Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 November 30
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 29 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | December 1 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 30
[edit]07:36:24, 30 November 2022 review of draft by SanoSirius
[edit]- SanoSirius (talk · contribs)
How to add Video links of News about the person
SanoSirius (talk) 07:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- @SanoSirius: don't worry about adding video links for now; instead, think how you're going to justify the inclusion of this article, given that Annamalai Kuppusamy has been deleted and salted, Draft:Annamalai Kuppusamy has been rejected, and there are two prior AfD discussions (this and this) which resulted in delete verdicts. I'd say you're flogging the proverbial dead horse. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for bring this information to my knowledge, I see there was a confusion of two different persons named Annamalai K. Also I see one of the other article has been with dropped due to notability. in this case kindly advice how should I proceed further. with the article I created. SanoSirius (talk) 09:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
08:51:33, 30 November 2022 review of submission by Thepublich
[edit]- Thepublich (talk · contribs)
Feel free to edit/ rewrite article. Did research I see multiple article with vent magazine as a source.(Noah Cyrus) and see numerous article with less references but are published. feedback and assisted with greatly appreciated
best Thepublich (talk) 08:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Thepublich: this draft has been rejected and won't therefore be considered further. For the same reason, no point in editing it, either, although if someone one day wants to rewrite a draft on the same topic, they're free to do so, of course; perhaps by then the subject has actually become notable. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:56, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
10:31:20, 30 November 2022 review of submission by Abhinav1976
[edit]- Abhinav1976 (talk · contribs)
Help me to create this article. how can i fix this problem? Abhinav1976 (talk) 10:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Abhinav1976: you cannot 'fix' it; the draft has been rejected for lack of notability, and this is therefore the end of the road for it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Abhinav1976 (ec) You can't. The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. No amount of editing can confer notability on a topic. You will have to use this as a learning experience and move on to another topic. 331dot (talk) 10:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Abhinav1976 you have asked why there are articles about Alaukik Rahi and Prachi Vaishnav, but not about Devaksh Rai. The answer is that there are many, many articles in Wikipedia that don't meet Wikipedia's notability criteria, but the fact that there are articles that don't meet the minimum standards does not mean that it's OK to create even more such articles. Alaukik Rahi has been nominated for deletion. --bonadea contributions talk 13:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
18:04:18, 30 November 2022 review of draft by Violetssss
[edit]- Violetssss (talk · contribs)
Hello, I'm reaching out to determine the cause of denial for the article I'm creating. I'm assuming it's something to do with my sources but I'm not sure where to begin correcting the issues. This is my first time creating a wiki article after browsing for many years so I'm not entirely up to speed on the do's and don'ts. Any and all help is greatly appreciated, thank you very much :)
Violetssss (talk) 18:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Violetssss: as it says in the decline notice, for notability by WP:GNG we need to see significant coverage (of the person, not any indirectly related matters) in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the subject.
- You also need to ensure that anything potentially contentious or of private personal nature (and this includes things like DOB) is clearly supported by inline citations to reliable published sources. (This wasn't the reason why your draft was declined, but it is one that drafts on living people often fail on.) HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
19:25:42, 30 November 2022 review of draft by 130.113.231.82
[edit]
I am requesting help because my draft has been declined multiple times due to a lack of reliable sources. It's difficult for me to see where I need to include more sources and how to know when I have a sufficient amount of reliable sources. I have read all the info on Wikipedia regarding reliable sources and I'm hoping to get more specific tips on my draft of how to improve it.
130.113.231.82 (talk) 19:25, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- As has been explained in the decline notices, you need sources that are not only reliable but also in-depth about the topic and independent of the subject of the article. Which of your sources meet all of these conditions? Most of the sources seem to came from the laboratory and lab personnel themselves. Most labs at universities are not well-enough covered in such sources to have separate articles about them in Wikipedia. StarryGrandma (talk) 21:27, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
22:25:19, 30 November 2022 review of draft by Musicologiver
[edit]
This article required additional reviews, evidence of the ensemble's importance worthy of a Wikipedia article. It was suggested that publication/release of a CD would be useful in this. I have added such information and would welcome any additional help, though I would hope that there is now enough citations etc to permit the article's publication.
Musicologiver (talk) 22:25, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Musicologiver You may submit the draft for another review- we don't really do pre-review reviews. 331dot (talk) 22:27, 30 November 2022 (UTC)