Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 December 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< December 1 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 3 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 2

[edit]

02:11, 2 December 2023 review of submission by Gorkem80

[edit]

The draft is not accepted, however, the criteria for High Schools mostly state that it is sufficient for the high school to exist and to be a real high school. There are a high number of mentions in the Turkish national media (Milliyet, Hurriyet: which are equivalents of The New York Times and Washington Post in Turkey.) Even if these are just passing mentions about the successes of the school's students, it should be sufficient for a high school. Am I interpreting the criteria incorrectly? Update: I realized the "reliable proof of existence is sufficient" criteria for High Schools has been abandoned since 2017. But still, there are tons of High School articles on Wikipedia with a much weaker demonstration of notability. There is a guideline discouraging editors from nominating them for deletion, keeping in mind that it is likely that there are other sources not readily available online. Should the same criteria not be applied here, for this particular high school? The achievement examples are just a small subset of national news coverage that I could find available online. Gorkem80 (talk) 02:11, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gorkem80 see WP:OTHERSTUFF about the existence of the other articles. You are correct there are other poor articles that were created before the change in notability criteria so may not meet the criteria as it stands today and likely should be deleted. The criteria as it stands for public schools is WP:GNG. If there are sources that meet the criteria, then cite them. Stating "they must exist" is not enough. I see you have resubmitted the draft so another reviewer will take a look. S0091 (talk) 21:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

03:33, 2 December 2023 review of submission by Lisaasills

[edit]

How do I cite myself (Lisa Sills) as the inventor of the word "finagle"? Lisaasills (talk) 03:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

03:40, 2 December 2023

[edit]


Can you please redirect the 2027 NFL season article for me please i would accept it 03:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

04:13, 2 December 2023 review of submission by 114.178.137.10

[edit]

This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia >> Please tell us the reason of 'not sufficiently notable', because Dr Sakakibara's work contributed significantly to neurological patients with bladder and bowel dysfunction (previously underestimated field, Neurourology and Neurogastroenterology), while descriptive tone was neutral. (reference: 'Prokar Dasgupta', medical doctor, wikipedia page.) 114.178.137.10 (talk) 04:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IP, taking a brief look it several of the sources are his own publications which are primary and not independent so not use (not to mention many if not all are already in the Publications section). I suggest removing all of those. Other sources make no mention of him so not useful and again should not be used so remove all of those. Given the draft is rejected, your recourse is to reach out the editor who rejected the draft. S0091 (talk) 20:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

04:28, 2 December 2023 review of submission by Jacob Laco

[edit]

How can I make a better article? Jacob Laco (talk) 04:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article will not be accepted into Wikipedia because it has been rejected. If you wish for more general advice as to how to write, see WP:Your first article and WP:Writing better articles Mach61 (talk) 05:38, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

04:43, 2 December 2023 review of submission by 2409:4062:2D9F:75CB:3338:930:EBCD:CBC2

[edit]

Srushti Deshmukh is a popular IAS who became IAS by fixing the All Over India fifth Rank in UPSC Exam 2018 in her 1st attempt. She is also very famous on social media handles such as YouTube, and Instagram, and has more than one million followers on her Instagram handle, her duty and wedding videos are usually viral on social media handles.

Srishti Deshmukh, who became an IAS in her 1st UPSC attempt, was born on 28 March 1995 in Kasturba Nagar, Bhopal, MP, and is mostly popular for securing fifth rank in the UPSC exam 2018. Aside from this, videos of her duty usually go viral on YouTube and Instagram reels, due to which She has got more popularity. IAS Srishti Deshmukh finished her primary education at Carmel Convent School, BHEL, Bhopal, and Later, She begin engineering studies at Laxmi Narayan Engineering College after Middle, and from the last semester of engineering, he begin preparations for UPSC.2409:4062:2D9F:75CB:3338:930:EBCD:CBC2 (talk) 04:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Please do not create more such content, as this is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

