Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 October 22
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < October 21 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | October 23 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
October 22
[edit]02:30:27, 22 October 2022 review of submission by Mr3D247
[edit]
Mr3D247 (talk) 02:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Courtesy link: Draft:Harold Calderon (presumably?)- What is your question, @Mr3D247? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. I reviewed the reasons for my article being rejected and have updated my references. I've added 9 total. I was looking for clarification to ensure that the references were my only issue and that i cited them right. Mr3D247 (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
03:40:11, 22 October 2022 review of submission by Legaltimes
[edit]- Legaltimes (talk · contribs)
Legaltimes (talk) 03:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Legaltimes: you don't ask a question, but this draft has been rejected and won't be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:06, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
05:10:19, 22 October 2022 review of submission by EditMarathiwiki
[edit]
Hii Team , i wrote an article of Indian Actor
Vishwanath kulkarni who had done many Marathi serials , theatre plays ,one Marathi movie and recently worked in two hindi webseries and Also add reference from Authentic sources such as Indian Newspaper Times of India , Maharashtra Times , Loksatta also Bollywood News website cinestaan but still wikipedia volunteer had rejected my article on basis of previous dialogues boxed in which other volunteer gaves there remarks but I want to tell you previous wikipedia contributor haven't add references to this article and when I created this article I add genuine and authentic reference from Trusted sources and though he has experience in Acting but don't have enough sources it doesn't mean the person is not known...I request you please do check again and help me to improve my article and accept as an article by wikipedia team.
EditMarathiwiki (talk) 05:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- @EditMarathiwiki this draft has been rejected and won't be considered further. An article on the same subject was deleted earlier this month following an AfD discussion.
- And please don't post multiple messages here about the same topic, just once is enough. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
11:58:03, 22 October 2022 review of submission by Anthropology Daily
- Anthropology Daily (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
I am requesting assistance in the verification of my article. I believe that the Wikipedia editor who looked over my draft article was not fully correct in his grading and insights. Firstly, this is not an autobiography; this is an article I am writing about someone who I deem is worthy of recognition as she has played a huge role in climate activism all over Nigeria. Secondly, I agree that there is not an extensive use of references for my subject, but sadly, that is the case for most Nigerian Citizens. There is usually not a lot of their work posted online. This does not deem them unworthy of praise. Forcing these subjects to fit to the western standards of research is unfair and unruly.
I hope that someone else can review my draft and if there are any other concerns other than the references, I would love to hear them so I can get the article published.
Anthropology Daily (talk) 11:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Anthropology Daily: we don't create articles based on someone being "worth of recognition" or "worthy of praise", etc.; we create them based on what independent, reliable sources have said about a person. If you cannot find such sources, then you cannot have an article, no matter how "worthy" the person may in your opinion be. And this has nothing to do with "western standards", but with the policies and guidelines of the English-language Wikipedia.
- You will get another review of your draft, once you resubmit it. You should, however, first address the reasons why it was declined, because otherwise it will only be declined again. This means providing reliable sources to support the draft contents, as well as sources that satisfy the WP:GNG or other variant of notability. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- I would add that sources do not need to be online, printed works in a library are fine, as long as the public can access them. 331dot (talk) 14:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Draft: Mike_Afolarin
[edit]
Courtesy link: Draft: Mike_Afolarin
I need help with the referencing, I submitted it for approval but declined it because of the reference. Yemsquare (talk) 12:06, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Yemsquare: that's because it is mostly referenced with Wikipedia, which cannot be used as a source on Wikipedia, and YouTube, which is user-generated and as such not considered reliable. You need to find sources that meet the reliability criteria, and can establish notability per WP:GNG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the advice Yemsquare (talk) 14:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Yemsquare The phrase "He warmed his way into the hearts of Nigerians" is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. David10244 (talk) 08:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, I will correct that Yemsquare (talk) 14:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
17:42:47, 22 October 2022 review of submission by 213.22.215.69
[edit]
SkyShowtime is one of the biggest streaming services in Europe. In 22 european countries, there will not be availabe the Paramount+, Showtime neither Peacock services, but SkyShowtime, a joint venture between Comcast and Paramount Global with TV shows and films from Universal Pictures, Paramount Pictures, Nickelodeon, DreamWorks Animation, Paramount+, SHOWTIME®, Sky Studios and Peacock, and also original content. In many countries it's as important as Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video and HBO Max. So, it's really important.
213.22.215.69 (talk) 17:42, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
20:57:43, 22 October 2022 review of submission by RugbyL123
[edit]Ive added citations to the first draft, any help welcome. Its my first page and the content is all completely accurate RugbyL123 (talk) 20:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)