Help desk
< June 16	<< May \| June \| Jul >>	June 18 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

June 17

03:48:06, 17 June 2022 review of draft by HelpingWorld

HelpingWorld (talk · contribs)
- Draft:National Military Appreciation Month (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

What Wikiproject tags would fit Draft:National Military Appreciation Month I am confused on this subject. All help is appreciated!`~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 03:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

`~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 03:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HelpingWorld: I wouldn't worry about that yet, the projects and ratings can be added at or after publication. In any case, that's not an AfC matter, so you should probably ask at the TEAHOUSE, rather. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ DoubleGrazing do you think my draft has a large chance to be accepted?`~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 08:45, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is what the review will consider, whenever it takes place (and it won't, until you click on that blue button!), so let's not jump the gun. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright thanks for the help.`~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 09:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07:25:57, 17 June 2022 review of submission by ZRJOY10

ZRJOY10 (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!

I copy the content from my own site.I want to add that site in wikipedia.Why the copyright issue their. That is my site and I am the employee of that site. ZRJOY10 (talk) 07:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ZRJOY10 It's not enough to just tell us that you own it, the content must be properly donated, see WP:DCP. The licence of the content on your website must also be compatible with Wikipedia's. (allowing for reuse for any purpose, including commercial) In any event, we don't want a direct copy of other websites, as a Wikipedia article primarily summarizes what independent reliable sources state about a topic, not what it says about itself. 331dot (talk) 07:57, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:44:58, 17 June 2022 review of draft by 122.173.27.211

122.173.27.211 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:United Nations Forum on Sustainability Standards (UNFSS) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am bot sure what is this duplicate publication 122.173.27.211 (talk) 08:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I've deciphered your comment correctly, you're saying this draft does not duplicate another submission. This is correct, given that the other draft was deleted yesterday. It was also correct at the time of declining (back in April) to say that it did. Given all that, what is your question? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10:16:03, 17 June 2022 review of submission by 14.201.79.63

14.201.79.63 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Steven He (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am requesting a re-review as I have expanded this article

14.201.79.63 (talk) 10:16, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This draft was rejected, and will not be considered again.

Please do not remove the earlier AfC tags, they need to stay there (it does say not to remove them). I have restored the rejection tag.

Also, incorrect edit comments don't help anyone. You had removed the tag with the comment "added a bit of text", which is misleading. Please do leave comments, but please ensure they accurately reflect what you've done. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15:51:39, 17 June 2022 review of submission by CatIvan

CatIvan (talk · contribs)
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Article: Draft:Clément_Bérini

I'd like your advice for the submission of the Draft:Clément_Bérini article: is the writing tone correct? Do any paragraphs need to more information and sources? Or less?

I also wonder how to show the notability criteria. In the article there are supporting sources for most of the notability items and subitems, and I can bring in more reliable sources for most of the items, regarding for example: #1 widely cited by peers, #3 principal role in creating well-known work, #4b main/sole exhibitor for significant exhibitions, #4c significant critical attention, and #4d represented within the permanent collections of notable gallery and museum.

Regarding the other criteria, while Bérini is recognised by his peers for his artistic development, he is commended by academics as notable for introducing Modern sensibilities in his cultural and artistic communities, which are traditionally lacking artistic production and collection. I also have more academic sources, besides those in the article, about the impact and importance of Bérini in the social and arts communities, but the detailed discussion of his social and historic importance seems out of place in this article, and more relevant to other articles about the cultural history of Franco-canadian communities and arts.

Thank you for your help, cat (talk) 15:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CatIvan: in essence, you're asking us to review the draft, which isn't really what this help desk is here to do. If you feel that you've addressed the reason(s) for the earlier decline, please click on the 'resubmit' button and in due course a reviewer will come along.

But FWIW, my opinion, based on a cursory glance, is that the style is overly verbose, and the tone somewhat 'chatty'; it comes across as a personal essay, rather than an encyclopaedia entry. If it were my draft, I'd go for a more concise, factual and formal approach still.

I also couldn't help noticing that some of the content isn't properly referenced. There are many paragraphs where the only citation is quite early on, with the remainder of the text unsupported. You need to ensure that every material statement is clearly backed up by a reliable source.

Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:27:31, 17 June 2022 review of draft by 223.182.97.2

223.182.97.2 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Dayana Erappa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I dont understand what is required. I am so sorry. 223.182.97.2 (talk) 19:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have you actually read the reasons for declining (those grey boxes inside the large pink ones)? They clearly explain in quite a lot of detail what needs to be improved. I don't wish to merely repeat here what has been said already, but if you have a specific question you can put that to us. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]