, some dumb fellow- 'KylieTastic' is disapproving my Wikipage! He gives multiple reasons!

1.) 'Not in-depth'. OK true but bro there are like 100 pages where there are incomplete informations...what happened while approving that?? That to I personally told him that I would write more after confirming the facts with the elders...oh the wikipage that I am reffering from is about our temple by the way.

2.) 'No Reliable source'. What the hell bro...I did say him that it was my temple...of course I (or my family) know the maximum...!

3.) 'Secondary'! Wow bro...secondary source he asks for! Bro, say one thing...how should I write some reference of the new topic if the topic is new(i.e. new topic means I am the first one to talk about and so there is no 'another editor' to refer from)!

4.) 'Independent'!? Bro...I have no words....

Bro look, I gave my proper reasons for you guys...now it is up to you guys. I want him to be notified if you find me way and reason for this defense right! link for the wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Koti_Basadi,_Moodbidre Arhan Jain (talk) 12:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arhan Jain: please do not insult reviewers, or anyone else for that matter; and I for one don't think 'bro' is an appropriate way to address others.
As for your draft  Courtesy link: Draft:Koti Basadi, Moodbidre, it is completely unreferenced. This means it fails the core requirements of verifiability and notability, and was therefore correctly declined.
That being the case, do you have a question you would like to ask? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see other stuff exists. Wikipedia likely has many inappropriate articles that volunteers simply haven't addressed yet. This is not a reason to add more inappropriate articles. If you want to help us, please identify any inappropriate articles you see for possible action. We're only as good as the people who choose to help. 331dot (talk) 13:51, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to use other articles as a model or example, use those that are classified as good articles. 331dot (talk) 13:53, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:40, 7 March 2024 review of submission by Nahnathanhatthat

[edit]

To make this worthy to be on the wikipedia page Nahnathanhatthat (talk) 14:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nahnathanhatthat: that's not a question, any more than this is a viable article draft. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:42, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:04, 7 March 2024 review of submission by Sativasir

[edit]

Why did my article get rejected? What can I do different to get it published? Sativasir (talk) 17:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted as advertising and misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost. That's all I can say because your draft was suppressed from even administrators. 331dot (talk) 22:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

22:21, 7 March 2024 review of submission by 1Tytonidae1

[edit]

Since having my article rejected, I've implemented revisions, added substantially more content, and added reliable published secondary sources to demonstrate notability. What are next steps? 1Tytonidae1 (talk) 22:21, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Typically a rejected article may not be resubmitted, but if you have fundamentally changed the draft in a way that you think addresses the concern of the reviewers, the first step is to appeal to the reviewer that rejected it. 331dot (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

22:53, 7 March 2024 review of submission by Hkc345

[edit]

The name of the Person on the Wikipedia page has an accent on top of the letter "a" (Suárez) but the cited sources do not have the accent (Suarez) because some languages, newspapers, etc. do not use accents, would it be an issue overall? Thank You. Hkc345 (talk) 22:53, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming https://www.jorgesuarezpianist.com is owned by Suarez himself, so per WP:ABOUTSELF (and the newspapers you mentioned) the accent should not be there. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 23:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2024_March_7&oldid=1213528859"