08:32, 2 December 2023 review of submission by 2409:4062:2D9F:75CB:7166:E13F:3C10:5DBB

[edit]

Satyanarayan Maharana's real name is Laxmi Narayan Maharana. By mistake, news have written his brother, that is why I request you to publish this page and people will know that his real name is Laxmi Narayan Maharana. 2409:4062:2D9F:75CB:7166:E13F:3C10:5DBB (talk) 08:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected as non-notable, and will therefore not be considered further.
Wikipedia is not here to correct information erroneously published by third parties; if you wish for such misinformation to be corrected, your best bet would no doubt be to approach those media outlets which have made the error. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

09:17, 2 December 2023 review of submission by Amir Hossein Palizdar

[edit]

hi, could you provide me with why you diclined my article? 

Amir Hossein Palizdar (talk) 09:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Amir Hossein Palizdar: I had to reject it in the end, since you kept resubmitting it, although it had been pointed out twice already that we can only accept English-language content here on the English-language Wikipedia, and this draft self-evidently is not in English. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

10:52, 2 December 2023 review of submission by Rahatul Islam official

[edit]

Mohammad Rahatul Islam Rahatul Islam official (talk) 10:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahatul Islam official: you don't ask a question, but this draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a platform to tell the world about yourself. Try some sort of social media or blogging site instead. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. Please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 10:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13:28, 2 December 2023 review of submission by HfxCJP

[edit]

I am starting to get a bit confused. I was told to look at other notable wiki pages for people that are on here.. and I am posting the same amount of info... is it the format I am putting the info in? here is the example I went from : Devyn Nekoda

Please help if you have the time...

HfxCJP (talk) 13:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HfxCJP it appears he has had minor roles, not starring or lead support roles. In order to meet the notability guidelines, you need to show he has had significant roles in notable works or there has been significant coverage about him. Neither is met. Also, most of the awards are minor so I suggest trimming that down to the major awards he personally has won. This is likely a case of WP:TOOSOON where he does not meet the notability guidelines now but may very well at some point in the future. S0091 (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
gotcha.. thank you very much! Have a great day. HfxCJP (talk) 21:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
HfxCJP, your draft claims that one of his most notable roles is on the TV showl Mr. D, and yet the Wikipefia article about that show does not mention him. That is incongruous and likely to generate scrutiny from reviewers. Cullen328 (talk) 09:18, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14:57, 2 December 2023 review of submission by Rana wikibio

[edit]

Now what can i do Plesse said me Rana wikibio (talk) 14:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rana wikibio: nothing doing, this draft has been rejected. Also, do not remove the AfC templates, please. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will not remove your opinion in the discussion but I request you to review again. You see all the sources given there are news sources. Wikipedia needs a more reliable source though. But the sources that are given there are not unsafe at all. Hope you will help this little brother to keep my draft alive by re-reviewing Rana wikibio (talk) 15:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Which part of "do not remove the AfC templates" do you struggle with? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:41, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21:29, 2 December 2023 review of submission by 98.186.55.18

[edit]

Can you Please put a redirect on the 2027 NFL season article please i would accept it 98.186.55.18 (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IP, see WP:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories for requesting a new redirect. S0091 (talk) 22:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
According to my calendar, it is still 2023. Why would any editor spend time working on an annual event that will probably take place in 2027, but the world could also be destroyed in the interim? Cullen328 (talk) 09:09, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

22:22, 2 December 2023 review of submission by IcosaMarty343

[edit]

i cannot find any reliable sources for the content IcosaMarty343 (talk) 22:22, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@IcosaMarty343: It's probably not notable then, unfortunately. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 22:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
IcosaMarty343 Articles need reliable sources in order to exist. You may want to touch base over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics for ideas of sources that might include it. (I have a degree in Mathematics, and all of the Math looks like, you just need to how that this isn't your creation, that it is what *others* have called it)Naraht (talk) 22:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2023_December_2&oldid=1189150062"