Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 November 21
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 20 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 22 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 21
[edit]04:53:05, 21 November 2022 review of submission by Asaad991
[edit]
my page gets declined i need help why it's happened and who can i have one i am writing about the company i am working with need support
Asaad991 (talk) 04:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Asaad991 We do not and will not accept advertorials. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 04:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
13:54:34, 21 November 2022 review of submission by Dakika2022
[edit]- Dakika2022 (talk · contribs)
Dakika2022 (talk) 13:54, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
How can I publish this article, I already added links and citation sources?
- Dakika2022 You can't, rejection means resubmission is not possible. If you have new information that the reviewer did not consider, please first appeal to them directly. But from looking at it, I don't think that's the case. 331dot (talk) 13:59, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
QUOTE: This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
=> HI THERE... I AM MANAGER OF ARTIST. I TRIED TO WRITE INFO FOLLOWING CONTENT FROM PUBLISHED ARTICLES CAN BE FOUND ON GOOGLE AND ADD ON A BIT FACTS. PLEASE SHOW ME IF YOU CAN HELP TO RE-EDIT BASED ON YOUR WIKIPEDIA EXPERIENCE, THANK YOU.
QUOTE: This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Many of the sources used are not reliable such as L'Officiel articles with no by-line, Spotify, Youtube, musiXmatch, blogs, forums, etc. Also, interviews with her or those affiliated with her are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability.
=> I REALLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND, L'OFFICIEL IS POPULAR RELIABLE SOURCE AND THEY HAVE POLICY TO PUBLISH ARTICLE TO MENTION "BY LINE" AS SEEN WRITTEN "BY L'OFFICIEL BALTIC" OR "BY L'OFFICIEL SINGAPORE" OR "BY L'OFFICIEL MALAYSIA" DISPLAY ON TOP OF ARTICLE. FOR INTERVIEW ESPECIALLY ON FAB UK MAGAZINE, IT WAS HER OWN THOUGHT ANSWER, AND HER THOUGHT MAY CHANGE BY TIME GROWING UP. EVEN ADULT MODEL/ARTIST'S INTERVIEW ARE ALSO NOT INDEPENDENT, USED TO BE SEEN ADULT ARTISTS ALSO MAYBE ADVISED BY AGENT/MANAGER BEFORE PUBLISHING. KATHY'S ARTIST PROFILE IS VERIFIED BLUE BADGE ON SPOTIFY, APPLE MUSIC, AND KATHY'S SOCIAL PAGE FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM ALSO BEEN VERIFIED BLUE BADGE. IT SHOULD BE RELIABLE. HOPE WIKIPEDIA REVIEW, THANKS.
ForeverMemory (talk) 14:35, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- @ForeverMemory: firstly, please do not shout (ALL CAPS).
- Secondly, this draft has been deleted as promotional. That being the case, what is your question? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:56, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- OP now blocked. 331dot (talk) 15:31, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
22:51:36, 21 November 2022 review of submission by JOSEPH CARRARO
[edit]- JOSEPH CARRARO (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
JOSEPH CARRARO (talk) 22:51, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- User now blocked for WP:NOTHERE, draft has been deleted. echidnaLives - talk - edits 23:20, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Finally, why is it that none of the folks who decide what gets published on my page is identified by name. Are they fearful of legal action that would question not only their judgement, but their motives as well? We'll see. I really don't have anymore time to waste since I will be attempting to do things to help my fellow man that you will never read about, as you all will spend your time and life as the guardians of Wikipedia causing your fellow man to waste their time. I have realized years ago when my account was continually vandalized that I don't need Wikipedia with all it's falsehoods without "real'. VERIFICATION and it doesn't need me. Bother someone else.
- You're a politician. Does the word "slapp" mean anything to you? It does to us, which is why SOP for veiled legal threats like this is to indefinitely block the account until they unequivocally retract their threat or their case concludes. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 23:41, 21 November 2022 (UTC)