Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 July 19
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < July 18 | << Jun | July | Aug >> | July 20 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
July 19
[edit]editing a declined draft
[edit]- I have competed an edit for my draft Dan Snyder (artist), but when I hit the publish button I get this message:
- Something went wrong
- ⧼No stashed content found for 1140753667/e08e44c8-1f5a-11ee-8c71-b04f13be4f10⧽
- How can I proceed?
Jjcoste2 (talk) 01:35, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello! Were you able to figure out a way around the error message? I am having the same issue :( Joshbonat2580 (talk) 05:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Joshbonat2580,
- I am sorry to hear that. A lot of work has happened since then so I may not be 100% on this, but I was trying to publish an edit when I encountered the error message. A experienced editor made an edit on my draft that I think removed the error while removing my access to the visual editor but allowed me to work in source to finish the job. You might want to contact Theroadislong about your problem if it persists. Jjcoste2 (talk) 18:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
05:35, 19 July 2023 review of submission by Fazal Rahiman CM
[edit]Submission rejected on 19 July 2023 by DoubleGrazing (talk). Fazal Rahiman CM (talk) 05:35, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Fazal Rahiman CM: that's not a question – do you have one in mind? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
05:41, 19 July 2023 review of submission by Kumudpantt
[edit]- Kumudpantt (talk · contribs)
My article was not verified. please help me Kumudpantt (talk) 05:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Kumudpantt: you need to be more specific, what sort of help do you want? Your draft was declined for lack of apparent notability. Also, if you haven't yet read WP:AUTOBIO for all the reasons why you shouldn't be writing about yourself, please do so now. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
11:56, 19 July 2023 review of submission by Anavean
[edit]Hi, thank you for your comments...you mentioned that the article is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia, but Armeconombank is one of the largest banks in Armenia, and since the article has its Armenian version, we want to have it in English as well. Please help us. What should I do even when all the reliable sources are noted? Anavean (talk) 11:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Anavean: if the company doesn't meet our notability standard, the draft cannot be accepted. Neither being "one of the largest banks in Armenia", nor having an article in the Armenian language version of Wikipedia, matters in the slightest.
- BTW, who is "we" and "us"? Wikipedia user accounts are strictly for one person's use only.
- And what is your relationship with this bank? I will post a message on your user talk page with instructions for managing a conflict of interest. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
11:57, 19 July 2023 review of submission by PawanSaunya
[edit]- PawanSaunya (talk · contribs)
The draft has been declined twice. The first time it was noted that the majority of references were from the company's own site, which we then changed to make sure that they came from a range of independent sources.
However the second time it was declined it has still said there is an issue with the references, although I cannot tell what this is. The editor said that it reads more like an advertisement, and we wanted to know which bits in particular sound promotional and can be changed.
Many thanks. PawanSaunya (talk) 11:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- PawanSaunya By "we" I assume you are saying that you represent the company. If so, the Terms of Use require you to make a formal paid editing disclosure. You should also read conflict of interest.
- Wikipedia is not a place to document the existence of a company and tell what it does. An article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Interviews, press releases, brief mentions, announcements of the routine business activities of the company, and other primary sources do not establish notability. Most of the sources you offer seem to be interviews or product announcements. I gather the claim to notability is that the company has a unique business strategy(manufacturing speakers out of recycled materials); if so, the article should only summarize independent reliable sources that describe this. 331dot (talk) 12:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
13:34, 19 July 2023 review of submission by V.B.Speranza
[edit]- V.B.Speranza (talk · contribs)
Requesting help, is it good enough? What’s wrong? If it isn’t important enough, why?
-thank you, V.B. V.B.Speranza (talk) 13:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- The draft was rejected, meaning that it won't be considered further. As noted on the draft, "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia." If something has fundamentally changed since the rejection, the first step is to attempt to appeal to the last reviewer directly. 331dot (talk) 13:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
15:04, 19 July 2023 review of submission by Obelista
[edit]Hi, How best to add authority verifications for scientists such as ORCID and other recognized authorities that are external to Wikipedia? Thanks, Obelista (talk) 15:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
editing a draft Dan Snyder (artist)
[edit]- July 19th I submitted:
- I have competed an edit for my draft Dan Snyder (artist), but when I hit the publish button I get this message:
- Something went wrong
- ⧼No stashed content found for 1140753667/e08e44c8-1f5a-11ee-8c71-b04f13be4f10⧽
- How can I proceed?
- A member interfaced with me and now I have lost my edit and my ability to see and use the visual editor.
Can I retrieve the Visual Editor ? Jjcoste2 (talk) 17:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)